Why do protestant groups insist on saving people that don’t need saving…?

[Linda64]

Originally posted by dcorbett:
Baptists are not Protestants, by the way. We were never part of the mother harlot church, the one in Rome. Ana-Baptists were tortured, burned, drowned, and their blood was shed over and over for refusing to conform to the catholic and reformed churches, yes, even the church of england. Bibles were chained to the pulpits in those other churches so the common man could not find the truth about saving GRACE, but the Ana Baptists and Mennonites and the Brethren mamaged to keep authentic copies of the Textus Receptus hidden so that the papists and so called "reformers" couldn't eliminate the real Bible. Martin Luther and Calvin killed thousands of Baptists, did you know that?

Yes I did know that. Amen--great post!

Not alot of people do know that--even those who call themselves Baptists. I recently found out (about a year ago) when I was doing some study on Baptist history. Thank you dcorbett for posting that--even though I am finding it a little late.

 

[Chemnitz]

Yes I did know that. Amen--great post! [thumbs] Not alot of people do know that--even those who call themselves Baptists. I recently found out (about a year ago) when I was doing some study on Baptist history. Thank you dcorbett for posting that--even though I am finding it a little late.

Why are you thanking somebody for posting something that is false. Luther didn't kill anybody nor did he advocate killing people. Not to mention the fact that he used the TR for the NT portion of the German Translation.

 

[Eliyahu]

Matt,
Here I continue the way of proving and Onus Probandi.

1. Case of Jesus
Jews brought the false witnesses and they said Jesus said " I am able to destroy the temple of God, and to build it in three days"
Another witness say "we found this fellow perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar (Luke 23:2)
What if we didn't have the New Testament but had only the witnesses by the High Priest and his fellow witnesses? Could we judge fairly about Jesus?

2. Case of Nestorius.

Nestorius was condemned as Heretic, denying Theotokos. RC often claimed that he insisted 2 persons lived in Jesus Christ. Now the documents discovered in 1895 reveals quite differently from what was thought to be Nestorian belief.

Look at this:

http://moses.creighton.edu/okeefe/THL531/projects02/Christolgy5thC/Introduction_files/Nestorius.htm

http://mb-soft.com/believe/txc/nestoria.htm

3. Conclusion
One can hardly evaluate and judge someone or some groups belief without their own writings.
If Albigenes were so harmful that they had to be masacred and killed, and their properties had to be confiscated, then there must have been any literatures or writings. Why didn't RC preserve them and reveal their own writings?
It is absolutely because Albi was right but RC was heretic! Therefore they didn't want to reveal the truth.
This is why Gamaliel prohibited the people from punishing or killing the disciples and said
" But if it be of God,ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God" ( Acts 5:39)
God doesn't force any one believe His truth.
Jesus prohibited Swearing, but you notice RC was forcing the people swear.
If anyone committed any civil offense such as murder or adultery, then they deserve the punishment. Otherwise, they should have been left free. RC was not confident with their own belief and teachings for themselves because they knew that they themselves were wicked and tricky, forging the false theories, full of Idolatry, disobeying the Words of God.
If they were faithful with the Words of God, they would have not killed so many Albi's.