• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why Provisionism Is Not Biblical

DaveXR650

Well-Known Member
Where in scripture do you see this "direct work of the Holy Spirit upon a person to directly open their mind or enlighten or convict."
This is all over scripture. I'll refer you to Edwards who accompanies his work with numerous scriptures. You don't accept my examples, and you know that so believe as you wish.
You can point to Lydia but she already knew and trusted in God. She learned about Christ but she was already saved or do you think faith in God is not enough?
She was in that odd and short time where people who were true God followers had not yet heard of Jesus and did not understand his work. So I wouldn't go so far as to say she was saved before knowing about Jesus but at the same time she was not like Paul started out - as an enemy. But you certainly see the Holy Spirit's hand in bringing her in. That was my point.
God provides many means of influence as I have pointed out before but you seem to think He has to force man to change their mind about Him. That is not biblical.
No. I'm just saying the influence is in addition to what Dr. Flowers claims. He tends to leave it at the Holy Spirit providing physical helps like scripture, preachers, and so on. As to forcing man, look at a non-Calvinist like C.S. Lewis in his testimony. I agree with him in that for us to claim we are searching for God is like a mouse claiming he is searching for a cat. That simply is not the way it works. Do Calvinists go too far in their terminology sometimes? Probably.
Influence is not causation. What do you think Flower's was saying regarding the work of the Holy Spirit?
No, it's not. But if it is essential then it was the deciding factor. Flowers seems even uncomfortable with direct influence, thus going beyond classic Arminianism. He is in disagreement with the great Baptist preachers, as well as the Baptist founders, and Wesley. It is what it is but that's the truth.
Pelagianism teaches that humans have the inherent ability to choose good and seek God without the need for divine grace, denying the concept of original sin. This view emphasizes that salvation is achieved through individual effort and moral choices rather than through God's grace alone.
I don't know about the nuanced theological definitions. You'd have to look at the You Tube Dr. Cooper, the Lutheran put up if it's still available. What I think Dr. Flowers believes is that being provided with the information about Christ and what he did, we can then evaluate that and decide to come to Christ or not to. I think he believes that the work of the Spirit was in accomplishing the "Provision" of this information. I don't agree with that. I think the Spirit does more.
Flower's having been a calvinist would be well aware of that point of view and now strives to point out the errors found in it.
I agree with you there. And that is the basis for my only beef with him. I see him raise questions that are at a level that any Calvinist could easily answer and frame them as gotcha questions, when he knows that is easily explained. He also has a bad habit of quoting others out of context and then playing excerpts that make it appear they are in agreement with him.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
This video might show what I mean. It's from C.S. Lewis and he is describing in this clip what I consider work of the Holy Spirit as apart an in addition to the provision of the documents and the information. My contention is that we don't tend to go in this direction without the direct action of the Spirit. In the clip, which is a dramatic rendition of Lewis's words, you can see the outside of himself enlightening occurring, even though Lewis never claimed to be a Calvinist.

Have you seen the whole movie?

I understand where you are coming from but I do think you take it a bit to far. Does the Holy Spirit convict people? Yes. Does God present various means by which to draw people to Himself? Yes. That is not in dispute by myself or Flower's as I have seen in his videos.

Where, imo, you error is that you think the Holy Spirit has to act in such a way that the person could not do other than to trust in God. The calvinist irresistible dragging of one to God.

We are told in Romans that man is without excuse because we have creation, God also convicts us of our sin plus whatever other means He chooses to use to draw people to Himself. But at the end of the day it is still the man that has to choose to trust in or reject Him. Whatever response the person makes is his responsibility.

It would seem that you want to limit the influence of God to just the work of the Holy Spirit but God uses various means to waken people to Him. These can even include sickness, dreams, the gospel shown through Christians. It seems to me that the calvinists as a whole want to limit the love of God, the outreach of God.

Does the man save himself? NO he does not. But as we see in scripture God saves those that believe in Him that respond to His drawing.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
So, in your world, Jonah 2;9 says-
But I will sacrifice unto thee with the voice of thanksgiving; I will pay that that I have vowed. Salvation is of the ----Man!.;);):oops:

Have you even read my posts. If you had then you would know you have just made a really dumb comment.

Why do you continue to use strawman arguments Z?

