• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why I DON"T Support Universal Healthcare Coverage

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
You realize that Mass. has been using a health care system very similar to the one Obama is proposing for about 4 years now, right? What disaster has happened there that warrants this kind of paranoia? The answer is none. You just hate our country's first black president. A lot of people hated Kennedy because he was a Catholic so i understand.



Question, alatude, what do you blame for the bi-partisan rejection of the Clinton health care bill ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

alatide

New Member
Question, alatude, what do you blame for the bi-partisan rejection of the Clinton health care bill ?

Do you realize that Mass. has had a health care system that requires that everyone have health care insurance for 4 years?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

targus

New Member
A did you know that the Massachusetts plan is a FAILURE?


"MASSACHUSETTS HAS been lauded for its healthcare reform, but the program is a failure. Created solely to achieve universal insurance coverage, the plan does not even begin to address the other essential components of a successful healthcare system.

What would such a system provide? The prestigious Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of Sciences, has defined five criteria for healthcare reform. Coverage should be: universal, not tied to a job, affordable for individuals and families, affordable for society, and it should provide access to high-quality care for everyone.

The state's plan flunks on all counts."

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/e...9/03/02/mass_healthcare_reform_is_failing_us/


"The survey of roughly 4,000 adults found that, after seeing initial gains in affordability, an increasing percentage of residents are now reporting problems paying medical bills. It also found that a rising number of residents, especially those with lower incomes, are reporting that they did not get needed care because of costs, which are rising faster than inflation."

http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma...esidents_report_trouble_paying_medical_bills/
 

matt wade

Well-Known Member
Do you realize that Mass. has had a health care system that requires that everyone have health care insurance for 4 years?


In February 2008 the Boston Globe reported that Commonwealth Care covered 169,000 people and had a projected cost of $618 million for the fiscal year. By June 2011 enrollment is projected to grow to 342,000 people at an annual expense of $1.35 billion. The original projections were for the program to ultimately cover approximately 215,000 people at a cost of $725 million.

In March 2008 the Boston Globe reported that some "safety-net" hospitals serving low-income individuals in urban areas were facing budget shortfalls due to the combination of reduced "free-care" payments from the state and low enrollment in Commonwealth Care.

Health care costs in the state were rising at an annual rate of 10 percent, and the state budget deficit was $1.3 billion.

Massachusetts' problem of overcrowded waiting rooms and overworked primary-care physicians (who were already in short supply) has been exacerbated by the influx of patients now covered.One criticism of the program is that it has done nothing to realign incentives for MDs to provide primary care.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform
 

alatide

New Member
A did you know that the Massachusetts plan is a FAILURE?


"MASSACHUSETTS HAS been lauded for its healthcare reform, but the program is a failure. Created solely to achieve universal insurance coverage, the plan does not even begin to address the other essential components of a successful healthcare system.

What would such a system provide? The prestigious Institute of Medicine, part of the National Academy of Sciences, has defined five criteria for healthcare reform. Coverage should be: universal, not tied to a job, affordable for individuals and families, affordable for society, and it should provide access to high-quality care for everyone.

The state's plan flunks on all counts."

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/e...9/03/02/mass_healthcare_reform_is_failing_us/


"The survey of roughly 4,000 adults found that, after seeing initial gains in affordability, an increasing percentage of residents are now reporting problems paying medical bills. It also found that a rising number of residents, especially those with lower incomes, are reporting that they did not get needed care because of costs, which are rising faster than inflation."

http://www.boston.com/news/local/ma...esidents_report_trouble_paying_medical_bills/

Another view.

WSJ

SEPTEMBER 18, 2009, 6:04 A.M. ET
Massachusetts Is a Health Reform Model
Our system insures 97% of state residents.
By DEVAL L. PATRICK

