No doubt, yet the wrath remains as seen in the pouring out of the Revelation bowls.It was God theFfather pleasure and will that His own Son endured the wrath intended for lost sinners in order to secure them a sure salvation.
One is obligated to consider (as some holding to wrath poured out upon Christ) that the crucifixion was sufficient for all and effective for a few. I don’t find that presentation consistent with Scriptures either.
Therefore, because the wrath remains, the crucifixion cannot be only about the “wrath” part of penal substitution, rather reflect other valid presentations such as has been noted.
I do not dispute Christ was treated with wrath, the humans did all that prophets described and all that the demonic efforts could exert. He was victorious, the substitute, the redeemer, ....
It is also important to visit the very last written account to see God’s expressions at that final judgment.
That scene is not wrath, but of court judgment. Evidence is shown, and those condemned already are cast into an eternity of the second death and torment. Again not in wrath, but in judgment’s execution of the verdict of condemned in unbelief.