Wrong again. If Jesus was not risen we'd still be in our sine....we are saved by His life. I live so ye can live also....
So Jesus didn't have to die for the elect to be saved?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Wrong again. If Jesus was not risen we'd still be in our sine....we are saved by His life. I live so ye can live also....
I know I don't always agree with Willis, but he's right on this one. Paul even confirms as much in his letters to the church at Corinth.
That 17th verse tells us that it took the raising of Christ up from the dead. Without the resurrection, we would have no hope. As he wrote in verse 19, we would be most miserable.
No one would argue that point, Steaver. Of course there is no resurrection without death. The point Paul is making is that the death alone is not enough. If Christ had only died, then we would still be in our sins. Just as Israel was any time a sacrifice was made. Sure, atonement was made for a season, but since the sacrificed animal lacked the ability to pick its life back up, it was only a temporary atonement.Resurrection from whence? From life? If there is no death, there is no resurrection. You need both.
No one would argue that point, Steaver. Of course there is no resurrection without death. The point Paul is making is that the death alone is not enough. If Christ had only died, then we would still be in our sins. Just as Israel was any time a sacrifice was made. Sure, atonement was made for a season, but since the sacrificed animal lacked the ability to pick its life back up, it was only a temporary atonement.
Christ, though, made it clear that He was laying His life down, and that He had power to pick it back up. That's what sealed the deal for us, because it fully accomplished that which we could not accomplish. We could never raise ourselves from the dead. Christ could. So He did just that, exiting the tomb triumphant over Death, Hell, and the Grave. Now we no longer have to fear the physical death, because there is no permanency in it for those who believe. Instead, we have a hope of resurrection. Our faith is not vain, nor are we any longer in our sins, because the way has been fully made for us. Not solely through the death on the cross, but accomplished through the resurrection of Christ and His defeat of death on our behalf.
Amen! And my point remains valid. Both Christ's death and His resurrection is what saves. I never said it was just His death. Blessings!
I misread who Willis was responding to in Post 55. Apologies. Good discussion, though.
Amen! And my point remains valid. Both Christ's death and His resurrection is what saves. I never said it was just His death. Blessings!
Summed up in this one verse:So, we are saved by His life, His death, and His resurrection.
Blessings,
The Archangel
Summed up in this one verse:
Joh 1:29 The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.
You quote that verse but i cant see how you believe it or understand it ! That world of Jn 1:29 has no sins to be punished for, but many shall die in their sins and unbelief Jn 8:24
24 I said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins.
How can that be so, if He has taken away their sins as the Lamb of God ?
So Jn 1:29 is restricted to the world of believers, the Sheep !
I appreciate your thorough answer. I never made a relation between Christ's High Priestly Prayer and Christ's prayer on the cross. Protestant did. I was simply replying to his post. So I suppose it sounds like I was making a relationship, but it wasn't intended.
Thank you for your reply.
We aren't saved by His death, but His life. His death brought the atonement, but if He had not arisen, we'd still be in our sins...
I never said that was my opinion, that is you being a liar without a conscious , now address the comment i made with scripture!Then, in your opinion, John was just a plain old liar.
Sad!
So Jesus didn't have to die for the elect to be saved?
No one would argue that point, Steaver. Of course there is no resurrection without death. The point Paul is making is that the death alone is not enough. If Christ had only died, then we would still be in our sins. Just as Israel was any time a sacrifice was made. Sure, atonement was made for a season, but since the sacrificed animal lacked the ability to pick its life back up, it was only a temporary atonement.
Christ, though, made it clear that He was laying His life down, and that He had power to pick it back up. That's what sealed the deal for us, because it fully accomplished that which we could not accomplish. We could never raise ourselves from the dead. Christ could. So He did just that, exiting the tomb triumphant over Death, Hell, and the Grave. Now we no longer have to fear the physical death, because there is no permanency in it for those who believe. Instead, we have a hope of resurrection. Our faith is not vain, nor are we any longer in our sins, because the way has been fully made for us. Not solely through the death on the cross, but accomplished through the resurrection of Christ and His defeat of death on our behalf.
Except that Jesus stated that salvation was completed and finished when he died, and that the bible does teach us that we who have been saved were reconciled back to the father by and thru the cross of Christ, that his shed bllod was atonement in full right at that moment that he died!
Also agree with you that in His resurrection was the confirmation that salvation was really a done deal, as he rose again for our justification!
It was just an opinion. I made a point by quoting scripture. Ask any one in elementary school what the meaning of the verse is. They will tell you. Calvinist or not, any child will tell you the meaning of that verse. But you come along and redefine the words in order to make it fit into your theological box. It doesn't fit. You assign different meanings to such obvious words that even a child can understand the verse. Then you will accuse the child that he can't understand "spiritual truths". Correct?I never said that was my opinion, that is you being a liar without a conscious , now address the comment i made with scripture!