I have posted numerous verses that show the truth of scripture but it seems you do not actually trust the word of God as written but only as your calvinist teachers tell you what it means.

It is sad that you cannot help being the way you are Z.
 

Zaatar71

Well-Known Member
Have you even read my posts. If you had then you would know you have just made a really dumb comment.

Why do you continue to use strawman arguments Z?

I have posted numerous verses that show the truth of scripture but it seems you do not actually trust the word of God as written but only as your calvinist teachers tell you what it means.

It is sad that you cannot help being the way you are Z.
I See SH, you are a new disciple of JOHNC, lol. JohnC says I am not a Calvinist, so I am in the clear, lol
So you follow the bogus teaching, I follow the Puritans, as JohnC is infallible in his pronouncements!
 

DaveXR650

Well-Known Member
Have you seen the whole movie?
Yes. It is excellent. I actually heard about from my pastor, who is a fan of C.S. Lewis. It's on Amazon Prime and I think YouTube.
Where, imo, you error is that you think the Holy Spirit has to act in such a way that the person could not do other than to trust in God. The calvinist irresistible dragging of one to God.
I happen to think grace is resistible. The WCF on this is confusing in that they seem to say that because it is essential then it was irresistible in those of us who get saved but for the rest there was grace given that was indeed resisted. Probably true but not really satisfactory in my mind.
We are told in Romans that man is without excuse because we have creation, God also convicts us of our sin plus whatever other means He chooses to use to draw people to Himself. But at the end of the day it is still the man that has to choose to trust in or reject Him. Whatever response the person makes is his responsibility.
I believe in Romans it is referring to knowledge that God exists and that there is right and wrong, not that there is any innate knowledge or knowledge drawn from observing creation that can lead to salvation.
It would seem that you want to limit the influence of God to just the work of the Holy Spirit but God uses various means to waken people to Him. These can even include sickness, dreams, the gospel shown through Christians. It seems to me that the calvinists as a whole want to limit the love of God, the outreach of God.
I believe all those things are in operation. And I do believe some Calvinists can rightly be called out for limiting God's love in ways we never were authorized to do. But all don't. You find plenty of free grace taught by guys like Horatius Bonar, works like "The Marrow of Modern Divinity", Bunyan's work, and so on. I also include guys like J.C. Ryle who clearly wrote that if you reject the offer of the gospel it is on you, not God.
Does the man save himself? NO he does not. But as we see in scripture God saves those that believe in Him that respond to His drawing.
Yes and my only concern with Dr. Flowers is that he has said plenty that indicate he believes this drawing is not a direct drawing by the Spirit but is more of using "means" as he says in the video you posted. If you have time look at Jordan Cooper, the Lutheran's, videos responding to Flowers. But they are very long and he rambles. Once again, I don't have any dislike for Dr. Flowers and his videos are worth watching whether you agree with him or not. I just saw this thread and thought I would add my thoughts for what they are worth. In my opinion, the battling between Baptists and Reformed Baptists has become a great tragedy, at least in America.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
I See SH, you are a new disciple of JOHNC, lol. JohnC says I am not a Calvinist, so I am in the clear, lol
So you follow the bogus teaching, I follow the Puritans, as JohnC is infallible in his pronouncements!

Na your a calvinist that just loves to make false claims. Your obvious lack of understanding of the word of God gives you away every time.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
I happen to think grace is resistible. The WCF on this is confusing in that they seem to say that because it is essential then it was irresistible in those of us who get saved but for the rest there was grace given that was indeed resisted. Probably true but not really satisfactory in my mind.
That bit of logic is confused to say the least.

I believe in Romans it is referring to knowledge that God exists and that there is right and wrong, not that there is any innate knowledge or knowledge drawn from observing creation that can lead to salvation.
Those that trust in God will be saved. We see this in the OT and it still is in the NT.

I believe all those things are in operation. And I do believe some Calvinists can rightly be called out for limiting God's love in ways we never were authorized to do. But all don't. You find plenty of free grace taught by guys like Horatius Bonar, works like "The Marrow of Modern Divinity", Bunyan's work, and so on. I also include guys like J.C. Ryle who clearly wrote that if you reject the offer of the gospel it is on you, not God.
I think that is one of the biggest flaws in calvinism. They seem to think God misspoke when He said He send His son so that the world could be saved through faith in Him.

