• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why Obama is pulling ahead amongst Demcrats

JamieinNH

New Member
Ps104_33 said:
As much as I hate to admit this, Ron Paul is starting to look good to me.

That's good to hear you say. You just went up a notch with respect to me. I like Ron Paul and continue to do so, but to know there are people that either didn't take notice of him, or have seen that although not a perfect candidate, can see how he would be a better choice than the ones still in the running is encouraging.

To me, it shows people eventually won't settle for the lessor of two evils.. one day we will pick a President that will actually be what they say and do what they say. This would surely help the country get back on it's stately feet again.

Thanks!

Jamie
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
Ps104_33 said:
Obama is appealing to a young crowd who is falling for his rhetorical gimmicry.

That's hardly the extent of Obama's appeal. He is appealing to all ideologies, ages, and socio-economic levels among Democrats. And he is appealing to a vast number of independents and even moderates among Republicans. And, of course, a growing number of libertarians. :smilewinkgrin:
 

Tama

New Member
C4K said:
I realise you are new here.

In the future please refer to posters by their screen name, not a corruption of it.

Sorry. Just a joke. I'll most likely never do that again! :smilewinkgrin: :praying:
 

Tama

New Member
KenH said:
That's hardly the extent of Obama's appeal. He is appealing to all ideologies, ages, and socio-economic levels among Democrats. And he is appealing to a vast number of independents and even moderates among Republicans. And, of course, a growing number of libertarians. :smilewinkgrin:

But what are the specific issues that bolster his appeal?
 

Ps104_33

New Member
Sorry. Just a joke. I'll most likely never do that again! :smilewinkgrin: :praying:

You will find that people are very thinned-skinned around here. Get used to it and just go along and you will be fine.:thumbs: I dont know why thin-skinned people would hang around the politics section of this board but what are you going to do.
 

Tama

New Member
Ps104_33 said:
You will find that people are very thinned-skinned around here. Get used to it and just go along and you will be fine.:thumbs: I dont know why thin-skinned people would hang around the politics section of this board but what are you going to do.

Thanks for the advice.

Yeah... I have to keep in mind that this isn't the "Fighting" forum. :smilewinkgrin:
 

Tama

New Member
KenH said:
I like an American foreign policy that puts the interests of these United States first and stays away from foreign adventurism. Senator Obama explains his foreign policy quite well here:

www.foreignaffairs.org/20070701faessay86401/barack-obama/renewing-american-leadership.html?mode=print

I guess I have never heard the phrase "foreign adventurism." Makes it sound like we send our troops to war for the "adventure" of it as opposed to the protection of our interests.

Either way........ I appreciate the foreign policy of the current administration for which I credit our safety since 9/11.
 

StefanM

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Tama said:
Either way........ I appreciate the foreign policy of the current administration for which I credit our safety since 9/11.

Would this be the same policy that has stretched our forces so thin that we are unable to complete the task in Afghanistan, unable to fully stabilize Iraq, and unable to fully respond to a major attack on us, were it to occur?

Would this be the same policy that has alienated us from our allies overseas, thereby undermining our overall security?

Surely you're speaking of another policy.
 

Tama

New Member
StefanM said:
Would this be the same policy that has stretched our forces so thin that we are unable to complete the task in Afghanistan, unable to fully stabilize Iraq, and unable to fully respond to a major attack on us, were it to occur?

Would this be the same policy that has alienated us from our allies overseas, thereby undermining our overall security?

Surely you're speaking of another policy.

I am speaking of the policy that has kept our country safe. No attacks on our soil for nearly seven years!

These "tasks" take time. I know we live in a microwave age and we tend to lack patience but our troops are doing the job and great progress continues to be made.

By the way. We still have troops in Germany.

Why do you think the war on terror is no longer in the headlines? Because the liberal media cannot bring themselves to report about the progress.

That........ is the policy that I am speaking about.
 

Dagwood

New Member
Tama said:
I am speaking of the policy that has kept our country safe. No attacks on our soil for nearly seven years!

These "tasks" take time. I know we live in a microwave age and we tend to lack patience but our troops are doing the job and great progress continues to be made.

By the way. We still have troops in Germany.

Why do you think the war on terror is no longer in the headlines? Because the liberal media cannot bring themselves to report about the progress.

That........ is the policy that I am speaking about.

How many of our troops in Germany were killed by the German people last year?
 

Magnetic Poles

New Member
Dagwood said:
How many of our troops in Germany were killed by the German people last year?
Well, I guess I have to applaud Bush for keeping us safe from the Germans. They haven't attacked any Americans since 1945. :laugh:
 

Tama

New Member
Dagwood said:
How many of our troops in Germany were killed by the German people last year?

The point is.......... we will keep a military presence in Iraq....... long after the stability is secured......... just as we did in Germany and many other areas of the globe.

Are you denying the progress since the surge? Because if you are........... you will have little credibility.
 

Dagwood

New Member
Tama said:
The point is.......... we will keep a military presence in Iraq....... long after the stability is secured......... just as we did in Germany and many other areas of the globe.

Regardless of how many troops we have in Iraq, it was a mistake to invade them and we need to leave as soon as possible.

Are you denying the progress since the surge? Because if you are........... you will have little credibility.

The surge is only temporary. What will happen when we leave, or are you suggesting that we have troops in Iraq indefinitely?
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
Tama said:
I guess I have never heard the phrase "foreign adventurism." Makes it sound like we send our troops to war for the "adventure" of it as opposed to the protection of our interests.

Invading Iraq had nothing to do with protecting the interests of these United States. It was a war of choice, not necessity, and an extremely awful choice at that.
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
Tama said:
Are you denying the progress since the surge?

The purpose of the surge was to provide time for political progress to be made. If the Iraqis don't succeed politically then the surge will have been for naught.
 
Last edited:

Justlittleoldme

New Member
Tama said:
I am speaking of the policy that has kept our country safe. No attacks on our soil for nearly seven years!

These "tasks" take time. I know we live in a microwave age and we tend to lack patience but our troops are doing the job and great progress continues to be made.

By the way. We still have troops in Germany.

Why do you think the war on terror is no longer in the headlines? Because the liberal media cannot bring themselves to report about the progress.

That........ is the policy that I am speaking about.

:applause: Couldn´t have said it better myself.
 
Top