• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Who is the first Israeli?

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A. W. Pink, in the articles compiled into "A Biblical Refutation of Dispensationalism," asserts that Abraham was a Gentile.

Who do you consider to be the first Jew?

Isaac?
Jacob (whose name became Israel)?
One of the twelve sons?
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
A. W. Pink, in the articles compiled into "A Biblical Refutation of Dispensationalism," asserts that Abraham was a Gentile.

Who do you consider to be the first Jew?

Isaac?
Jacob (whose name became Israel)?
One of the twelve sons?

Judah the son of Jacob.
 

HeirofSalvation

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jacob....I would assume, it seems the obvious answer as explained in Genesis. Abraham was a "gentile" (sort-of), but the term "Gentile" would have had no meaning to that point...Adam was also a "gentile".
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
A. W. Pink, in the articles compiled into "A Biblical Refutation of Dispensationalism," asserts that Abraham was a Gentile.

Who do you consider to be the first Jew?

Isaac?
Jacob (whose name became Israel)?
One of the twelve sons?

Actually the first person identified as a Jew was one of those of the tribe of Benjamin taken to Babylon.

Esther 2:5. Now in Shushan the palace there was a certain Jew, whose name was Mordecai, the son of Jair, the son of Shimei, the son of Kish, a Benjamite;

Incidentally Pink was a recovering dispensationalist.
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
In the Scriptures, Jacob's name was changed to Israel; the "children of Israel" refer to his descendents.

The word "Jew" comes from the Hebrew word for one of the children of Jacob - Judah (Yehudah).

The progress from the "tribe of Judah" to the national recognition of "Jews" took many centuries.

Early "children of Israel" would not be called "Jews" because they were "Benjamites, Manassehites, Ephraimites, ..." The tribal grouping was very important and intermarriage between tribes was discouraged.

After the passing of Solomon, the splitting of the kingdom and eventual removal from the land somewhat consolidated the tribes; more was made of the unique call of Jacob/Israel as "God's people" rather than specific loyalty to specific tribal groupings. Though (even to this day) a certain "heritage" of tribe is held, the sum of the total is more important than the uniqueness of the subgroup.

Hence Mordecai was referred to as a "Jew;" however, the term was not used pleasantly. The term was used in derogatory and a corruption of the kingly family line of David (Yehudah to Yehu to Jew). It has continued even to the 21st century with certain degrading emphasis. When we say, "Ew," (as if something were stinky) that is continuing the corruption of the name of Judah and portraying the attributes of what some in the world would consider the Jews.

Because even in modern times the term "Jew" has a certain undercurrent of unpleasantness if spoken by a "gentile," the children of Israel folks prefer the term Israeli. They, as other ethnic groupings, will use a derogatory term in referring to themselves, but prefer it to be used only by fellow Israeli folks and not gentiles.
 

mandym

New Member
It makes no sense to make a distinction between Abraham and everyone else after him as far as being a Jew is concerned. What a fruitless topic.
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It makes no sense to make a distinction between Abraham and everyone else after him as far as being a Jew is concerned. What a fruitless topic.

Perhaps in your view it is "fruitless."

The fact that A. W. Pink specified that Abraham was a gentile would then cause folks to perhaps consider the OP.

There is a children's song sung in churches called "Father Abraham," I have considered it problematic in doctrine.

Jesus rebuked the folks in His day for the "Father of Abraham" thinking.

Paul and James both use the term "father" and "Abraham" connected in their writings.

If it is so important to establish the linage of Jesus, the claim of the Israeli in the day of Jesus and the apostles, and the church being called the "Spiritual Israel," then it seems very important that folks know who the first Israeli was?

Who was the first Israeli?

Is there a spiritual aspect that needs to be determined in the matter?

Why are not the believers called Israeli-ites rather than Christians?

Is it a matter of first century derogatory demarcations, and what influence did the power holders have in the labeling?

Why would the modern church align itself with Abraham, which places Muslims on equal footing of claim, rather than Jacob in which a clear line leading to the promise of redemption is given in Scriptures?
 

mandym

New Member
Perhaps in your view it is "fruitless."

The fact that A. W. Pink specified that Abraham was a gentile would then cause folks to perhaps consider the OP.

And how does Pink become the authority on this.,

There is a children's song sung in churches called "Father Abraham," I have considered it problematic in doctrine.

Ok?

Jesus rebuked the folks in His day for the "Father of Abraham" thinking.

The only thing I am aware of even remotely close to this thinking is when He rebuked the pharisees which had nothing to do with what you are talking about.