The ULI of the tulip is a purely man-made theory that,imp, has caused more harm to the name of God than just about anything going.

As I see it some will hold to that theory regardless what the word of God says.

Yes and my only concern with Dr. Flowers is that he has said plenty that indicate he believes this drawing is not a direct drawing by the Spirit but is more of using "means" as he says in the video you posted. If you have time look at Jordan Cooper, the Lutheran's, videos responding to Flowers. But they are very long and he rambles. Once again, I don't have any dislike for Dr. Flowers and his videos are worth watching whether you agree with him or not. I just saw this thread and thought I would add my thoughts for what they are worth. In my opinion, the battling between Baptists and Reformed Baptists has become a great tragedy, at least in America.
 

Zaatar71

Well-Known Member
Na your a calvinist that just loves to make false claims. Your obvious lack of understanding of the word of God gives you away every time.

Your arrogance is showing Z.
How you understand them is not the test Z. It is what do they actually say.
I have found that when people cannot answer what biblical Calvinists offer, the charge usually comes out...you are arrogant. It could be true, or more likely, the non cal is embarrassed when he gets an answer he cannot refute.
You have been answered on the verses you offered. That you refuse to face the truth, you offer them without understanding. I and others have explained to you over ,and over.
For Example, you offer EPH.1:13, as if it is a stand alone verse that you can ascribe a meaning too.
The problem is Eph! does not start at verse13. verse 13, is a part, of one long sentence.Eph1:3-14 is one sentence in the original language. To fail to understand, rip it out of context, leads to a wrong understanding, that you own. It is not arrogant to present this truth. Truth is truth. So when I say I actually understand it, I do. You ignore truth, then you remain ignorant of truth. Next, you will speak of "philosophy" rather than scripture like your teacher. lol
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
I have found that when people cannot answer what biblical Calvinists offer, the charge usually comes out...you are arrogant. It could be true, or more likely, the non cal is embarrassed when he gets an answer he cannot refute.
You have been answered on the verses you offered. That you refuse to face the truth, you offer them without understanding. I and others have explained to you over ,and over.
For Example, you offer EPH.1:13, as if it is a stand alone verse that you can ascribe a meaning too.
The problem is Eph! does not start at verse13. verse 13, is a part, of one long sentence.Eph1:3-14 is one sentence in the original language. To fail to understand, rip it out of context, leads to a wrong understanding, that you own. It is not arrogant to present this truth. Truth is truth. So when I say I actually understand it, I do. You ignore truth, then you remain ignorant of truth. Next, you will speak of "philosophy" rather than scripture like your teacher. lol
What you understand is the calvinist misunderstanding of the text.

Notice carefully the term “IN HIM”. Verse 13 tells us how one comes to be IN HIM. Notice the order:
1. “And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation.”
They heard the truth…the gospel.

2. “When you believed, you were marked IN HIM with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit”
They were mark IN HIM after they believed.


Eph_1:4 For He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world to be holy and blameless in His presence. In love
Eph_1:7 In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of His grace
Eph_1:11 In Him we were also chosen as God’s own, having been predestined according to the plan of Him who works out everything by the counsel of His will,
Eph_1:13 And in Him, having heard and believed the word of truth—the gospel of your salvation—you were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit,

Clearly, Paul is saying that those who are IN HIM (through faith) are predestined to become holy (sanctified) and adopted (glorified). The text says nothing about God predestining some individual to believe the gospel so as to be IN HIM, as Calvinism reads into the text.


God chooses to include the individual into the group when they believe the truth. The individual is personally included by God’s gracious choice. God is not obligated to do this; it is purely a gracious action for God to include repentant believers in Christ.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
To read the Puritans, is a bit of work, but they offer much God given insight. To not use such resources usually leads to people drifting from truth.

So you trust the words of man over the words of God. I prefer to go to the source rather than the ones writing about the source.

While commentaries can be useful they are not to replace the actual word of God.
 

