• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Who Wrote Book of Hebrews

37818

Well-Known Member
Yes, good point.. The writer of Hebrews makes it clear he did not hear the gospel from Christ but from those who heard Him.

This would be a bit odd for Paul to say given that he repeatedly claimed the status of being an Apostle out of time, having heard Jesus speak after the Ascension.

This doesn't exclude Paul but you're correct that it makes it very unlikely Paul write Hebrews.
Paul was not yet a Bellevuer. during Matthew 4;17.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
Yes, good point.. The writer of Hebrews makes it clear he did not hear the gospel from Christ but from those who heard Him.

This would be a bit odd for Paul to say given that he repeatedly claimed the status of being an Apostle out of time, having heard Jesus speak after the Ascension.

This doesn't exclude Paul but you're correct that it makes it very unlikely Paul write Hebrews.
Paul was not yet a believer during Matthew 4;17.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Paul was not yet a Bellevuer. during Matthew 4;17.
Yes. Many were not Chriatians before Jesus called the first Disciples (Matthew 4:17).

My point is that Paul maintained that he heard from Jesus on earth as an Apostle "out of time" (Jesus appeared to him) whereas the writer of Hebrews seems to recount strictly secondhand knowledge of Christ.

You are correct that this fact makes Paul unlikely the writer as many more (like Apollos, Barnabas, Clement, etc.) related the gospel they heard from others.
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
Yes. Many were not Chriatians before Jesus called the first Disciples (Matthew 4:17).

My point is that Paul maintained that he heard from Jesus on earth as an Apostle "out of time" (Jesus appeared to him) whereas the writer of Hebrews seems to recount strictly secondhand knowledge of Christ.

You are correct that this fact makes Paul unlikely the writer as many more (like Apollos, Barnabas, Clement, etc.) related the gospel they heard from others.
Which seems to be confirmed by the author stating that the apostles were able to confirm the gospel by their signs and wonders, but that he seemed to see that as being past now, as already confirmed
 

37818

Well-Known Member
Yep. None of the Disciples were believers prior to Matthew 4:17. This was before Jesus called the Disciples.
Amongst those disciples were the ones that author cited, ". . . that heard him; . . ." from that beginning, Hebrews 2:3, Matthew 4:17.
.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Amongst those disciples were the ones that author cited, ". . . that heard him; . . ." from that beginning, Hebrews 2:3, Matthew 4:17.
.
Matthew 4:17 is just before Jesus called the first Disciples. Hebrews 4:17 simply states that the "us" heard from those who heard Jesus.

Paul claimed to have heard Jesus (this was a major point Paul made). So yes, it woukd be odd for Paul to shift to a secondhand disciple as he rested his authority as an Apostle from his experience.

The writers that the early Christians suggested heard Jesus' words from others.

In the end, we can't know who wrote Hebrews (the human writer). Paul is unlikely but possible if dictated and summarized by another. But those the early Christians suggested may be more probable candidates.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
I am persuaded the authorship of Hebrews to be the Apostle Paul.

And I am persuaded Hebrews 2:3, . . . which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him; . . . , and so does not eliminate Paul's authorship.
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
I am persuaded the authorship of Hebrews to be the Apostle Paul.

And I am persuaded Hebrews 2:3, . . . which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him; . . . , and so does not eliminate Paul's authorship.
The author though there implies that he was not an apostle
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Not true.
The 1611 KJV credits Paul as the author and Timothy as it's writer.
How is this no evidence?
It isn't evidence because that is not Scripture. It is in the KJV because of the RCC (because of Augustine and Jerome). Paul was believed to be the writer from the 4th century until the 16th century (with a resurgence of Greek studies).

It is a reason some believe Paul is the writer, but it is not evidence.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
It isn't evidence because that is not Scripture.
So. does this mean logical deductions are not allowed?
The Apostle Paul was first to cite "Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee. Acts of the Apostles 13:33.

Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee, Hebrews 1:5.

Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee. Hebrews,5:5.

Being the sole citations in the NT Scripture of this resurrection prophecy.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
My point is that Paul maintained that he heard from Jesus on earth as an Apostle "out of time" (Jesus appeared to him) . . . .
But not from when, . . . great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, . . . .
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
So. does this mean logical deductions are not allowed?
The Apostle Paul was first to cite "Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee. Acts of the Apostles 13:33.

Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee, Hebrews 1:5.

Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee. Hebrews,5:5.

Being the sole citations in the NT Scripture of this resurrection prophecy.
What I mean is that is not evidence. Paul did not invent Scripture. Paul didn't write Acts, but there Paul's words are recorded. How did Luke know Paul spoke those words? Did Luke stop and say "Paul....nobody knows what you said so write it here"?

The verse in Psalm is about Jesus. The writer of Hebrews could have been inspired by Paul's speech. Paul could have got it from the writer of Hebrews.

Or maybe the human writers were inspired by the same Spirit.


Opinions are allowed. But that is not evidence (especially since Hebrews appears in language and topic so different from Paul's known epistles).
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
But not from when, . . . great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, . . . .
Point is this does not point exclusively to Paul. In fact, had you not cut off the verse you'd see it points away from Paul (although Paul could be the writer via another).

"God also testifying with them, both by signs and wonders and by various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit according to His own will"

Paul insisted that God testified to him, personally, with signs and miracles. The writer of Hebrews relies on God testifying to those who heard and relayed the gospel to them.
 
Top