Major B said:This article http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75717, about a new book by a University of Texas economist, sheds some light on the mortgage mess and what caused it.
I certainly agree and it's right in line with what I've been saying based upon my own observations.
There was a time when getting a home loan was difficult but then the social re-engineering efforts started forcing changes to the time-tested qualifications in order to make housing "more affordable". Before that time somewhere around one third of non-farm homes were owned by their occupants. The government interference accelerated with the New Deal era with federally insured long term loans with low down payments. Before that loans were short term and required considerable equity.
It did increase the percentage of home ownership. It did, in some areas, increase the quality of home construction because of the standards imposed on the builders by the government's insurance program.
Then in more recent times the bar was lowered even more to provide mortgage finance with very low down payments, low closing costs, and adjustable interest rates or repayment schedules to people with much higher debt to income ratios that in the past. This was, as the article states, done to target specific demographics of our society.
Many of these people might could afford them at first but just could not handle it long term and especially in a market when the home inflation trend changed direction leaving people with little or no equity. They didn't have the cash reserves to ride out the inevitable storm.
Everyone must share in the blame - Congress, the lenders, and the borrowers. They've all had an active part in it. The Executive will get blamed the most but, in reality, they only implement the programs that Congress creates.
I wouldn't look to Congress for a solution. Their track record is extremely poor!