• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

World explodes over dead lion, ignores planned parenthood

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I wonder about the extent that the influence of the Lion King cartoon plays in this with the younger generation here in the States.

Ed to add: That sentence seems awkward, but I am at a loss as to how to make it sound better. One of those ESL moments, I guess.

Let's compare the death of a lion to the an improperly parked vehicle Rolf. Stop minimizing dead lions by deflecting the story with improperly parked news vehicles. The dead lion is the story here and you are trivializing it. You are only allowed to care about one thing at a time. From here on out every story ever must be weighed against planned parenthood for publication. That is the new measuring stick.

:smilewinkgrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Alcott

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I sure feel sorry for all the zebras, impalas, or yaks that now won't have the honor of dying in Cecil's jaws & claws, it will have to settle for an ordinary lion, or cheetah, or
crocodile.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Following are some stories about the disposal of slaughtered unborn children. {Reference: http://clinicquotes.com/category/articles/what-to-do-with-the-bodies/} I have taken the liberty of expanding one of the stories. {Reference:http://clinicquotes.com/the-street-of-dead-babies/}

Pro-lifers pull aborted babies from dumpster
Posted on January 21, 2015 by Sarah
From Carole Novielli, Saynsmthn’s blog We knew the abortion clinics could be throwing the aborted babies in the trash. So, how would we know which clinics were disposing the babies illegally? There was no way to know- we’d have to … Continue reading →

Share on Facebook
Posted in Unborn Babies Found in Trash | 1 Comment
Video: Womans Choice Abortion Clinic Investigation
Posted on October 27, 2014 by Sarah
In this video, Citizens for Pro-Life society show you what was thrown in the dumpsters at two abortion clinics in Michigan. I’m sure that going through the dumpster was something the pro-lifers hated doing. I’m sure they felt dreadful gathering up … Continue reading →

Share on Facebook
Posted in Body Disposal | Leave a comment
Woman aborts baby at home; Police describe “sad little face”
Posted on October 20, 2014 by Sarah
An article in The New Republic described how Jennie Linn McCormack aborted her late term unborn baby with pills she purchased online. She did not want to pay for an abortion in a clinic, which cost about $400 to $2,000, (depending on … Continue reading →

Share on Facebook
Posted in Body Disposal, Miscellaneous Quotes, Quotes | Leave a comment
“bag of baby parts”
Posted on May 24, 2014 by Sarah
In 1992, the remains of aborted babies were discovered. Instead of incinerating the bodies or sending them to apathology lab, the abortion clinic merely dumped them. The babies ranged in age, some of them up to 5 months old. From … Continue reading →

Share on Facebook
Posted in Body Disposal | Leave a comment
On collecting “fetal tissue”
Posted on May 12, 2014 by Sarah
One article discussed the H. Ronald Zielke Brain and Tissue Bank for Developmental Disorders, hosted by the University of Maryland School of Medicine. It contains fetal tissue. “According to the bank’s 234-page “Catalog of Available Tissue,” updated July 1, it also … Continue reading →

Share on Facebook
Posted in Articles, The Selling of Baby Body Parts | Leave a comment
Pathologists describe dissecting the bodies of aborted babies
Posted on March 30, 2014 by Sarah
In an article entitled “What Happens to Unborn Babies After Abortion? Pathologists Share the Horrors” in LifeNews, writer Jonathon Van Maren reveals a horrible conversations that took place on a forum board for pathologists. Pathologists deal with the remains of surgeries, … Continue reading →

Share on Facebook
Posted in Body Disposal | 2 Comments
Abortionist Kept Dead Babies in Storage Unit
Posted on February 27, 2014 by Sarah
Joseph Booker Jr., abortionist, kept bags of aborted babies as souvenirs in a storage unit. LifeNews tells the story: “In December 1999, three dozen bags of aborted fetuses and other remains were found buried in a shallow grave behind a … Continue reading →

Share on Facebook
Posted in Body Disposal | Leave a comment
The street of dead fetuses
Posted on February 19, 2014 by Sarah
The street of dead fetuses
Posted on February 19, 2014 by Sarah
Richard Selzer tells the following story:

“In our city, garbage is collected early in the morning. Sometimes the bang of the cans and the grind of the truck awaken us before our time. We are resentful, mutter into our pillows, then go back to sleep. On the morning of August 6, 1975, the people of 73rd St. near Woodside Avenue do just that. When at last they rise from their beds, dress, eat breakfast, and leave their houses for work, they have forgotten, if they had ever known, that the garbage truck had passed earlier that morning. The event has slipped into unmemory, like a dream.

They close their doors and descend to the pavement. It is mid-summer. You measure the climate, decide how you feel in relation to the heat and humidity. You walk toward the bus stop. Others, your neighbors, are waiting there. It is all so familiar. All at once you step on something soft. You feel it with your foot. Even through your shoe you have the sense of something unusual, something marked by a special “give.” It is a foreignness upon the pavement. Instinct pulls your foot away in an awkward little movement. You look down and you see… a tiny naked body, its arms and legs flung apart, its head thrown back, its mouth agape, its face serious. A bird, you think, fallen from its nest. But there is no nest here on 73rd St., no bird so big. It is rubber, then. A model, a… joke.. Yes, that’s it, a joke. And so you bend to see. Because you must. And it’s no joke. Such a gray softness can be but one thing. It is a baby, and dead. You cover your mouth, your eyes. You are fixed. Horror has found its chink and crawled in, and you will never be the same as you were. Years later you will step from a sidewalk to a lawn, and you will start at it softness, and think of that upon which you have just trod.