When we in Massachusetts set out to change our system, some were afraid. People almost always fear change, and politicians sometimes seize on that fear to prevent it. But in an act of political courage, a Democratic senator, a Republican governor and a Democratic state legislature formed a broad coalition with health-care providers, medical experts, business and labor leaders and patient advocates to fundamentally reform our system. And we have maintained our coalition as we've moved forward. After many years of widespread dissatisfaction with the old health-care system, we realized that a perfect solution or the status quo were not our only choices.
Because of our reform, over 97% of Massachusetts residents are insured—the highest rate of coverage of any state in the nation. Our residents now have better access to preventive care in lower cost primary-care settings. Employers have expanded coverage for workers, not retreated as some feared. Families are less likely to be forced into bankruptcy by medical costs. Most importantly, lives have been saved. This is all good news for our residents, as well as for our state's long-term economic prosperity.
Opponents of reform claim that the Massachusetts experiment is too costly. They are wrong. State estimates and independent analysis from the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation concur that health-care reform has only added moderate incremental costs to the state budget. As more of our residents have become insured, there has been a decrease in demand for costly emergency-room care. Even in the midst of the current economic downturn, our state budget was balanced.

But the real issue is not the incremental costs of expanding coverage. It's the fact that medical costs—even for those who have always had insurance—are rising too fast.

Massachusetts is poised to lead the nation in addressing this problem, too. A special state commission has unanimously recommended moving away from the "fee for service" practice that drives up costs and fragments care, and replacing it with an alternative payment strategy designed to reward doctors and hospitals for providing coordinated care that achieves the best health outcomes for patients and lowers costs. As we work to translate this vision into practice, health care in the state will just get better.

We are proud of our success in Massachusetts. But we are also deeply committed to supporting federal health-care reform that will tackle costs and establish important patient protections to guard against some of the worst insurance-industry practices, including exorbitant out-of-pocket expenses, co-pays and deductibles that drive many families into bankruptcy. Working families and businesses have been waiting too long for relief.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm, Not A Racist...

You realize that Mass. has been using a health care system very similar to the one Obama is proposing for about 4 years now, right? What disaster has happened there that warrants this kind of paranoia? The answer is none. You just hate our country's first black president. A lot of people hated Kennedy because he was a Catholic so i understand.

For you to call me a "racist" is truly wrong. You're judgemental in a hateful way, and like the Democrats and Joe Wilson, you owe me an apology!
 

targus

New Member
alatide, all your article says is that what they promised would fix health care did not do it.

Now they are putting out the next promise that they say will fix health care.

Guess what? It won't.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You Speak the Truth....

alatide, all your article says is that what they promised would fix health care did not do it.

Now they are putting out the next promise that they say will fix health care.

Guess what? It won't.

AMEN...You said a lot in a very short space, brother. I :applause: you!
 

Winman

Active Member
So you like the Massachusetts model do ya?

Health-care costs continue to rise much faster in Massachusetts than in the nation as a whole. Proponents of the reform promised that it would reduce costs. Gov. Mitt Romney said "the cost of health care would be reduced" and the plan would make health insurance "affordable" for every Massachusetts citizen. Supporters went so far as to suggest that the reforms would reduce the price of individual insurance policies by 25 to 40 percent. In reality, since the program became law, insurance premiums have been increasing by 10 to 12 percent per year, nearly double the national average. On average, health insurance costs $16,897 a year for a family of four in Massachusetts, compared to $12,700 nationally. Meanwhile, total health-care spending in the state has increased by 28 percent.

And you hate how much you are paying now?
 

Twizzler

Member
From wikipedia
In March 2008 the Boston Globe reported that some "safety-net" hospitals serving low-income individuals in urban areas were facing budget shortfalls due to the combination of reduced "free-care" payments from the state
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_health_care_reform#Outcomes

It's so simple, why can't you see that the plan itself is what's making health care costs spike!? When the STATE is telling the health industry what they'll pay for a specific procedure and then FORCE them to accept that for that procedure, the hospitals have no alternative but to pass the costs that aren't covered by state reimbursements on to others!

The State is guilty of fraud and theft.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
I will take that as an ultimate compliment! TYVM, Alatide. To answer your crazy question... "Nope... I'm me, Tom, from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, not OldRegular, but thanks for asking."

No, actually Old Regular and I are the same person. We went to different schools together. If you turn to the Sci-Fi Channel, you can occasionally catch episodes of the Twilight Zone.


No I am Old Regular - I used to be GARBC :thumbsup:
Didn't you see that eposide of "To Tell the Truth"

Thanks for the help fellows! Every time I go off my meds these people keep popping up. As long as they are not like "whoever" I guess it is Okay!
 
Top