-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Who's fault is it Hillary lost?
- Thread starter Revmitchell
- Start date
-
- Tags
- i do not like tags
It's Bush's fault!!!
The campaign ended about 6 weeks ago. I can't remember what Hillary ran on, except "Donald Trump is unfit to be President". Her slogans were dumb, "Stronger Together" and "Love Trumps Hate". I'm having a hard time remembering what issues she emphasized--raising the minimum wage, but not to $15, expanding health care, creating a no-fly zone in Syria, raising taxes on the wealthy. Otherwise I can't recall much about it.
Trump, on the other hand, was going to "Make America Great Again" by building a wall, deporting illegals, banning Muslim immigration, cutting both personal and corporate taxes, building infrastructure, cutting regulations, etc. It was easy to remember, easy to digest.
Hillary only has herself to blame. It was a terrible campaign.
Trump, on the other hand, was going to "Make America Great Again" by building a wall, deporting illegals, banning Muslim immigration, cutting both personal and corporate taxes, building infrastructure, cutting regulations, etc. It was easy to remember, easy to digest.
Hillary only has herself to blame. It was a terrible campaign.
The end.
The voters.
The Russians allegedly changed the vote tallies. There's going to be an investigation (I hope) on that. In addition Comey had no grounds for bringing up the topic of emails again right before the election. He said that but too late to remove the impact of that lie on this election. The people spoke and Hillary won the popular vote. The difference in the electoral vote is explained by my two previous points.
Adjust your tin foil hat.
What is the source of said allegations
I doubt if there will be a public transparent investigation of the election because both sides probably have nasty stuff on their boots.
The best thing that may come of it is bipartisan election reform.
HankD
Who has said this? Link, please.
There is a lot of evidence which has led to a bi-partisan request for an independent commission to investigate this. Here's one pointer to that possibility. There are many others. http://time.com/4600177/election-hack-russia-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/
You said the Russians "changed the vote tallies". What do you mean by that? I took you to mean that they hacked the voting machines.
Uh none of this is true.
This is probably fake news FTW.
The Russian "behind the scenes" influence and the propping up of the wiki-leaks, hacking the DNC and leaking stuff on their own, is the most likely method they used.
It is possible for the Russians (actually the Ukrainians) to have "hacked" those voting machines connected to the web (if any) but unlikely.
HankD
The Russian "behind the scenes" influence and the propping up of the wiki-leaks, hacking the DNC and leaking stuff on their own, is the most likely method they used.
It is possible for the Russians (actually the Ukrainians) to have "hacked" those voting machines connected to the web (if any) but unlikely.
HankD
The Russians had nothing to do with it.