Now you look about; another man has seen it too. “My God,” he whispers. Others come, people you have seen every day for years, and you hear them speak with strangely altered voices. “Look,” they say, “it’s a baby.” There is a cry. “Here’s another!” and “Another!” and “Another!” And you follow with your gaze the index fingers of your friends pointing from the huddle where you cluster. Yes, it is true! There are more of these… little carcasses upon the street. And for a moment you look up to see if all the unbaptized sinless are falling from limbo.

Now the street is filling with people. There are police. They know what to do. They rope off the area, then stand guard over the enclosed space. They are controlled, methodical, these young policeman. Servants, they do not reveal themselves to the public master; it would not be seemly. Yet I do see the pallor and the sweat that breaks upon the face of one, the way another bites the lining of his cheek and holds it thus. Ambulance attendants scoop up the bodies. They scan the street; none must be overlooked. What they place upon the litter amounts to little more than a dozen pounds of human flesh. They raise the litter, and slide it home inside the ambulance, and they drive away. You and your neighbor stand about in the street which is become for you a battlefield from which the newly slain have at last been bagged and tagged and dragged away. But what shrapnel is this? By what explosion flung, these fragments, that sink into the brain and fester there? Whatever smell there is in this place becomes for you the stench of death. The people of 73rd St. do not then speak to each other. It is too soon for outrage, too late for blindness. It is the time of a unresisted horror. {Reference: http://clinicquotes.com/the-street-of-dead-babies/}


Share on Facebook
Posted in Body Disposal | Leave a comment
Aborted babies burned with dead animals
Posted on November 16, 2013 by Sarah
“Pro-abortionists do not want the remains of aborted babies (especially late-term aborted babies) to fall into the hands of pro-life activists who then can reveal the bloody reality of abortion to the world. In Wichita, Kansas, and other cities, pro-lifers … Continue reading →

Share on Facebook
Posted in Body Disposal | 1 Comment
On slicing open babies for their organs: They are “just garbage”
Posted on November 16, 2013 by Sarah
A certain Dr. Kekomaki would take late-term aborted babies and, while they were still alive, would slice them open and ransack their organs without even giving them an anesthetic. A nurse observed one case and said that “They took the … Continue reading →

Reference: http://clinicquotes.com/category/articles/what-to-do-with-the-bodies/

And people get excited about a dead animal!
 

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mugawbe eats elephant and lion, maybe he could pack up Cecil's remains for dinner tomorrow night.


I wonder about the extent that the influence of the Lion King cartoon plays in this with the younger generation here in the States.

Ed to add: That sentence seems awkward, but I am at a loss as to how to make it sound better. One of those ESL moments, I guess.

Any ESL issues aside, I think you got something here - Simba, Scar, cartoon lions with human emotions and voices. OTOH, mills like PP go out of their way to make you think the unborn is just a blob of cells and tissue, a "fetus". Cecil even had a human's name.
 

Rolfe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Let's compare the death of a lion to the an improperly parked vehicle Rolf. Stop minimizing dead lions by deflecting the story with improperly parked news vehicles. The dead lion is the story here and you are trivializing it. You are only allowed to care about one thing at a time. From here on out every story ever must be weighed against plant parenthood for publication. That is the new measuring stick.

:smilewinkgrin:

Admittedly, I hope that your smiley guy indicates satire. Otherwise, I am not sure how to respond. It has been a very long day, and I fear that I could not post an intelligent rebuttal. I need to go to bed. :laugh:
 

Use of Time

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Admittedly, I hope that your smiley guy indicates satire. Otherwise, I am not sure how to respond. It has been a very long day, and I fear that I could not post an intelligent rebuttal. I need to go to bed. :laugh:

Yes, pure sarcasm my friend. Hang in there buddy.:thumbsup:
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Mugawbe eats elephant and lion, maybe he could pack up Cecil's remains for dinner tomorrow night.

Perspective

But most people in Zimbabwe don’t care about the dead lion, as they have much greater problems to deal with, such as an 80 percent unemployment rate, insane monetary inflation and a hugely corrupt government.

“Are you saying that all this noise is about a dead lion? Lions are killed all the time in this country,” said Tryphina Kaseke, a used-clothes hawker on the streets of Harare. “What is so special about this one?”

The truth is, most locals in Zimbabwe actually look forward to the big game hunts that Westerners engage in, as the high price tag for the hunts means money pumped into the local economy, not to mention the meat from such hunts is required by law to be given to local tribes and villages.

“Why are the Americans more concerned than us?” said Joseph Mabuwa, a 33-year-old father of two. “We never hear them speak out when villagers are killed by lions and elephants in Hwange.”
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
He had to know the outfitters were basically "chumming" the lion to get him to leave the wildlife sanctuary. Plus, the dentist has been busted twice before for hunting and fishing violations. I've never hunted lion, but is it considered legal or even good hunting etiquette to leave the pelt and head in the middle of the jungle?

