• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Why? Why?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Greektim, post #26
You speak of Rom. 9:16 as if it is about salvation. If that is correct, can you interpret the rest of ch. 9? Do you switch to a different view (like Rom. 9 is about national election or some such)? I'm surprised to see a non-calvie use Rom. 9 in regards to salvation.

Van, post #27,
Yes, I have posted my view of the entirety of Romans chapter 9. If we look at Romans 9:16 we see that "it" does not depend on man. What is the it. If you look at the entire chapter, then God's choice to have mercy on some does not depend on the man that wills. And that mercy, is to save us, those He called from the Jews and Gentiles.

Greektim, post #59
As I asked before, but don't think I ever received an answer, Van, am I correct in understanding that you believe Rom. 9 to be about salvation?

Van, post # 72
No, you did not ask what I think Romans 9 is all about, you asked if I had presented my views on Romans 9, and I said yes.

By the numbers
1) Yes I believe Romans 9:16 God’s choice of individuals for salvation does not depend on their faith, but upon God’s mercy.
2) God’s choices can be conditional or unconditional, corporate or individual, including God’s conditional choice through faith in the truth for individual salvation.
3) As indicated in post 27, I believe Romans 9 is about God’s right to make choices such as for salvation, like the right of the Potter to make different pots from one lump of clay.
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Calvinists argue that God's gift of salvation is not made in the form of an "appeal" (like Paul does in 2 Cor. 5), but in an irresistible or effectual manner (often referred to as 'regeneration'). Acts 7:51, like the 2 Cor 5 passage show that God's provisions/appeals are often resisted or 'traded in for lies' but God still should be given full credit for giving them.

Besides the fact that Acts 7:51 is a conviction from the Holy Ghost of unregenerate Jews long history of resisting the Holy Ghost which culminated with them committing the ultimate act of resisting the Holy Ghost by murdering Christ, it has nothing to do with the Reformed precept of Irresistible Grace. Man can no more resist the birth from above any more than he can resist his physical birth. He is totally passive in both:

who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. Jn 1:13


To suggest that a man cannot believe the gospel because it wasn't able to be understood or didn't come with sufficient power to enable a response....

24 The Jews therefore came round about him, and said unto him, How long dost thou hold us in suspense? If thou art the Christ, tell us plainly.
25 Jesus answered them, I told you, and ye believe not: the works that I do in my Father`s name, these bear witness of me.
26 But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep. Jn 10

I can't imagine a more powerful presentation of the gospel than that given by Christ Himself, and yet these didn’t believe. Why? They didn’t belong to Him. They weren’t ‘born of God’.

Again:

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I came forth and am come from God; for neither have I come of myself, but he sent me.
43 Why do ye not understand my speech? Even because ye cannot hear my word.
44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father it is your will to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and standeth not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof.
45 But because I say the truth, ye believe me not. Jn 8

If one is not FIRST born of God, if God is not their father, they cannot love Christ, or understand His speech, or hear His word.

Paul reiterates the same here:

12 But we received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is from God; that we might know the things that were freely given to us of God.
14 Now the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him; and he cannot know them, because they are spiritually judged. 1 Cor 2

… only serves give the unbelievers an excuse for their unbelief and make God's means appear to be failing or falling short.

Sometimes, actually oftentimes, your reasoning totally escapes me. Well, that’s what it is though, your reasoning; it’s your complaint, certainly not Christ’s complaint:

He shall see of the travail of his soul, and shall be satisfied: by the knowledge of himself shall my righteous servant justify many; and he shall bear their iniquities. Isa 53:11

I believe God's gift, which are able to be traded in for lies and resisted, is more than sufficient to enable a response and God should get full credit for providing that gift for the world, not just a preselected few.

The children of the heavenly Zion cannot resist their birth from above.

….Calvinists argue that men are unable to submit to God's law and that this somehow proves they likewise are unable to believe apart from the irresistible work of regeneration….

The Calvinists are dead on spot here, unlike you they accept the clear teaching of Christ Himself:

.....If any one may not be born from above, he is not able to see the reign of God....If any one may not be born of water, and the Spirit, he is not able to enter into the reign of God.....It behoveth you to be born from above… he who is doing the truth doth come to the light, that his works may be manifested, that in God they are having been wrought; Jn 3:3,5,7,21 YLT

Before one can enter or even see the kingdom, or come to Christ (the two are synonymous in this discourse), one must FIRST be IRRESISTABLY born from above.

God has already wrought within those that come to Christ.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Calvinists argue that God's gift of salvation is not made in the form of an "appeal" (like Paul does in 2 Cor. 5), but in an irresistible or effectual manner (often referred to as 'regeneration'). Acts 7:51, like the 2 Cor 5 passage show that God's provisions/appeals are often resisted or 'traded in for lies' but God still should be given full credit for giving them. To suggest that a man cannot believe the gospel because it wasn't able to be understood or didn't come with sufficient power to enable a response only serves give the unbelievers an excuse for their unbelief and make God's means appear to be failing or falling short. I believe God's gift, which are able to be traded in for lies and resisted, is more than sufficient to enable a response and God should get full credit for providing that gift for the world, not just a preselected few.

I'd say, we are saved by Grace through faith...as faith doesn't merit or earn one's salvation. People who ask for forgiveness don't necessarily deserve it just because they asked for it. It is still an act of Grace to save the humble.

Calvinists argue that men are unable to submit to God's law and that this somehow proves they likewise are unable to believe apart from the irresistible work of regeneration. But proof that men can't earn or merit salvation by works is not equal to them being unable to believe and request Christ's forgiveness.

Aaron sums it up nicely:

"Ever and anon the noncalvinist cries, Why doth He yet find fault?"
 

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
...FTR, post #98 was 'tongue in cheek' on my part; was trying to provoke some dialog into the eternal realm, didn't work, never mind.

By no means do I actually think it 'cool' for anyone to burn in hell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top