Will Obama Declare Martial Law before Election? There are credible leaks....

[LadyEagle]

Will Obama Attempt To Declare Martial Law Before November Election?

Canada Free Press contributor Doug Hagmann has reported that a longtime friend and Department of Homeland Security official revealed to him “…the uppermost echelon of the DHS is actively preparing for massive social unrest inside the United States,” and not only “…expecting and preparing for it, they are actually facilitating it.”

According to Hagmann’s DHS source, the Obama Regime—which initiates Department agenda and dominates its thinking—will proceed by implementing “economic chaos, chaos through racial division and chaos through class division, all joined by Barack Hussein Obama and his stable of unelected czars.”

For three years, the Administration has worked to destroy the private sector and destabilize the value of the dollar. It has injected race and class into every argument, setting the stage for “summer riots” organized by Regime operatives. And when economic calamity and civil unrest are at their zenith, “…a false flag event against Obama or his family, something that will outrage ‘black America’ ” will be crafted, its purpose, to “…evoke the ugliest of reactions and create racial chaos in this country that will make the Watts riots, 1968 and the Rodney King riots pale in comparison.”

At this juncture, the federal government will be “forced” to take a hand for the well-being of the nation and the American public, of course. Martial law will be declared by an appropriately “reluctant” Barack Obama, who will offer a television persona clearly dis-inclined to the exercise of such staggering authority. Naturally, he will promise the duration of his absolute power to be brief and its use, strictly and fairly measured. The 2012 election will–for the purposes of fairness and equity—be indefinitely postponed.

Rest here: http://www.westernjournalism.com/will-obama-attempt-to-declare-martial-law-before-november-election/

According to my source, it is the very existence of our country and way of life is at stake. Many people who are currently in positions of power, whether elected or appointed, have the same ideological goals of Barack Hussein Obama. Like Obama, they want to transform the country, and will use every tactic possible to do so. They believe that under Obama, they finally have the perfect opportunity to implement the socialism-to-communism agenda in America. They hate, and I mean hate the democratic system of government and loathe capitalism. They are the "red diaper babies" of the 1960's who have gained power through the very process they seek to destroy.

They feel that they have lived their entire lives for this time in history, when they can change America on every level. They feel that they need more time, however, to fully achieve their objectives. My source told me that something(s) went "sideways" for Obama, which created the need for more time, or a second term.

According to my source, there were some internal problems within the Department of Homeland Security, and some external problems outside of that venue as well that slowed the process. My source stated that the delays caused a lot of anger among those at a higher level, and that anger or impatience trickled down through the ranks at DHS.

On the day of the shooting at the Sikh Temple, however, my source stated that there were many meetings and contacts between Obama's people, especially from Valerie Jarrett, that involved Janet Napolitano and the FBI director. According to my source, Jarrett and others within Obama's inner circle were actually coordinating how the information about the shooting was to be handled. Imagine that! Obama's closest advisor was actually involved with almost every aspect of a local shooting by first designating it as an act of domestic terrorism. As soon as they were made aware that the shooting took place at a Sikh Temple and had the identity of the shooter, they made sure that the federal agents took over the crime scene so the flow of information could be controlled. "There was a sickening sense of perverted excitement by Obama's closest advisors, based on what I heard at my level," said my source. "That twist approach to a terrible event, it actually p-ssed some [higher ranking DHS officials] off," he said to me. He also said that he heard one high ranking source within DHS tell someone else that "we can't let this one get away from us," a reference to the shooting.

So, they obviously prefer to exploit situations like the shooting in Wisconsin to attack our freedoms granted under the Constitution, but have no moral objection to creating their own crises, if necessary, to further their objectives. In part, that's where the "false-flag" scenario originated.

My source was very emphatic then and now that the planning that is being done is "fluid," or always being revised and updated to exploit whatever situations might arise.

