First of all, it was Martin who was known as the "Bible Answer Man". Hangraaf just kept the name after he took control of CRI.
Second, that he was never charged with a crime does not mean that he did not sin.
By your logic, Ergun Caner did nothing wrong and should be welcome in any pulpit, in spite of the fact that he's never repented.
i am NOT defending him, just was asking what it proven that he did, as have not heard about this until mention on the Board!