Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
A. W. Pink, in the articles compiled into "A Biblical Refutation of Dispensationalism," asserts that Abraham was a Gentile.
Who do you consider to be the first Jew?
Isaac?
Jacob (whose name became Israel)?
One of the twelve sons?
A. W. Pink, in the articles compiled into "A Biblical Refutation of Dispensationalism," asserts that Abraham was a Gentile.
Who do you consider to be the first Jew?
Isaac?
Jacob (whose name became Israel)?
One of the twelve sons?
It makes no sense to make a distinction between Abraham and everyone else after him as far as being a Jew is concerned. What a fruitless topic.
Perhaps in your view it is "fruitless."
The fact that A. W. Pink specified that Abraham was a gentile would then cause folks to perhaps consider the OP.
There is a children's song sung in churches called "Father Abraham," I have considered it problematic in doctrine.
Jesus rebuked the folks in His day for the "Father of Abraham" thinking.
Paul and James both use the term "father" and "Abraham" connected in their writings.
If it is so important to establish the linage of Jesus, the claim of the Israeli in the day of Jesus and the apostles, and the church being called the "Spiritual Israel," then it seems very important that folks know who the first Israeli was?
Who was the first Israeli?
Is there a spiritual aspect that needs to be determined in the matter?
Why are not the believers called Israeli-ites rather than Christians?
Is it a matter of first century derogatory demarcations, and what influence did the power holders have in the labeling?
Why would the modern church align itself with Abraham, which places Muslims on equal footing of claim, rather than Jacob in which a clear line leading to the promise of redemption is given in Scriptures?
Why would the modern church align itself with Abraham, which places Muslims on equal footing of claim, rather than Jacob in which a clear line leading to the promise of redemption is given in Scriptures?
One reason the Church aligns itself with Abraham is that Scripture does:
Galatians 3:29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.
As for Islam and Abraham: Any claim that Islam is an Abrahamic Religion is fiction and propaganda!
The first place in scripture Jew is used at least in KJV is 2 Kings 6:16
At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day.
At that time the house of Israel was an ally to the king of Syria.
IMHO Jew was a nickname the house of Israel gave to the house of Judah.
This was at least 130 years before Judah went into captivity.
The name Jew never applied to the house of Israel.
Jacob would have been the first Israelite when God changes his name to Israel.
All twelve tribes were the children of Israel. Jacob adopted the children of Joseph born to him in Egypt and named his name, Israel on them and gave to them the birthright he had taken from Esau. They are the house of Israel with the younger put over the older.
Good points.
It is also important to follow the derogatory term(s) of ethnic groups and in particular that of the Israeli.
Maybe ἀκροβυστία by their loving brothers,
Incidentally Pink was a recovering dispensationalist.
I've been gone a while:
I thought you were a dispensationalist..
Did you get your mind right?
Or more likely, I simply remember wrong.. Happens to me all the time.
A. W. Pink, in the articles compiled into "A Biblical Refutation of Dispensationalism," asserts that Abraham was a Gentile.
Who do you consider to be the first Jew?
Isaac?
Jacob (whose name became Israel)?
One of the twelve sons?
Adam, the first of God's chosen people