Why do we need Planned Parenthood ?

[billwald]

Someone please explain exactly how the trees of the field will clap their hands.

 

[billwald]

>The Creationist position is creation of the soul at conception, not birth.

Why would God create a soul for a collection of undifferentiated cells which God knew that God would abort a week later?

 

[poncho]

I'm not an "ignore" kind of guy.

Besides, at one point, we were told that posts that supported baby-killing weren't welcome here.

Mods, you know I'm not a complainer, and I'm appreciative of the job you do, but I'll ask again:

How can you allow someone with as reprehensible, satanic a view as billwald has on this issue remain here--not only not banned, but completely undedited?

Mods??

Note from editor: I will review the rules on this one, bring it before the administrators if there is a question and let them make the final decision. I simply have to follow the rules and if there is one regarding this issue, then I can act--otherwise I will push it on up for an administrative decision. (Note: This has nothing to do with my beliefs, it is simply board operations.)

ITL ignores anyone who disagrees with his views or proves them wrong.

I whupped him good in a debate about central banking couple weeks ago, so of course I wound up on his ignore list. :laugh:

 

[carpro]

ITL ignores anyone who disagrees with his views or proves them wrong.

I whupped him good in a debate about central banking couple weeks ago, so of course I wound up on his ignore list. :laugh:

I believe I got the same treatment...for the same reasons.:laugh:

 

[Havensdad]

>The Creationist position is creation of the soul at conception, not birth.

Why would God create a soul for a collection of undifferentiated cells which God knew that God would abort a week later?

Don't know; why would He allow a soul for a fully formed baby that is going to die of infection an hour after he or she is born? Why would he allow a soul for a baby who cannot even talk or reason yet? I don't know, but I do know that I will see all of them in Heaven, nonetheless.

Picking a particular stage of human development as "the" defining characteristic of soul competency is preposterous. When the baby is conceived, they have a soul, you sick, demented little man.

Baby murder is wrong at any stage.

 

[Arbo]

>The Creationist position is creation of the soul at conception, not birth.

Why would God create a soul for a collection of undifferentiated cells which God knew that God would abort a week later?

And why does he allow people like you to advocate evil? We don't know. That doesn't change the fact that He does what He does.

 

[mandym]

>The Creationist position is creation of the soul at conception, not birth.

Why would God create a soul for a collection of undifferentiated cells which God knew that God would abort a week later?

First you work to reduce the value of human life by down playing the reality of its existence and being, Then you further work to down play the value of human life by suggesting the short time span would make it less valuable. A human unborn child is not a collection of undifferentiated cells. shame on you.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

>The Creationist position is creation of the soul at conception, not birth.

Why would God create a soul for a collection of undifferentiated cells which God knew that God would abort a week later?

The same reason he gives a soul to the baby he knows will die of lukemia before being old enough to make a decision.


FTR; I like Bill Wald, and don't want to see him banned. I am convinced he is saved.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

There are a few current posters I am convinced are NOT saved. It would do no good to ban Bill, and let the few there are no questions about linger here and spread the discord they do.

That being said, I disagree with him on this here issue.

 

[billwald]

I whupped him good in a debate about central banking couple weeks ago, so of course I wound up on his ignore list.

Please refresh my memory. Which debate? What new concept did you propose that I ignored. How many times should I write the same thing to people who don't understand plain English Neither will I respond to my typos or yours when your intent seems obvious. I don't laugh at other people's typos).

YOUR objective is to have the last word and then you win.

MY objective is to stir the pot into a frenzy and then back away and watch you all spin your wheels trying to get the last word.

MOST NONE of you are on this list to learn anything. MOST ALL of you are on this list in order to "be right."

 

[carpro]

I whupped him good in a debate about central banking couple weeks ago, so of course I wound up on his ignore list.

Please refresh my memory. Which debate? What new concept did you propose that I ignored. How many times should I write the same thing to people who don't understand plain English Neither will I respond to my typos or yours when your intent seems obvious. I don't laugh at other people's typos).

YOUR objective is to have the last word and then you win.

MY objective is to stir the pot into a frenzy and then back away and watch you all spin your wheels trying to get the last word.

MOST NONE of you are on this list to learn anything. MOST ALL of you are on this list in order to "be right."

:laugh: Pull in your horns, BW. Bro. Curtis wasn't even referring to you.

 

[InTheLight]

ITL ignores anyone who disagrees with his views or proves them wrong.

I whupped him good in a debate about central banking couple weeks ago, so of course I wound up on his ignore list. :laugh:

A question to the dear readers and contributors of Baptist Board. Think about the posts made by Poncho and BillWald over the time you've known them. Would you say that they "whup" people in debates? (No need to answer publicly, just consider the question.)

If anyone cares, here is the thread where Poncho claims he 'whupped" me.

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=70427

You can pick it up at about post #27 or so.

I put people on ignore that are so far out in their beliefs that there is no reason to read them any more. For example, conspiracy theory people will get put on ignore. People that say abortion is OK (third trimester or otherwise) will get put on ignore. I also put people on ignore that personally insult me (or insult or demean other posters regardless of their positions.)

I do not put people on ignore that disagree with me or prove me wrong.