Rest, including credentials of this interview here:
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/zieve/120807

 

[InTheLight]

Once again the old canard about the President canceling the upcoming election is making the rounds again. The first time I heard of this was in 1996 when Bill Clinton was going to 'cancel' the election. Then it was repeated in 2000 with some twist where Clinton would resign, Gore would become President and then Gore would nominate Hillary to be the VP. Then it came up again in 2004, but this time Bush was going suspend the election. Same thing in 2008. Now we have it happening again.

The election will be held as usual.

During the economic downturn of 2008 it was said that Bush would suspend the elections. Food prices were going to go through the roof. The dollar was going to crash. There would be hyper-inflation. Oil prices would spike and the "globalists" would not allow the Bakken oil field in North Dakota to be drilled. There would be rioting in the streets with jack-booted government soldiers rounding up protestors. (I bet if I were to search BB's archives I could find all of this speculation.) None of it came true. This stuff keeps making the rounds like a bad forwarded email.

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

Though I shouldn't be, I am amazed at the silliness and drivel like that spouted out by the authors of the articles quoted in the OP. Are they never embarrassed by their foolishness and stupidity?

There is not a snowball's chance in an Alabama August that President Obama would even consider such a ludicrous idea.

Even IF he were to think about this in a moment of absent mindedness even he would know what a wacky notion it would be.

For a leader to pull this off he has to be popular - the president is not.
For a leader to pull this off he has to have leadership skills - the president does not.
For a leader to pull this off he needs military (or similar) backing - the president does not.
For a leader to pull this off he needs a strong personality - the president does not.

Rest at ease folks - this notion will go the way of oath taking on the Koran in the last election and marital law to cancel the mid-terms.

I know I am not as smart as many here - but I can tell you with absolute assurance that you don't have to worry about martial law being declared before the election.

The nut jobs quoted in the OP know it as well. The are self-deluded with their 'my source' tells me this and that and they remind of my grandchildren trying to get attention.

 

[Crabtownboy]

Whoa! Talk about sleaze. Is there no depth of silliness that Obama haters will not stoop to?

 

[Arbo]

Whoa! Talk about sleaze. Is there no depth of silliness that Obama haters will not stoop to?

Righteous indignation can really be ironic at times.

 

[Magnetic Poles]

Whoa! Talk about sleaze. Is there no depth of silliness that Obama haters will not stoop to?

The answer is "No". Delusional post at best. They live in a world of paranoia and fear. The election will be held as scheduled.

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

The answer is "No". Delusional post at best. They live in a world of paranoia and fear. The election will be held as scheduled.

Let's be fair. The author of the OP merely posited a question for discussion based on a couple of articles. We need to be sure that we address the articles without questioning the motivation of the author of the OP.

The people who wrote the linked articles are simply delusional, paranoid, fearmongeriing, tin foil hat wearing, conspiracy theorising, logic lacking nut cases who have lost all touch with reality. The question they pose is foolish at best.

 

[mandym]

Whoa! Talk about sleaze. Is there no depth of silliness that Obama haters will not stoop to?

While I do not agree with the op it fails in comparison to the constant sleaze you engage in.

 

[preachinjesus]

As predicted this time 4 years ago...this board has descended into oblivion by their constant (and unfounded) attacks on the current administration.

I don't know how anyone could take the quoted people in the OP seriously. Of course we have a guy at our church who wants to hold seminars on emergency preparedness when the country goes belly up and our society ends. He's convinced this will happen. We try to keep him away from microphones.

 

[Aaron]

Rest here: http://www.westernjournalism.com/will-obama-attempt-to-declare-martial-law-before-november-election/




Rest, including credentials of this interview here:
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/zieve/120807

We know this. If he thinks he can make it work, he will. He was born in Kenya, yet his scruples haven't stopped him from illegally usurping the office of President.

 

[InTheLight]

Of course we have a guy at our church who wants to hold seminars on emergency preparedness when the country goes belly up and our society ends. He's convinced this will happen. We try to keep him away from microphones.

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?t=30993

--

 

[OldRegular]

Might bring folks out of their stupor!

 

[freeatlast]

People specualte about everything. The problem here is this is more then specualtion. This is an attempt to slander.

