Magnetic Poles
New Member
Oh, touched another nerve I see! :thumbs:Curtis, don't be surprised. MP loves to throw around the "r" word.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Oh, touched another nerve I see! :thumbs:Curtis, don't be surprised. MP loves to throw around the "r" word.
The US keeps the problem with Mexico going by supplying customers for expensive Mexican pot. Legalize the stuff and the Mexican border problem will go away. Pot is the #1 cash crop in BC, Washington, Oregon, and Humbolt County, Cal. If it was legal the price would be lower than tobacco and that is why it never will be legal.
If the war with Japan was not racist then why were German and Irish NAZIs in the US not locked up as decent Japanese AMERICAN citizens were?
Restitution or not, the locking up of Japanese citizens was not justified. Now back to the op.If I am not mistaken, I believe that restitution was paid to the victims (Japanese Americans) of what took place during WW2. This happened during Ronald Reagan's time in office.
The reason that they were locked up was because Japan attacked us. We had no way of knowing who the enemy was. Kind of like what happened with 9-11, except, those involved had been in our country for at least two years.
If the war with Japan was not racist then why were German and Irish NAZIs in the US not locked up as decent Japanese AMERICAN citizens were?
They were. Some camps were here in Texas. Just last Friday in the local paper was an article about one womens grandparents who were locked up for a bit, then released. will try to find a link.
If the war with Japan was not racist then why were German and Irish NAZIs in the US not locked up as decent Japanese AMERICAN citizens were?
No, go back and reread. I said the OP was race baiting and xenophobic. AND it had nothing to do with you until you threw yourself into it, so since you took offense, I told you if the shoe fits...in other words, if it applies to you, then feel free to take offense. If not, move along.
National security is an important issue. Borders should be monitored. Any nation has the right to control access. But it appears that often, racial prejudice and xenophobic fear are covered under a blanket of "seal the border". My former congressman, the disgraceful Tom Tancredo, made this his cause celebre.
Curious. You are a bag of contradictions. You claim to know my wants and beliefs, yet assert correctly that I don't know yours. That is true, but neither do you know what I believe.MP is just showing his liberal colors. Anytime one disagrees with another who happens to not be of the Caucasian race, he wants to accuse them of race baiting. He and others on this board will attempt to steer legitimate criticism down the nearest rabbit trail. Sadly, they succeed too often. Let him call me a racist if he chooses, I will not reply in kind. He doesn't know my heart nor my beliefs. I too believe the borders should be CLOSED and illegals should be be DEPORTED even if they are Hispanic, Chinese, African, Caucasian or any other race.
I am not concerned, nor did I mention the race of any of those coming over our borders and attacking American citizens. I am solely CONCERNED about the safety of American citizens, and what I see as a very destabilizing situation taking place, down Mexico way!
Should these cartels start firing mortars and rockets over the border into the USA, will that change your view of my legitimate concerns?
I see much larger problems coming out of these border skirmishes, just wait and see!
Pastor Paul:type:
Magnetic Poles said:You also seek to use the label "liberal" as an epithet. I am proud to be a liberal in some issues, and conservative in others. Yet, your ilk views the world in binary terms, and see those with differing opinions as a monolith rather than individuals with widely ranging views on many issues.
from here:
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=1392773#post1392773
Tee Hee, 'binary' -- you sure use some strange terms there MP
Oh, same as 'binary' in math: 1 or 0, black or white, crimson or creme, yes or no, on or off.
How to spot a liberal on the Baptist Board:
1. They liberally use epithet terms (usually without any idea of what it means)
2. ...
Of course, 'liberal' here as I use it means 'generous'.
And here is the logic of prejudice:
The bait and switch logical error:
One note a feature of some set to be used as an epithet.
One notes a person has that attribute.
One says that epithet applies to each subject of the epithet set with all the attributes.
One tosses out a binary epithet.
Example:
One note a feature of some set to be used as an epithet.
LIBERALS ACCEPT MORE ALIENS
One notes a person has that attribute.
ED HAS THE ATTRIBUTE: ACCEPT MORE ALIENS
One says that epithet applies to to all subjects of the epithet set with all the attributes.
LIBERALS WEAR YELLOW TIES
One tosses out a binary epithet.
ED IS A YELLOW TIE WEARING LIBERAL
I am liberal with my money. I gave 134,000$ out of my first Million to the Alameda Baptist Church of Norman, Oklahoma. (That is 13.4% for you folks quick to compute numbers). Of course, 'liberal' here as I use it means 'generous'. (BTW, the lord blessed me with my Million dollars in only 24 years :godisgood: )
BTW, I don't own a yellow tie. Being the chief bouncer* in my Church I wear 'fall-off' ties and short hair. But come to think of it, a yellow tie might look good with my greenish-gray suit ...