Paul and James both use the term "father" and "Abraham" connected in their writings.

Ok?

If it is so important to establish the linage of Jesus, the claim of the Israeli in the day of Jesus and the apostles, and the church being called the "Spiritual Israel," then it seems very important that folks know who the first Israeli was?

Matt 1:17 makes it clear

Who was the first Israeli?

??????

Is there a spiritual aspect that needs to be determined in the matter?

does scripture tell us there is?

Why are not the believers called Israeli-ites rather than Christians?

For crying out loud

Is it a matter of first century derogatory demarcations, and what influence did the power holders have in the labeling?

Why would the modern church align itself with Abraham, which places Muslims on equal footing of claim, rather than Jacob in which a clear line leading to the promise of redemption is given in Scriptures?

uh yea
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Why would the modern church align itself with Abraham, which places Muslims on equal footing of claim, rather than Jacob in which a clear line leading to the promise of redemption is given in Scriptures?

One reason the Church aligns itself with Abraham is that Scripture does:

Galatians 3:29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

As for Islam and Abraham: Any claim that Islam is an Abrahamic Religion is fiction and propaganda!
 

percho

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The first place in scripture Jew is used at least in KJV is 2 Kings 6:16

At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day.

At that time the house of Israel was an ally to the king of Syria.

IMHO Jew was a nickname the house of Israel gave to the house of Judah.

This was at least 130 years before Judah went into captivity.

The name Jew never applied to the house of Israel.

Jacob would have been the first Israelite when God changes his name to Israel.
All twelve tribes were the children of Israel. Jacob adopted the children of Joseph born to him in Egypt and named his name, Israel on them and gave to them the birthright he had taken from Esau. They are the house of Israel with the younger put over the older.
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
One reason the Church aligns itself with Abraham is that Scripture does:

Galatians 3:29 And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

As for Islam and Abraham: Any claim that Islam is an Abrahamic Religion is fiction and propaganda!

Good point!

I would suggest that the alignment is to "Abraham's seed" and not Abraham, himself.

The seed promise was Issac and not Ishmael. Through Issac (Israel) comes the messiah.
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The first place in scripture Jew is used at least in KJV is 2 Kings 6:16

At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day.

At that time the house of Israel was an ally to the king of Syria.

IMHO Jew was a nickname the house of Israel gave to the house of Judah.

This was at least 130 years before Judah went into captivity.

The name Jew never applied to the house of Israel.

Jacob would have been the first Israelite when God changes his name to Israel.
All twelve tribes were the children of Israel. Jacob adopted the children of Joseph born to him in Egypt and named his name, Israel on them and gave to them the birthright he had taken from Esau. They are the house of Israel with the younger put over the older.

Good points.

It is also important to follow the derogatory term(s) of ethnic groups and in particular that of the Israeli.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Maybe ἀκροβυστία by their loving brothers,

Let me see now.

I used to work for a Jew, not religious. Very fine man but he was not my brother. Not a believer.

Then there was my nephew, dated a young Jewish girl. She announced her conversion experience at a family reunion. Gave my nephew 3 fine boys, one thinks he may be called into the ministry. Saw him last week, believes time will tell.

Sadly my lovely Christian niece died two years ago after a 6 year struggle with Melanomia. Her faith during her struggle was marvelous to behold.

That being said I know a whole lot of Spiritual Jews!
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
I've been gone a while:

I thought you were a dispensationalist..

Did you get your mind right?

Or more likely, I simply remember wrong.. Happens to me all the time.

I have never been a dispensationalist. I believe the Grace of God kept me from that error. When I was saved I had and still have a fine friend, a Presbyterian elder, who steered me in the direction of the Thompson Chain Reference Bible to complement a text Bible I had been using.

I said that I believed that God in His grace kept me away from dispensational error. Here is South Carolina many folks grew up with Scofield. I suppose that is true elsewhere. Sadly the only thing many knew about dispensational error was the "Greaat Pre-Tribuulation Raaptuure". If I had used a Scofield Bible rather than a text Bible or the Thompson Chain Reference Bible who knows what would have happened. I like to think that Bible study would have steered me away from dispensational error just as it did away from my Arminian tendencies, but???

I go AWOL periodically. Getting that time again.
 

plain_n_simple

Active Member
A. W. Pink, in the articles compiled into "A Biblical Refutation of Dispensationalism," asserts that Abraham was a Gentile.

Who do you consider to be the first Jew?

Isaac?
Jacob (whose name became Israel)?
One of the twelve sons?

Adam, the first of God's chosen people
 
Top