See how you excuse your sins by making such a accusations ? That is just cold blooded ! But anyway the world of Jn 1:29 has no sins charged to it, their sins were charged to the Lamb of God, and He took them away before Gods Law and Justice, and God will not impute their sins back to them 2 Cor 5 :19 ! But some men do have their sins charged to them John 8:24 ! So they can not be part of the world of Jn 1:29 !It was just an opinion. I made a point by quoting scripture. Ask any one in elementary school what the meaning of the verse is. They will tell you. Calvinist or not, any child will tell you the meaning of that verse. But you come along and redefine the words in order to make it fit into your theological box. It doesn't fit. You assign different meanings to such obvious words that even a child can understand the verse. Then you will accuse the child that he can't understand "spiritual truths". Correct?
The verse (John 1:29) means exactly what it says, and needs no redefining by you.
See how you excuse your sins by making such a accusations ? That is just cold blooded ! But anyway the world of Jn 1:29 has no sins charged to it, their sins were charged to the Lamb of God, and He took them away before Gods Law and Justice, and God will not impute their sins back to them 2 Cor 5 :19 ! But some men do have their sins charged to them John 8:24 ! So they can not be part of the world of Jn 1:29 !
Christ lived, died, was buried, rose from the dead, ascended into heaven, sits at the right hand of the throne of God, and NOW makes intercession for His saints. Not until His ascension did He assume the office of Intercessor.Christ’s intercession on behalf of those given Him by the Father is an integral aspect of His office as their High Priest.
It is this intercession which is elaborated in John 17 (pre-cross), Luke 23:34 (on the cross), and Romans 8:32-34 (post-cross):
No. Paul is writing to the church, that is the saints in Christ at Rome. Naturally he uses the personal pronoun of "we" and "us." Is he excluding the Ephesians and Philippians? Actually, he is. Only the Romans and Paul are included in the "we" and "us" in context here. He is not writing to the world, neither to all the elect. He is writing to the saints in Rome.32 He that spared..., who also maketh intercession for us.
Please note the correlation of ‘us’ in verse 32 with ‘elect’ in verse 33.
Then note the same correlation with ‘elect’ in verse 33 and ‘us’ in verse 34.
Simply put, Christ was crucified for us, the elect, and intercedes for us, the elect.
The elect at Rome. That is who he is writing to.Verse 32 also acknowledges that ‘all things’ necessary for justification of the elect are freely [i.e. graciously] given to the elect having been purchased for us by Christ.
--All in the world who believe on Him. John 3:16God the Father has given a people to His Son.
Unlike Paul's letter for the church at Rome, this is Jesus' Great High Priestly Prayer, and has nothing to do with an epistle written to Rome.As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him. (John 17:2)
The Father, in his omniscience, has given to Christ, all that believe on his name. He doesn't force anyone to come to Christ. The atonement isn't limited. Grace isn't resistible. Depravity isn't so depraved that man is unable to come to Christ. In His sovereign grace God Almighty has made a way that man can freely choose to come to Christ or not to come. But God in his omniscience already knows what decision man has already made. Therefore before the foundation of the world, he has "given" those to Christ.Please note that although Christ is Lord over all men, He has been authorized by the Father to give eternal life to only those [i.e. the elect] whom the Father gave Him.
He was praying for his disciples if you read the context.Christ’s atonement is limited to that specific group.
Perhaps, they chose God. And God knew that they would.Those given are called ‘God’s elect’ because it is the Father who chose them for salvation.
1 John 4:19 We love him, because he first loved us.God the Father chose them because He loved them:
Irrelevant conclusion. This is the Great High Priestly Prayer.……thou hast sent me, and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me. (verse 23b)
The Elect believe the doctrines of Christ, which are the doctrines of God the Father:
The Great High Priestly Prayer. He is praying for His disciples. He is about to go to the cross. He is telling the Father that he has accomplished the work that the Father gave Him.For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them… (verse 8a)
Jesus states emphatically that He DOES NOT pray for the world, but only for those Elect given Him by the Father.
I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine. (verse 9)
Christ prays not only for those Elect who have believed in Him in the past and present, He prays for those who will come to believe in Him in the future.
Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;
21 That they all may be one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us:
John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.(verses 20-21)
In order for future believers to be ‘one’ with God’s Elect, as well as ‘one’ in the Father and Son, they, too, must be the Elect chosen by the Father……for whom Christ died and gives the gift of eternal life.
The non-elect [i.e. ‘reprobate']are synonymous with the ‘world’…….haters of the Elect, God and Christ.
Sadly, many of them are of this world, but God hates it. (1John 2:15,16; James 4:4; Rom.12:1,2; 2Cor.6:14-17; Rom.16:17).The Elect are not the ‘world.’
I have given them [the Elect]thy word; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world.
You mean those that chose not to believe, as it says: "they were that believed not." Read what you post!Also please consider Christ always knew who are the reprobate: those not given Him by the Father.
But there are some of you that believe not. For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him.
Not if you believe what the Bible says.And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.
Therefore, it is impossible that Christ on the cross prayed for the world consisting of every one ever born.