To a normal Christian those listed above are heretical. Of course they are not true Bible translations. Why even bring up that nonsense?
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Will you Supprt Inclusive Language 2020 Nasb?
- Thread starter Yeshua1
- Start date
There are no translations that validate his claims, except maybe some ultra weird KJQ Bible. Aside from that kind of 'translation' which no one reads, you cannot point to any Bible translation that does what you claim. Again, you have been making a career of making absolutely false claims for 15 years with zero documentation. You need to produce quotes from the text, otherwise you are just bloviating.He is now allowed to get away way it due to some translations giving weight toi what he states!
The above demonstrates that nothing he quotes has anything to do with his reply.This is the big danger when one uses a functional over a formal translation!
You just cannot admit that there are areas where the Niv 2011 made it worse in the revision, can you?The above demonstrates that nothing he quotes has anything to do with his reply.
You can not validate your lies with any text of the NIV. Fictional things from your wretched imagination do not count. The only thing that matters is what the text says. Making stupid assertions is your stock-in-trade. Try to be honest, it will be a first.You just cannot admit that there are areas where the Niv 2011 made it worse in the revision, can you?
So it is then to you a perfect english translation, same way KJVO views their version?You can not validate your lies with any text of the NIV. Fictional things from your wretched imagination do not count. The only thing that matters is what the text says. Making stupid assertions is your stock-in-trade. Try to be honest, it will be a first.
Point to any place in which I have said or implied anything of the kind. If you can't do that, don't make things up. Your immaturity is showing.So it is then to you a perfect english translation, same way KJVO views their version?
Any time MM or myself make a valid point on how the Niv 2011 mistranslated, you fall back to same we are wrong, period!Point to any place in which I have said or implied anything of the kind. If you can't do that, don't make things up. Your immaturity is showing.
None of your fabrications are in the text of the NIV. If it's not in the text --it is made up.Any time MM or myself make a valid point on how the Niv 2011 mistranslated, you fall back to same we are wrong, period!
So both of us are liars, or gossips?None of your fabrications are in the text of the NIV. If it's not in the text --it is made up.
Repetition is a basic didactic principle.None of your fabrications are in the text of the NIV. If it's not in the text --it is made up.