• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why jesus never received mary's blood

Matt22:37-39

New Member
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/BTP/D...emistry/04.htm

BLOOD IS PASSED DOWN FROM THE FATHER NOT MOTHER THAT IS WHY JESUS HAD NO SIN!


The Chemistry Of The Blood

"The life Is In The Blood

M.R. DeHaan, M.D.


JESUS SINLESS

The Bible teaches in addition that Jesus was a SINLESS man. While all men from Adam to this day are born with Adam’s sinful nature, and, therefore, are subject to the curse and eternal death, the Man Jesus was without sin and, therefore, DEATHLESS until He took the sin of others upon Himself and died THEIR death. Now while Jesus was of Adam's race according to the flesh yet He did not inherit Adam's nature. This alone will prove that sin is not transmitted through the flesh. It is transmitted through the blood and not the flesh, and even though Jesus was of the "Seed of David according to the flesh" this could not make him a sinner.


God has made of ONE BLOOD ALL THE NATIONS of the earth. Sinful heredity is transmitted through the blood and not through the flesh. Even though Jesus, therefore, received His flesh, His body from a sinful race, He could still be sinless as long as not a drop blood of this sinful race entered His veins. God must find a way whereby Jesus could be perfectly human according to the flesh and yet not have the blood of sinful humanity. That was the problem solved by the virgin birth.

ORIGIN OF THE BLOOD

It is now definitely known that the blood which flows in an unborn babies arteries and veins is not derived from the mother but is produced within the body of the fetus itself only after the introduction of the male sperm. An unfertilized ovum can never develop blood since the female egg does not by itself contain the elements essential for the production of this blood. It is only after the male element has entered the ovum that blood can develop. As a very simple illustration of this, think of the egg of a hen. An unfertilized egg is just an ovum on a much larger scale than the human ovum. You may incubate this unfertilized hens egg but it will never develop. It will decay and become rotten, but no chick will result. Let that egg be fertilized by the introduction of the male sperm and incubation will bring to light the presence of LIFE IN THAT EGG. After a few hours it visibly develops. In a little while red streaks occur in the egg denoting the presence of Blood. This can never occur and does never occur until THE MALE SPERM HAS BEEN UNITED WITH THE FEMALE OVUM. The male element has added life to the egg. Life is in the blood according to scripture, for Moses says:
"For the life of the flesh is in the blood." (Leviticus 17:11). "For it is the life of all flesh; the blood of it is for the life thereof."

Leviticus 17:14

Since there is no life in the egg until the male sperm unites with it, and the life is in the blood, it follows that the male sperm is the source of the blood, the seed of life. Think it through.


NO MOTHERS BLOOD

For this very reason, it is unnecessary that a single drop of blood be given to the developing embryo in the womb of the mother. Such is the case according to science. The mother provides the fetus (the unborn developing infant) with the nutritive elements for the building of that little body in the secret of her bosom, but all the blood which forms in that little body is formed in the embryo itself and only as a result of the contribution of the male parent. From the time of conception to the time of birth of the infant not ONE SINGLE DROP OF BLOOD ever passes from mother to child. The placenta that mass of temporary tissue known better as “afterbirth,” forming the union between mother and child is so constructed that although all the soluble nutritive elements such as proteins, fats, carbohydrates, salts, minerals and even antibodies pass freely from mother to child and the waste products of the child's metabolism are passed back to the mothers circulation, no actual interchange of a single drop of blood ever occurs normally. All the blood which is in that child is produced within the child itself as a result of the introduction of the male sperm. The mother contributes no blood at all.

TESTIMONY OF SCIENCE

Now for the sake of some of the skeptics who may doubt these statements let me quote from a few reliable authorities. In Howell’s Textbook of Physiology, Second Edition, pages 885 and 886, I read:
"For the purpose of understanding its general functions it is sufficient to recall that the placenta consists essentially of vascular chorionic papillae from the foetus (the unborn child) bathed in the large blood spaces of the decidual membrane of the mother. The fetal and maternal blood DO NOT COME INTO ACTUAL CONTACT. THEY ARE SEPARATED FROM EACH OTHER by the walls of the fetal blood vessels and the epithelial layers of the chorionic villae."

Or let me quote from Williams’ Practice of Obstetrics, Third Edition, page 133. Here I quote,
"The fetal blood in the vessels of the chorionic villae AT NO TIME GAINS ACCESS TO THE MATERNAL BLOOD in the intervillous space, BEING SEPARATED FROM ONE ANOTHER by the double layer of chorionic epithelium."

And from page 136 of the same recognized textbook I quote,

"Normally there is no communication between the fetal blood and the maternal blood."

