Why are Republicans their devotees using cheap shots?

[KenH]

Gotta link?

 

[ajg1959]

Gotta link?

There are many, but here is one

http://www.husseinandterror.com/

AJ

 

[KenH]

Thanks.

However, I still don't think that invading Iraq was the right thing to do.

 

[poncho]

Could it be because there really is not that much difference in action in the parties?

Could it be that the differences only extend to pronouncements, policies, and platforms and don't extend to performance?

Could the GOP be saying the 'right' thing to insure that they don't lose the massive Evangelical vote?

Could it all just be politics?

The simple answer is because that's what they've been trained to do. Good doggies. Wag wag.

 

[Bible-boy]

Got any proof?

Yes, the issue has been fully discussed in this thread: http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=51868

There are several posts that contain links to sources which prove that Saddam's Iraq had 550 tons of yellow cake, had other WMDs that were shipped to Syria etc., and hosted/sponsored a terrorist training camp.

Now can we stop running down rabbit trails and return to the discussion of the OP's subject?

 

[LadyEagle]

First, you have made an accusation that the GOP and its supporters are using "cheap shots," but you failed to identify of the supposed "cheap shots." So at this point the OP just looks like a cheap shot...

Agreed and after several pages, I have yet to find links to these alleged cheap shots. And the thread is off topic. So it's closed.

 

[LadyEagle]

Reopend by request. LE

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

While the thread was closed I opened a thread to clarify any misunderstanding that might exist in what I was saying.

Click here for that thread.

I am happy enough to have this thread closed now and the discussion moved there, but I try not to moderate or admin threads that I start or where I am involved in the debate.

Thanks to LE for giving me the chance to explain myself.

 

[dragonfly]

It would be very difficult for me to do so, even though it is only the VP and would only affect policy in case of the untimely demise of McCain. So voting for a pro-life/pro-abortion ticket is not the same as voting for a pro-abortion/pro-abortion ticket. But yes, it would be difficult for me to do so, and I would have to think about it. In contrast, you have no difficulty in voting for a pro-abortion candidate. In fact, you openly celebrate such a decision as if it provides special meaning in your life, as evidenced by your pervasive posts on this board regarding your love for and hope in the man, Obama.

Yes, I will do all that I can to see that Obama is elected in November.

I'm thinking that this Palin pick just might do the trick to getting McCain defeated. I am certain that the pro-choice crowd will rally to keep this religious, right-wing ticket from entering the White House. In fact, while on the BB yesterday, I donated some money to Moveon.org just for the specific purpose of defeating McCain.

 

[LadyEagle]

While the thread was closed I opened a thread to clarify any misunderstanding that might exist in what I was saying.

Click here for that thread.

I am happy enough to have this thread closed now and the discussion moved there, but I try not to moderate or admin threads that I start or where I am involved in the debate.

Thanks to LE for giving me the chance to explain myself.

You're welcome, Roger. It's now closed. Please carry further discussions to the other thread.

LE