Who is at Guantanamo?

The article itself says that the information available to make the report is limited. In other words there is information missing.

 

npc said:

Well, tell you what, back in the late sixties and early seventies I was part of an underground armed struggle movement that had cells that ambushed government soldiers, and cells that were above ground conducting "peasants'-workers'" education which involved heightening their political awareness without necessarily mentioning the taking up of arms.

I was, for a time, part of the latter type of cell.

The government caught me, and incarcerated me, though I had not committed "hostile" acts against the government up to that point.

Were they right, or were they wrong.

Seems to me we have to define what "hostile" means.

Does "hostile" mean actually having taken up arms and striking at US targets ? Or does "hostile" also include unarmed propaganda.

I am sorry, but up to this point in time, I find it hard to accept your insinuations that the United States of America, as represented by its government, has become a de facto martial state, trampling on the principles of justice, equality, and human rights such as a country like North Korea, and is no longer the same United States you were born in, and which we immigrants admired from a distance.

Sometimes I do not recognize it, but a lot of times the old face still shows.

 

..............

 

Would you like to see Americans held for an indeterminate time without being charged and unable to contact anyone in a foreign country? I suppose the hostages in Iran were a good example of this.

 

I think they are being held because they know too much. In other words they are political prisioners.

 

What does people whose hobby is to destroy this nation have to do with both parties political corruptness? They are two seperate issues. We have to deal with both parties at the ballot box, we can deal with terrorists in another manner.

 

I dunno, ask Daniel Pearl. Or Nick Berg. Or Eugene Armstrong, to name a few.

 

First of all, corruption in both parties is a fact, not an issue. Second point is I dont believe I was responding to your post. The third point is, if it is a choice to assume they are going to destroy our way of life, or depend on your numbers, guess which one I am going to choose. They arent locked up because they were at a square dance.

 

Exactly. Did you approve of that action?