Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Very well done. Nothing to add.
"In the New Testament, the writer of Hebrews raises Melchizedek’s profile to a pre-incarnate Christ-figure. Melchizedek is eternal, having no “father or mother” and “resembling the Son of God he continues a priest forever” (Heb. 7:3). Abraham’s tithe to Melchizedek also confirms his greatness (Heb. 7:4)."
"In the New Testament, the writer of Hebrews raises Melchizedek’s profile to a pre-incarnate Christ-figure. Melchizedek is eternal, having no “father or mother” and “resembling the Son of God he continues a priest forever” (Heb. 7:3). Abraham’s tithe to Melchizedek also confirms his greatness (Heb. 7:4)."
It is my personal understanding, Melchizedek was a man with no recorded geneology.
It is understandable that some of us may believe Melchizedek to be the preincarnate Christ, ". . . made like unto the Son of God . . . ."
I don't believe so. Instead I believe Melchizedek served as a type. The purpose of his use in Scripture is (in my view) to signify the priesthood of Christ apart from the Old Covenant Levitical system.Is Melchizedek in the Old Testament a Christophany?... Brother Glen
I believe Melchizedek served as a type.
Amen"Hebrews 7:15 Melchizedek is there as a type of Christ, king of Salem, i.e., Prince of Peace.
18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was priest of God Most High. Gen 14
15 And what we say is yet more abundantly evident, if after the likeness of Melchizedek there ariseth another priest, Heb 7
" “But made like unto the Son of God”, or, more literally “but assimilated to the Son of God”. It is very striking to note that it is not the Son of God who was “assimilated to Melchizedek”, but vice versa. In the order of time Christ subsisted before Melchizedek; in the order of nature, Melchizedek was a priest before Christ was. The priesthood of the Son of God, ordained and appointed by the Eternal Three, was the original, and Melchizedek’s priesthood furnished the copy, and a copy given in advance is the same thing as the type. Melchizedek was “assimilated to the Son of God” as a type.
First , as priest of the most high God.
Second , as being a royal priest, possessing personal majesty and authority.
Third , as being the king of righteousness.
Fourth , as king of peace.
Fifth , as the one who “blessed Abraham”.
Sixth , as the one who received the grateful gifts of God’s people represented by Abraham.
Seventh, as not owing his priesthood to natural genealogy.
Eighth, as abiding a priest beyond the bounds of the Levitical limitations. “Abideth a priest continually” (verse 3).
Note carefully it is not that the natural life of Melchizedek had no end, but that his priestly life did not cease at the age of fifty; in other words, he continued a priest to the very end of his earthly existence, which shows he had no vicar or successor, deriving a priesthood from his. “The expression ‘abideth a priest continually’, therefore, is the equivalent to saying that he had a perpetual priesthood in contradistinction from those whose office terminated at a definite period, or whose office passed over into the hands of others” (A. Barnes)."
CHAPTER - MELCHIZEDEK (godrules.net)"
Melchizedek
I don't believe so. Instead I believe Melchizedek served as a type. The purpose of his use in Scripture is (in my view) to signify the priesthood of Christ apart from the Old Covenant Levitical system.
As such, I believe his genealogy, background, and such were not recorded intentionally as Melchizedek stood outside of the Old Covenant people.
BTW...Jewish tradition views Melchizedek as Shem. (I don't....as I don't see a value in speculating....the point is no genealogy, outside the Levitical system).
Is Melchizedek in the Old Testament a Christophany?... Brother Glen
It is my personal understanding, Melchizedek was a man with no recorded geneology.
knowing that Christ, having been raised up out of the dead, doth no more die, death over him hath no more lordship; Rom 6:9
Does that above describe, the order of, the priesthood of Melchisedek?
Heb 7:23-25 YLT and those indeed are many who have become priests, because by death they are hindered from remaining; and he, because of his remaining -- to the age, hath the priesthood not transient, whence also he is able to save to the very end, those coming through him unto God -- ever living to make intercession for them.
5:5,6 so also the Christ did not glorify himself to become chief priest, but He who spake unto him: 'My Son thou art, I to-day have begotten thee;' as also in another place He saith, 'Thou art a priest -- to the age, according to the order of Melchisedek;'
Col 1:18 And himself is the head of the body -- the assembly -- who is a beginning, first-born out of the dead, that he might become in all things -- himself -- first,
Rom 8:29 because whom He did foreknow, He also did fore-appoint, conformed to the image of His Son, that he might be first-born among many brethren;
What order of priesthood will we be?
A. the order of Aaron
B. the order of Melchisedek
Agreed... Especially that it is quite understandable that some think him a Christophany."In the New Testament, the writer of Hebrews raises Melchizedek’s profile to a pre-incarnate Christ-figure. Melchizedek is eternal, having no “father or mother” and “resembling the Son of God he continues a priest forever” (Heb. 7:3). Abraham’s tithe to Melchizedek also confirms his greatness (Heb. 7:4)."
It is my personal understanding, Melchizedek was a man with no recorded geneology.
It is understandable that some of us may believe Melchizedek to be the preincarnate Christ, ". . . made like unto the Son of God . . . ."