Excuse me but I still do not see what you are saying. It sounds like how trinity is explained. I understand everything you are saying and agree, until you make it sound as if the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit are separate beings.Therefore, the “ONE” in 1 John 5:7, John 10:30, and John 17:11 cannot refer to ONE in BEING. Why? Because Deut. 6:4 gave us already a hint that it is not and John 17:11 proves that it is not.
As I have said before, ONE IN UNITY is used in the case of Gen. 2:24, when the husband and wife were called ONE by God. How can the two in number, be One? This is possible only in the sense of UNITY.
We can understand John 10:30 in this sense, “I and my Father are one.” One in Unity not in number. It is also in this sense that the thousands can be one like the builders of the tower of Babel in Gen 11:6. Even the millions of Christians can be one in this sense according to John 17:21.
Unless of course our Apologizers here will agree that there are three separate persons in the Trinity or there are three beings in the Trinity then a “collective one” is possible.
In other words, “collective one” or “compound unity” can only be applied to anything that is at least numerically TWO entities. But God is NOT numerically THREE entities, according to their distorted traditional religious view. God is numerically ONE entity based on their doctrinal faith.
Therefore, obviously, they are misapplying the usage of the Hebrew word “ECHAD” (collective one) in Deut. 6:4 to their flawed traditional concept of Trinity.
:godisgood:
Be patient please, something you say in explaining more could be just the right way that makes it more understandable.