 

[billwald]

WE heard the same rumors about Bush during the last Bush administration. Why would the international corporations want to upset their apple cart?

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

No further discussion on this fascinating topic?

 

[Magnetic Poles]

Let's be fair. The author of the OP merely posited a question for discussion based on a couple of articles. We need to be sure that we address the articles without questioning the motivation of the author of the OP.

While I agree, it is also a fact that some things are just so fringe and looney that people only spread them to foment distrust and get others to buy into their pet conspiracy theories.

 

[just-want-peace]

While I agree, it is also a fact that some things are just so fringe and looney that people only spread them to foment distrust and get others to buy into their pet conspiracy theories.

You mean along the line of Romney being responsible for that woman's death from cancer?????:sleep:

Yep, I agree with your statement!:thumbs:

 

[LadyEagle]

While I agree, it is also a fact that some things are just so fringe and looney that people only spread them to foment distrust and get others to buy into their pet conspiracy theories.

Whoever on the BB would that be?

I post, you decide. We will wait and see if these people writing about these things are loony tunes. But in the event of a Martial Law, the Internet as a form of communication will be suspended.

Perhaps some of you should enlighten yourselves as to what Martial Law entails and the many Executive Orders concerning this, not only by obama, but other presidents, as well.

I find it rather sad that no matter how much regulatory power obama gives away to his czars, no matter how many times he circumvents Congress, no matter how many times his administration disregards the rule of law and invades our privacy, there is nary a peep out of his defenders. If this were written about a Romney, you would be all over it and spreading the "rumor" no doubt.

Point: Too much power in the hands of ANY man, be he Republican or Democrat, obama or a GW Bush, was never intended to be given to the Executive Branch by our Constitution and the Founding Fathers.

Our government has and continues to fail us, we the people.

So, just for purposes of discussion surrounding the Martial Law issue, is there any scenario you can envision that would justify a declaration of Martial Law?

Civil unrest in the streets? We've had civil unrest in the streets before, but no martial law.

Is it or is it not true that this president has fomented division among the American people? I say, it is true. Just look at the wild posts, personal attacks, etc. on this board alone.

 

[InTheLight]

Perhaps some of you should enlighten yourselves as to what Martial Law entails and the many Executive Orders concerning this, not only by obama, but other presidents, as well.

Good idea.

First of all, martial law is the calling out of the military to replace civilian law enforcement. Please explain how the military is going to prevent an election from happening?

Secondly, Obama cannot simply issue an executive order to postpone national elections.

Thirdly, even if he were to attempt it, I'm certain the Supreme Court would immediately rule that it was illegal.

In the article you linked to, the supposition was that Obama's czars would foment riots, based on race, in major cities in the U.S. This would cause martial law to be invoked and because of the resulting widespread chaos, Obama would 'cancel' the election.

Really?

Please post a detailed scenario as to how you see Obama canceling the elections. Once you start to think it through I believe you will come to the conclusion that he can't do it.

 

[InTheLight]

So, just for purposes of discussion surrounding the Martial Law issue, is there any scenario you can envision that would justify a declaration of Martial Law?

A natural disaster over widespread area that rendered local law enforcement ineffective. Earthquake or hurricane. I believe martial law was put in place after hurricane Katrina. Typically, though, each state would call out the National Guard in these incidences. Natural disasters can't be scheduled so I don't think we'll be seeing this happening the last week of October, just prior to the election.

An attack by another country could also do it. I don't think Obama and his czars can pull that off in late October.

Civil unrest in the streets? We've had civil unrest in the streets before, but no martial law.

Yes, but this is the scenario presented in the OP. Keep in mind that martial law does not mean that the constitution has been suspended, that the Bill of Rights is no longer in force, it means that military forces are responsible for law enforcement.

Is it or is it not true that this president has fomented division among the American people?

Yes, but it's subtle, and mostly along the wealthy vs. poor or middle class. Otherwise some of the division that Obama has 'created' has been mostly right wing-nuts stirring up the pot with inaccurate and slanderous emails about Obama that make the rounds.