• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why the mark of the beast will probably NOT be Hi-Tech

Sai

Well-Known Member
Both Pope Francis with his Pachamama and Joe Biden the devout Catholic have that qualification.

I remember reading Alexander Hislop’s The Two Babylons years ago. Great book. Very enhancing read. But the Catholic Church will be included into mystery Babylon the harlot a new age amalgamation of all humanity and religions. Kind of like the stupid mask virtue signaling that the masses have convinced themselves is piety


Blessings
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
Yes he will also not regard women’s rights at all. Whatever is going on today with the emasculation of men and glorification of women will not be the AC’s policy.


Blessings

Dan 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.

That's sexual desire on a man's part: i.e. he won't be weak vis-à-vis the temptations of women, possibly implying he will be a Sodomite, although that doesn't mean he won't have a female consort.
 

Sai

Well-Known Member
Dan 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.

That's sexual desire on a man's part: i.e. he won't be weak vis-à-vis the temptations of women, possibly implying he will be a Sodomite, although that doesn't mean he won't have a female consort.

That’s what I used to assume. But then after talking with Dr Arnold Fruchtenbaum he said that it means he will disregard women’s rights similar to Islamists.

I could see either as the trend toward transgendering is what we see.

However, in our country where men are reduced to fools and women are seen as deliverers, this is not the case in other parts of the world at all. I lean towards men who will join with Antichrist in support may have seen a total decimation of western societies because of women led legislation, see him as a no nonsense male. Another reason I can see this is because of Satan’s war against females since the protoevangellion in Genesis as played out in chapter six.

Nero, Caligula, these tyrants were put to death because of their sexual deprivation.
Yet men will follow the Antichrist.


Blessings
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
That’s what I used to assume. But then after talking with Dr Arnold Fruchtenbaum he said that it means he will disregard women’s rights similar to Islamists.

Cute, only the words of God are the desire of women, as in sexual desire, as in and desire shall fail (Ecc.12:5).

Dr. so-and-so is conforming to the image of the world. The antichrist is the main proponent of "women's rights" ever since Genesis 3.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Cute, only the words of God are the desire of women, as in sexual desire, as in and desire shall fail (Ecc.12:5).

Dr. so-and-so is conforming to the image of the world. The antichrist is the main proponent of "women's rights" ever since Genesis 3.

Canada is rapidly moving away from the West and Christian heritage. Maybe you should flee to Australia.... Or maybe move to small town Alberta.
 

SGO

Well-Known Member
There is neither Jew nor Greek,
there is neither bond nor free,
there is neither male nor female:
for ye all are one in Christ Jesus.
Galatians 3:28

Women's true rights in Christ.
 

Sai

Well-Known Member
Cute, only the words of God are the desire of women, as in sexual desire, as in and desire shall fail (Ecc.12:5).

Dr. so-and-so is conforming to the image of the world. The antichrist is the main proponent of "women's rights" ever since Genesis 3.

I hope you’re not counseling believers. Not just you, too many like yourself are approaching the word incorrectly


Blessings
 

George Antonios

Well-Known Member
I hope you’re not counseling believers. Not just you, too many like yourself are approaching the word incorrectly

Blessings

You and your doctor are framing the antichrist as being as an anti-feminist, and you're worried about my counsel?
Ok then.
 

Benjamin

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don’t get into these end time, anti-Christ discussions much at all, more than not the input of imagination usually sounds totally off base and wacked to me and I can only imagine what unbelievers must think of it, but I’ll say this, …that I believe many miss the meaning of the symbolism of “seduction” …especially if they see it as having anything to do with feminism.

Mar 13:22 For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.

One will either be waiting faithfully as the Bride of Christ upon His return or it will be evident that “adulterers” have been seduced by the anti-Christ.

Mar 13:17 But woe to them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days!

IMO…has nothing to do with gender.
 

Sai

Well-Known Member
You and your doctor are framing the antichrist as being as an anti-feminist, and you're worried about my counsel?
Ok then.

You don’t have to take it personally. You’re way under me in the gift of knowledge. This is obvious


Blessings
 

Sai

Well-Known Member
And don't forget your great gift of humility.

I believe that the posters here have not attained the level of learning that I have in my 50 years a believer.

That does not make me prideful. What it is is a declarative statement. It may be wrong but it is not as far as I have seen. All it means is that I respect that you believe and love the Lord but have no confidence in your ability to use the scriptures to work supernaturally into the needs of fellow believers. From my perspective it is your pride that keeps Adonai from revealing more light to you.


Blessings
 

RighteousnessTemperance&

Well-Known Member
DNA testing is not all that reliable. I do not know about "advanced" tests.
DNA testing for matching evidence, suspects, close relatives, is already quite accurate.

DNA testing to determine extended heritage or origins is a farce. Mankind has migrated and intermingled too much over the centuries for it to be more than generally approximate.
 
Top