• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why did God slaughter these children?

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I appreciate that. And I do believe that some of us could have fruitful discussion about this. But I'm not sure I want to open this up. I don't really enjoy conflict. I don't mind strong disagreement. I think we often learn by such, but some people are just waiting to throw out false charges, attacks, etc. That would make anything I post counterproductive.



Let me at least pose this question, to you and anyone else who might wish to respond: Are you quite certain that those verses describe an actual, literal, historical occurrence?


Go spend quality time with a rabbit!! How can you deny the literal scripture.
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
.
Let me at least pose this question, to you and anyone else who might wish to respond: Are you quite certain that those verses describe an actual, literal, historical occurrence?

I see no reason to believe it wasn't a literal event.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Go spend quality time with a rabbit!! How can you deny the literal scripture.


He isn't denying the literal scripture. He is saying perhaps that passage is was not meant literally. Surely you know not all passages are literal in "literal" interpretation (eg pearls before swine, sun standing still, throwing children's food to the dogs).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Dr. Bob

Administrator
Administrator
:type:

All need to BE CAREFUL with your language to one another. Giving out many infractions on this thread and some will be on the outside looking in.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
I believe that the mocking/threatening of God's man by a mass mob from a town that practiced idolatry wasn't so much an affront to Elisha as it was to God.

I think that perhaps this is the issue, and point, of the passage.
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Can someone kindly explain to me why this passage is not literal? I interpret it literally and interpret it to be that many youths got mauled by bears.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
Can someone kindly explain to me why this passage is not literal? I interpret it literally and interpret it to be that many youths got mauled by bears.

I'm also curious as to non-literal interpretations of what happened to the "yutes" (as Vinney would say).
 

McCree79

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm also curious as to non-literal interpretations of what happened to the "yutes" (as Vinney would say).
That movie is hilarious!

On a serious note. I would also like to hear Rebel's interpretation here.
 

Rebel

Active Member
That movie is hilarious!

On a serious note. I would also like to hear Rebel's interpretation here.

I would like to, but considering that posts #34 and #38 are still here while mine was edited, showing that justice was not equally applied, I'll decline. Now if this injustice gets corrected, I'll answer. Is this like football: The one who retaliates always gets flagged instead of the instigator?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

thjplgvp

Member
Perhaps the passage is to be interpreted allegorically. The prophet is a picture of the church and because he is bald indicates the church has lost its power (similar to the hair cutting and the Nazarite vow) the two bears are a type of Magog being split into two different groups of nations in the last days and the 42 youth who are mauled is a sign of what Magog will do to the Middle eastern nations who come against him in the last days.

I love allegory as opposed to literal cause it makes a much better story. (I am being sarcastic here :wavey: )
 
Top