Allan,
So you contend that Cain was sinless up to this point and that the sin nature in which we all share is was not attributed to Cain??
Again you read into what I said. I do not recall saying this. What I do know is that each time someone sinned and God was around, the sinner left. Adam left the gardan, Eve left the garden, after they sinned. Cain left the face of God when he sinned. Satan left the high plan in which he once was after he sinned. I see a trend here...do you?
A lie in the eyes of God is no different than murder because to God sin is sin. So even if Cain did not kill his brother he stood in the eyes of God a sinner, and unholy.
Sin is all around God in the sense that God is everywhere and all things are before His eyes.
See above post.
God has never liked sin but God uses it for His glory (as you state quite frequently). So if God hates it so much why use it and not cast it out??
Come now...God does hate sin. God has never made an attempt to conceal the fact of His wrath toward sin. Ever heard of the great flood? Ever heard of hell? What about those cities where lot lived...why were they hit with fire from above?
Deuteronomy 32:39-41
"See now that I myself am He! There is no god besides me. I put to death and I bring to life, I have wounded and I will heal, and no one can deliver out of my hand. I lift my hand to heaven and declare: As surely as I live forever, when I sharpen my flashing sword and my hand grasps it in judgment, I will take vengeance on my adversaries and repay those who hate me."
Psalm 7:11
"God is a righteous judge, a God who expresses his wrath every day."
Romans 1:18
"The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness."
God's wrath "… was revealed when the sentence of death was first pronounced, the earth cursed, and man driven out of the earthly paradise; and afterwards by such examples of punishment as those of the Deluge and the destruction of the Cities of the Plain by fire from heaven; but especially by the reign of death throughout the world." (A. W. Pink)
Psalm 130:3 "If you, O LORD, kept a record of sins, O Lord, who could stand?"
All things are before God, and that which God allows before him whether fallen or not is by His permission and lest we forget God decreed that sin will be and thereby He knew where it would come from and go to.
Indeed. I never said God did not know. Surely you know what I believe about Gods degees. As a matter of fact this is the point I'm trying to make, if you would just slow down a bit and drop you perset ways you may see this. Not that you have to agree. You are just way off track on what I'm asking others to consider.
I believe I can establish it was the 3rd Heaven (Gods abode) and that Satan known then as Lucifer was one of the the Covering Cherubs which is equated with Gods throne.
Well, it very well could be. My post was just to show what happened after sin. They were cast out.
Note all that God 'will' (future tense) do to Satan in his final judment, including casting him from the mount of God, and laying him before the kings.
Now look and see that all the sin Satan did was in the past tense, (italics) so though he had sinned and was IN his sin yet God says he is not yet cast down completely from the mount of God nor is he yet set before the kings as a vanquished foe. Yes Satan was cast from heaven but not from be allowed back and forth as God permits - such as the time when the sons of God presented themselves before the Lord. He can not come and go before God at will but according to Gods own words Satan is not yet cast from the mount of God completely. Jesus watched Lucifer fall from heaven but this does not mean Satan can not come before God as God permits.
He was not the Devil but was being used by him and the attributes of Satan correlated and were personified in the King (Prince) of Tyrus. So God in speaking to the King equates the same aspects of Satan and his sin to show this same picture of the King and his own pride. And just as Satan will be judged on day future so this King will to.
He will...and He Did.
You place to much on the word
will. Christ says...been there done that. Satan has been (past) cast from Heaven. Christ told us he saw it happen. Why? Well as it turns out God hates sin..and Satan sinned.
And what of those who are not believers. What of the elect yet saved as they to are sinners before God. Does God not have to touch them in some way to bring them unto Himself. What of those before Christ and even after as God will use sin to His glory and has even spoken to sinful man as well as been in their presence.
Christ already "
touched" the elects sin. This was called the
atonement. No need to take this to the C/A debate, but there are somethings we can agree on. I would hope.
Jesus was weighted down with the sins of the people … he was in awful agony, bloody sweat … His plea that there might be some other way , "Let this cup pass" …his last dreadful cry, "My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?" Who shall stand when the Son of God Himself so trembled beneath the weight of God's Wrath? God's Divine Wrath was revealed on the cross. God's true regard for sin was revealed in the sufferings and death of Jesus.
I would say Christ hates sin..no? And then what happened?
Luke 23
44 And it was about the sixth hour, and there was a darkness over all the earth until the ninth hour.
45 And the sun was darkened, and the veil of the temple was rent in the midst.
Hey this is from your arguments of God using both sinner and saint alike and that God even takes control (at times) of the sinner to do His will just as you contend God does with the Saints. (From the OP - Robots in Heaven)
I fail to see your point. I relent nothing about Gods soverignty, nor what I have said in the past about God being on the throne over His kingdom.
I have already established both in the previous posting IT IS and in this one. You fail to see what it has to do with the OP?? You asked is it the same, and I answer Yes. How is it not having anything to with the OP?? This entity is a Person and is designated by personal pronouns regarding an individual. If there is only one Devil and Satan by your own words, then who else is it refering?
Please show some support that you have establishing it being someone 'other than' Satan himself.
The word used is "adversary". In the KJV it is translated Satan.
Young Translation..
And the day is, that sons of God come in to station themselves by Jehovah, and there doth come also the Adversary in their midst.
We have gone over this before, and have show 2 times already where "Adversary" is not used as Satan in other passages. I am not saying you must agree, but after 3 times at this surely you now understand. So...let me ask again. KJV says this is satan, and it very well could be satan. Not another satan. If its "the satan", it is the satan. Now we got that out of the way lets reask the OP. Could the word Adversary be appled to another being other then "the one and only satan", just as it has been done in other passages?????
I never stated they could come and go as they please nor is it even infrenced in what I wrote. They can come and go as God permits, and IF God permits. Since God can be anywhere at anytime in all places at all times, I don't see it particulary NEEDFUL for them to HAVE to present themselves to God in Heaven before His throne. It 'SEEMS' it was a law??
No...
what you said was the devil can come to heaven. Other Gods can come to heaven. Sin has stained the walls of heaven...as if God has no holiness. You see it your way...I see God holy.
How does this work?? James, I thought you believed in Gods soveriegnty and nothing works without Gods express permission.
Yep...I said it. Still believe it. Any time someone changes the "set rules" as you see them, does not mean other things change.
Ok then, prove they are not angels.
You cannot prove a negative. The NIV says they are angels. No other translation says this, that I know of. Now they very well could be. I do not have a problem with this. I'm just entertaining the idea that they could be another super nature being. Prove it? I can't. I'm just placing it on the table for debate. Others seem to think its something to think about. That is all I'm doing myself. You will not hear of it. No big deal.
Show some supporting evidence and not conjecture or hypothosis that they are not Angelic beings spoken of in general.
I never said they were not angelic beings as in celestrial beings. I have said it maybe a being that we do not know what to call, other then sons of God.
In Christ...James