Zaatar71

Well-Known Member
What you understand is the calvinist misunderstanding of the text.
ok, I will play this game today,let's see what you got!
Notice carefully the term “IN HIM”. Verse 13 tells us how one comes to be IN HIM. Notice the order:
1. “And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation.”
That is not what it says.........you were included in him when > Is not in the text ! Why are you perverting the text???
The word included is not in the text, as if it is speaking of the time of their election.This is speaking about after being effectually called, they were SEALED...not Elected, after they believed.
They heard the truth…the gospel.
yes all who believe hear the gospel under normal circumstances
2. “When you believed, you were marked IN HIM with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit”
The sealing is the result of believing...It does not address the Election portion which you avoid, by seeking to word it as if the believing causes election.
They were mark IN HIM after they believed.
Not what it says....they were sealed, after
Eph_1:4 For He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world to be holy and blameless in His presence. In love
That is Election, that is when it happened to believers,
Eph_1:7 In Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of His grace
Eph_1:11 In Him we were also chosen as God’s own, having been predestined according to the plan of Him who works out everything by the counsel of His will,
We were elected to be In Union with Christ...IN HIM
Eph_1:13 And in Him, having heard and believed the word of truth—the gospel of your salvation—you were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit,
Now you get it right, After the work of the Spirit, [In HIM]they heard and believed and were sealed.
Clearly, Paul is saying that those who are IN HIM (through faith) are predestined to become holy (sanctified) and adopted (glorified).
yes, like the golden chain of rom.8;29-30, the same order of events....Whom He did Foreknow, He also did Predestinate

The text says nothing about God predestining some individual to believe the gospel so as to be IN HIM, as Calvinism reads into the text.
you are looking at the text, backward to forward, adding words to twist or wrest the scripture to pervert it to say what you would like it to say, rather than what it does say, because you hate the truth that God has revealed in scripture.
God chooses to include the individual into the group when they believe the truth.
That is a perversion, that your friend leighton , and others try to foist on the text.
The individual is personally included by God’s gracious choice. God is not obligated to do this; it is purely a gracious action for God to include repentant believers in Christ.
In this perverted scenario, you want it to say that! The Church, or assembly, are individual living stones, that God has elected , and fashioned into His body or assembly.
19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;


20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;


21 In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:


22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.
The corporate group and individuals fitly framed together.
1pet2:5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.

:rolleyes::Sick:Redface
 

Zaatar71

Well-Known Member
So you trust the words of man over the words of God.
You believe the slander of JohnC which is not a winning formula. JohnC insults Calvinists on a daily basis, each Calvinist can attest to that,and has no idea what he is posting half the time. You can believe what he posts at your own peril.
I prefer to go to the source rather than the ones writing about the source.
It does not look as if you went to the source this time. If JohnC or leighton is your source, you have been hoodwinked,
While commentaries can be useful they are not to replace the actual word of God.
when you read the actual word of God, then get back to me!
 

JD731

Well-Known Member
I don't think I would use Thomas as an example of being saved. He was a chosen follower of Jesus before Jesus had accomplished his work on the cross and thus the situation cannot be compared to later evangelism.
I have given some thought to your reasoning here Dave and I think this post highlights what is wrong with Calvinism and why it should be rejected as the Christian faith. You have not used your great IQ that God blessed you with to reason out what happened to those apostles on the day that Jesus Christ rose from the dead.

It seems a man like you could follow their thread through the remainder of the NT scriptures and put together an understanding of how they were like the rest of the church and how their ministry was unique. I think wilful ignorance is the culprit in your case. You are too intelligent to be led around by religionists who promote the writings of men, all of which corrupt the sound teaching of the Bible. I am speaking of Calvinism here.

On resurrection day something happened to these 10 men that had happened to no other man except Adam. God, Jesus Christ, breathed the Holy Ghost, Spirit, if you like that better, into their bodies. Now, what ever you think about these men, they were different from that event going forward. You cannot have God indwelling you and be the same. Neither can you expect that these men could have previously had the Spirit dwelling in them if it took the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ to accomplish it. The idea is absurd. Then eight days later the one holdout, doubting Thomas, was given the Spirit and it was at this time that Jesus said that he, meaning the Spirit in them, would never leave them nor forsake them and he would always be with them. We know from that statement that they would not be like Adam, who had the Spirit from his creation only to have him depart because he introduced sin into himself and the world. The act of the cross was Jesus Christ, the second man and last Adam putting sin away by suffering the consequences of it, death to the body and death to the soul, the first and second deaths, and then being raised from the dead because he had no personal sins that could condemn him. Sin in them can now be cleansed by his blood and washed away and the body can and does become the temple of the Spirit for the believer. Now, these men will always be 1,2,3, body, soul, and the Spirit of Christ, one in three and thee in one, like unto Jesus Christ and God and in his image.

