William and Myself

[rsr]

Isn't it time someone put this thread out of its misery?

 

[Mexdeaf]

All I can say is- 1 Corinthians 14:36-38.

 

[Ed Edwards]

AMen, Brother Mexdef -- you said it right!!

 

[EdSutton]

Originally posted by william s. correa:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by EdSutton:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Did you know, the King James Bible is the only English Bible in the world that has a command to "study" your Bible? That's right - 2 Timothy 2:15, "STUDY to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth" - has been changed in every English Bible on the face of this earth! BUT ONE.

I certainly was not aware of this. Let's see.

2 Timothy 2:15 (Amplified Bible)

15 Study and be eager and do your utmost to present yourself to God approved (tested by trial), a workman who has no cause to be ashamed, correctly analyzing and accurately dividing [rightly handling and skillfully teaching] the Word of Truth. (II Tim. 2:15 - AMP) Amplified Bible (AMP)- Copyright © 1954, 1958, 1962, 1964, 1965, 1987 by The Lockman Foundation
AMP at Lockman The Lockman Foundation Amplified at Zondervan Zondervan

2 Timothy 2:15 (21st Century King James Version)
15 Study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman who needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. (II Tim. 2: 15) - KJ21 - 21st Century King James Version (KJ21)
Copyright © 1994 by Deuel Enterprises, Inc.
KJ21 at Deuel

Study to show yourself approved unto God, a workman that needs not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. (II Tim. 2:15) - The King James 2000 Version © Copyright © 2000 by Dr. Robert A. Couric

Copyright © 1962-1998
By Jay P. Green, Sr.
15 Study earnestly to present yourself approved to God, a workman that does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the Word of Truth. (II Tim. 2:15 - MKJV)

Actually, I guess I am still not aware of this.

I normally do not post in a requested private dialogue in this forum, but could not let this falsehood go unchallenged. And FTR, as to the quote from the KJV that one used, even though the KJV is in the 'public domain' in the US, (although still not in the UK), Zondervan has the copyright to the site and the version of the Bible that they publish, which you pasted.

In His grace,
Ed </font>[/QUOTE]Amen Brother Zondervan also has been Known to publish The satanic bible; we are to be separate from this world but yet you cant tell the new church apart from the world give me the first cetury churche's integrity any day!

</font>[/QUOTE]Once again, a falsehood. And I am calling you on it. Zondervan has not been known to publish "The satanic bible"(sic). Your statement is false. But why let facts get in the way of a good 'lie'? And since you made the statement, without referencing it, I assume you are teaching this, or at least proclaiming it as fact. It is simply not true. And I can back this up, if necessary. Can you? I didn't think so.

You are the one that has spoken of integrity, not me. So, in addition to not acknowledging a false statement as to English versions, that I pointed out, and you chose to ignore, no doubt in the interest of integrity, since that 'integrity' might call into question someone's motives for the 'KJVO' argument being advanced, -

Let's try a couple or three more of your statements on for size. BTW, these are statements you made, not copied from another, for a change.

We dont(sic) have a problem because we stick to tradition!

Puts one in good company, along with the Scribes and Pharisees, no doubt. KJV support on request!

I personally beleive you will hear what you want to.

And you are Exhibit "A", perhaps?

But if these so called Assumtions are false I still dislike all MV's,and will never read any thing other than a KJB.

This is a true statement, no doubt, and is entirely your decision and privilege.

Tahnx for reminding me that I'm nothing

Take it by faith, brother!

In His grace,
Ed

[ April 19, 2006, 01:44 AM: Message edited by: EdSutton ]

 

[DesiderioDomini]

If William's next post does not begin to answer the questions posed to him, then I will let his words stand, and be done with it.

He has proven beyond any doubt to be quite possibly the most indoctrinated person I have met in these discussions. He still has not addressed ONE ISSUE.

 

[EdSutton]

Originally posted by DesiderioDomini:
If William's next post does not begin to answer the questions posed to him, then I will let his words stand, and be done with it.

He has proven beyond any doubt to be quite possibly the most indoctrinated person I have met in these discussions. He still has not addressed ONE ISSUE.

Uh- personal opinion and suggestion. Don't hold your breath!
Ed

 

[EdSutton]

Originally posted by Mexdeaf:
All I can say is- 1 Corinthians 14:36-38.

And from the KJV!

Ed

 

[robycop3]

Mr. Correa:What is a Robycop3 any way?Souds like another Bible of the month member!

I am a ferrer who rejects your KJVO myth due to lack of Scriptural support.


I guess Spouting anti KJB slogans so he can promote HIS version! sounds like your typing with your mouth full"Jesus' legal earthly father since he was married to His mother when Jesus was born."
you make me sick!

Then please don't barf in my yard.

My "slogan" was against the purveyor of bunk who started that stupid statement about Luke 2;43. Like it or lump it.


You have missed the boat by a coutry mile bud! Get it right or go back to sleep!

I am wide awake. I suggest you consult a rabbi about Jewish law and a good encyclopedia about Roman law. In both sets of law, a man is considered the father of any chile born to his wife during their marriage. Don't like it? Complain to the Jews & the Romans.

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

I realise we are not on page five, but I have seen enough.