Now for the benefit of those of you who may be nurses, let me quote from a textbook which is familiar to you. Quoting from "Nurse’s Handbook of Obstetrics" by Louise Zabriskie, R.N., Fifth Edition, page 75:
"When the circulation of the blood begins in the embryo, it remains separate and distinct from that of the mother. All food and waste material which are interchanged between the embryo and the mother must pass through the blood vessel walls from one circulation to the other."

And from page 82 of the same book --
"The fetus receives its nourishment and oxygen from the mothers blood into its own through the medium of the placenta. The fetal heart pumps blood through the arteries of the umbilical cord into the placental vessels, which, looping in and out of the uterine tissue and lying in close contact with the uterine vessels, permit a diffusion, through their walls, of waste products from child to mother and of nourishment and oxygen from mother to child. As has been said, this interchange is effected by the process of osmosis, and there is no direct mingling of the two blood currents. In other words, no maternal blood actually flows to the fetus, nor is there any direct fetal blood flow to the mother."
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
But you are missing one important biological issue: the baby never receives the father's blood as well. You see, the baby receives the father's DNA contribution - 1/2 of the chromosomes that a human being needs. The mother contributes the other 1/2. Sperm will never produce a human being on it's own nor will an egg. It needs BOTH to create a human being.

So your premise is wrong.
 

Deacon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As much as I enjoy the simple teachings of M. R. De Haan, he made a good decision to give up his medical practice and become a preacher.

Many lives were saved :smilewinkgrin:

Rob
 

Deacon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There's a very good response in the following article:

The flesh and blood of the Lord Jesus Christ was true humanity, yet He was without sin (Heb 4:15; 9:28). Any theory that would indicate that the physical blood He shed was not true blood of sinless humanity, but was divine blood with mystical power functioning in some magical form disgraces the Gospel and trivializes the redeeming work of the Lord Jesus. There is indeed great value and worth to the blood of Christ, and it cannot be esteemed enough, but attributing mystical and pagan attributions to it may degrade the shedding of His blood.

Ron J. Bigalke Jr., The Error of Divine and Mystical Attributions with Regard to the Blood of Christ. Journal of Dispensational Theology Volume 13. 2009 (39) (57). North Richland Hills, TX: Tyndale Theological Seminary. page 39

Rob
 

Matt22:37-39

New Member
Yeah I thought about this as well...I'm not real up on this one, so I find the answers interesting. I was taught this early on in my walk, so I'm not sure how it all works.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yeah I thought about this as well...I'm not real up on this one, so I find the answers interesting. I was taught this early on in my walk, so I'm not sure how it all works.

Basic biology. A human body contains 23 pairs of chromosomes in every cell except sperm and egg cells which contain 23 SINGLE chromosomes. When the egg and sperm meet and the sperm penetrates the "shell" of the egg, the two sets of 23 single chromosomes now make a complete set - thus 1/2 of the genetic material comes from the mother and 1/2 comes from the father. BOTH are involved in the creating of new life.
 
The secret things belong to the LORD our God, but those things which are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law.
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
All the mitochondrial DNA comes from the mother of the child.

In sexual reproduction, mitochondria are normally inherited exclusively from the mother. The mitochondria in mammalian sperm are usually destroyed by the egg cell after fertilization. Also, most mitochondria are present at the base of the sperm's tail, which is used for propelling the sperm cells. Sometimes the tail is lost during fertilization. In 1999 it was reported that paternal sperm mitochondria (containing mtDNA) are marked with ubiquitin to select them for later destruction inside the embryo.[4] Some in vitro fertilization techniques, particularly injecting a sperm into an oocyte, may interfere with this.

The fact that mitochondrial DNA is maternally inherited enables researchers to trace maternal lineage far back in time. ( Y-chromosomal DNA, paternally inherited, is used in an analogous way to trace the agnate lineage.) This is accomplished on human mitochondrial DNA by sequencing one or more of the hypervariable control regions (HVR1 or HVR2) of the mitochondrial DNA, as with a genealogical DNA test. HVR1 consists of about 440 base pairs. These 440 base pairs are then compared to the control regions of other individuals (either specific people or subjects in a database) to determine maternal lineage. Most often, the comparison is made to the revised Cambridge Reference Sequence. Vilà et al. have published studies tracing the matrilineal descent of domestic dogs to wolves.[5] The concept of the Mitochondrial Eve is based on the same type of analysis, attempting to discover the origin of humanity by tracking the lineage back in time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_DNA
 

billwald

New Member
TRUE! This is how genetics traced the human species back to one family who came out of Africa. Probably a very "black" family. Our "white" breeds were an evolutionary response to emigration to the high latitudes - vitamin D deficiency. Black people now living in the high latitudes need to take vitamin D pills for best health.
 
Top