I have read past these lines, Dave, and the story does not end there. These same men were those chosen to be eye witnesses of his resurrection and those who would be charged to make his death, burial, and incredible resurrection known. They would write about it and all men from that time forward, including you and me, would get their understanding of God's plan going forward.

I have read about these men. There are prophecies and information about these men that is said about no other men in history or eternity. What is said about them relates both to the earthly kingdom of Jesus Christ that is to come when Jesus returns as King of the Jews and by extension the King of the nations. They are also the foundation of the church of Jesus Christ, laid upon him, the chief cornerstone at his resurrection. So, this shows that the kingdom of God is both spiritual and physical but one kingdom in heaven and earth.


Mt 19:27 Then answered Peter (speaking of the band of 12 apostles) and said unto him, Behold, we have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore?
28 And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.

The 12 are dead and buried and the regeneration has not happened yet. This means they will have to be raised from the dead if they are really going to sit on twelve thrones of Israel, and so will Israel. Israel was raised from the dead nationally in 1948 AD but they are not saved and Jesus has not returned. We are told they will be saved at his return and every citizen left alive will be born again and those who are not will be killed.

11 And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear.
12 He said therefore, A certain nobleman (Jesus) went into a far country (heaven) to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.
13 And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.
14 But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.
15 And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading..............................................................................................................

.......................................................................................................................26 For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.
27 But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.
28 And when he had thus spoken, he went before, ascending up to Jerusalem. (Prophetically to inaugurate the kingdom)

What about the church in relation to these political officers of the kingdom of Christ? Take a look.

Eph 2:13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
14 For he is our peace, who hath made both (gentile & Jew) one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;
15 Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;

16 And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:
17 And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh.
18 For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.

19 Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;
21 In whom all the building (the church) fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:
22 In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.


I doubt there ia a Calvinist alive today who believes what we are told about these men because they do not believe the words they read that these men were told by God to write. They are now the foundation of the church and they will be kings over the 12 tribes of Israel when Jesus comes to establish his kingdom. There is no reason to doubt what these men has told us.

I have confidence that you can process this but I am not sure you will.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
ok, I will play this game today,let's see what you got!
What game Z?

The word included is not in the text, as if it is speaking of the time of their election.This is speaking about after being effectually called, they were SEALED...not Elected, after they believed.
They became part of the elect when they were sealed.

yes all who believe hear the gospel under normal circumstances
You have it backwards Z. They hear the gospel and then they believe. You cannot believe in something you know nothing about.

The sealing is the result of believing...It does not address the Election portion which you avoid, by seeking to word it as if the believing causes election.
When one believes and is sealed by the Holy Spirit they become part of the elect.

Not what it says....they were sealed, after
So you do not understand the word marked Z?

That is Election, that is when it happened to believers,
So you have people believing prior to creation? Not biblical but there are people that believe that false teaching.

We were elected to be In Union with Christ...IN HIM
You continue to get it backwards Z. We are only part of the elect when we are in Christ through faith.

Now you get it right, After the work of the Spirit, [In HIM]they heard and believed and were sealed.
How can you make such obvious mistakes Z? Having heard and believed we were sealed. What were you seal in Z?

yes, like the golden chain of rom.8;29-30, the same order of events....Whom He did Foreknow, He also did Predestinate
God foreknows who will freely trust in His son and those that have trusted in Him are predestined to be conformed to the image of His image. Not is not hard tom understand once you discard that odd teaching you hold to

you are looking at the text, backward to forward, adding words to twist or wrest the scripture to pervert it to say what you would like it to say, rather than what it does say, because you hate the truth that God has revealed in scripture.
Actually the word of God is clear Z if you will just trust it.
Rom 10:9 that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved;

Joh 20:31 but these have been written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name.

I am sure you will come to understand these truths once you allow the word of God to be the basis of your faith rather than the false teachings you find in calvinist philosophy.


That is a perversion, that your friend leighton , and others try to foist on the text.
The bible tells us that God saves those that believe the truth so why do you say that is not true?

In this perverted scenario, you want it to say that! The Church, or assembly, are individual living stones, that God has elected , and fashioned into His body or assembly.
The bible says we are saved by grace through faith why do you disagree with the word of God Z?
 

DaveXR650

Well-Known Member
I have given some thought to your reasoning here Dave and I think this post highlights what is wrong with Calvinism and why it should be rejected as the Christian faith.
First of all, I have no idea if my off hand opinion on Thomas has ever been discussed by any Calvinist theologian but I do know that it is not part of any Calvinist confession. That was me and I just was saying that the things shared in scripture as to how they reacted when initially confronted by Jesus as back from the dead are not really applicable to how a person gets saved. And I stick by the fact that if you look at the whole of the relationship between Jesus and his disciples and especially how he revealed himself to them rather than let them use their innate ability to figure out what has happened with the provided information - well, it all seems very deterministic to me.

Your ideas you shared show me a dedicated Bible student whom I respect and I am not going to try to refute what you said. I agree that there are quite a few differences between Reformed Baptists and regular Baptists regarding end times events and I honestly don't know how I feel about all that. I don't know if I buy into Calvinist end times explanations at all. My own church is pre tribulation rapture and a literal 1000 year reign of Christ that comes at a later time. Most Calvinists don't believe in a rapture and many don't believe in a millennial reign that is literal. Some believe all the prophesies regarding the end times are already past except for Christ's second coming. I don't honestly know if Dr. Flowers has any opinion on these matters.

My suggestion for everyone is what I said before. Theological systems are good guidelines but poor masters of your faith and practice. I can find logical holes in all these systems. Calvinism is vulnerable because so much is written down and people have almost 500 years to answer back. Most non-Calvinist theology is very difficult to find in a written form. Wesley is an example. I like him but he is all over the place. Most Baptists didn't even write anything. When a dispute comes up they split and separate and still do. I don't think there is an answer but I do find the animosity concerning on all sides.
 

Zaatar71

Well-Known Member
What game Z?


They became part of the elect when they were sealed.


You have it backwards Z. They hear the gospel and then they believe. You cannot believe in something you know nothing about.


When one believes and is sealed by the Holy Spirit they become part of the elect.


So you do not understand the word marked Z?


So you have people believing prior to creation? Not biblical but there are people that believe that false teaching.


You continue to get it backwards Z. We are only part of the elect when we are in Christ through faith.


How can you make such obvious mistakes Z? Having heard and believed we were sealed. What were you seal in Z?


God foreknows who will freely trust in His son and those that have trusted in Him are predestined to be conformed to the image of His image. Not is not hard tom understand once you discard that odd teaching you hold to


Actually the word of God is clear Z if you will just trust it.
Rom 10:9 that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved;

Joh 20:31 but these have been written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name.

I am sure you will come to understand these truths once you allow the word of God to be the basis of your faith rather than the false teachings you find in calvinist philosophy.



The bible tells us that God saves those that believe the truth so why do you say that is not true?


The bible says we are saved by grace through faith why do you disagree with the word of God Z?
Re- read the post, you are conflating two separate things.
1] Election before the world was created

2] Belief here in the world, after it was created
Big difference SH...let me know when you see it. Your whole post ignores this difference!

Election by God before the world was created, and belief bey sinners after the world is created, are two different things, at two different times.
 

Silverhair

Well-Known Member
Re- read the post, you are conflating two separate things.
1] Election before the world was created

2] Belief here in the world, after it was created
Big difference SH...let me know when you see it. Your whole post ignores this difference!

Election by God before the world was created, and belief bey sinners after the world is created, are two different things, at two different times.

Well since God did not elect anyone prior to creation that takes care of one of your errors.

The "Elect One" is Christ Jesus and we are only elect when we are in Him and that only happens when we believe in Him not before.

Let me know when you come to that biblical understanding Z.
 

Zaatar71

Well-Known Member
Well since God did not elect anyone prior to creation that takes care of one of your errors.

The "Elect One" is Christ Jesus and we are only elect when we are in Him and that only happens when we believe in Him not before.

Let me know when you come to that biblical understanding Z.
I will when God gives you eyesight..until then , you look to repeat error over and over. I cannot help that. You look but do not see.
 
Top