One more point. If I told you that leaving bait for a lion is immoral I would have to tell you fishing with a worm or any other type of bait is also immoral.
 

wpe3bql

Member
You are blaming the victim here. It's shameful. Please give some examples of how a woman "puts herself in a position to be raped"?

Bro. ITL,

I'm not "blaming the victim," but here's an example of how a legally responsible woman "put herself in a position to be raped" that occurred only about a year or so right here in Nashville:

This 19-YO woman attended a party with some men with which she had little familiarity. She was distracted when a first-team college football player (I'll call him "Mr. Jock") entered the room and began talking to her.

The woman didn't know how popular the man was on campus, but she did know that he was very popular with the college athletic staff.

She was on an athletic scholarship for the college's womens' basketball team. Her court performance was marginal, but with some additional coaching, she could probably improve her game at least to the point of her not being dropped from the team and thus losing her scholarship.

Maybe this "Mr. Jock" could pull some strings for her if she became good friends with him. She edged up closer to him and began loosening up with him, far more than she knew she should, but, she figured, "What the heck, if 'Mr. Jock' can help me stay on the team--and thus here at this prestigious school--It'll be worth it to me."

While this was happening, one of "Mr. Jock's" friends slipped a powerful concoction of date rape drugs in her drink. After about 10 mins. she was almost totally unconscious.

"Mr. Jock's" friends took the 19-YO woman to his private room in the campus' Athletic Dorm." Minutes later "Mr. Jock," along with 2-3 of his friends--one with a video camera to film the "event"--showed up in his room and begun raping the nearly comatose woman.

After he had his way with her, & viewed the video of his conquest, the men decided it'd be best to take the victim back to her own dorm to cover the crime they committed.

They drove her back across the darkened campus, & dumped her still unconscious body in the hallway next to her locked room.

It wasn't til dawn when 1 of her dormmates noticed her almost lifeless body right by her room's door.

The woman's friend called the campus 911 numbers.

The campus police & medical unit rushed her to the campus medical center. [This campus has a world-renowned teaching/research medical center.]

Some hours later, she regained consciousness.

Based on what she was able to recall, the campus police arrested the 4 men who committed the crime.

Each man is being separately tried for their cruel act. "Mr. Jock's" first-rate defense team have managed to delay his trial for months based on technicalities. That's the latest the local media is telling us.

Speculation is that "Mr. Jock" may not be tried for another 4-5 months, and a "change of venue" may delay his trial for several more months.

So, a woman who's legally classified as an adult, & from a background from which she "should have known better" was raped at a prestigious college right here in Nashville.

Was she totally to blame for allowing this rape from which she probably will never fully recover? No, not totally. There were several accomplices that should be tried and imprisoned to the fullest extent of the law.

Will their imprisonments help this young woman completely recover from the trauma she had to experience from this cruel act?

Probably not, especially after she'll be called to court to testify at least 4, maybe more, times against these 4 criminals over the next couple years.

This is an "example of how a legally-responsible woman allowed herself to be put into a position that caused her to be raped."

Tragic?

Of course it is, but it happened right here in Nashville, TN's capital city, whose exec. & legis. branches are controlled by conservative--basically pro-life people.

Many of them actively supported last year's overwhelmingly popular, strongly pro-life referendum which was approved by a huge landslide vote to establish an Amendment 2 to our state constitution.

This amendment establishes a very strict set of criteria for any abortion clinic that wishes to operate within the Volunteer State's borders.

Our state constitution now calls for any abortion clinic to be supervised by a state-licensed physician who is trained and board-certified in pediatric surgery. He not only must be in personal attendance for "the procedure," but also have hospital admitting rights at the nearest hospital to the "clinic," in case "something goes wrong that can't be dealt with at his 'clinic.'"

Moreover, the "clinic" must maintain hospital-approved (and inspected) standards of sanitization of every sq. in. of the "clinic's medical operating area."

All medical personnel must be kept current and certified with all relevant medical surgical practices and procedures before they can "operate" on the fetus.

Most abortion clinics here in TN can't afford the higher operating costs it takes to conform to the new state rules. They've protested to the TN State Supreme Court, but with no success. TN's Supreme Court is technically non-partisan, but so far they've told the "clinics" that Amendment 2 is LAW!

You abortion "providers had your chance last Nov. (and, believe me, PP & other "pro-choice" groups throughout the US pumped several million $$$ last year to defeat the Amend. 2 referendum!), and you LOST!"

The "abortion providers" were told by the court to either come up to the new state standards, or find some other state that'll let you "operate"!

At least for now, TN's pro-life movement is strong, but eventually this amendment will be reviewed by the SCOTUS. No telling what the SCOTUS will tell TN.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
One more point. If I told you that leaving bait for a lion is immoral I would have to tell you fishing with a worm or any other type of bait is also immoral.

Well, they didn't leave bait for the lion. They mounted a dead animal on a vehicle then drove that vehicle near the lion so that he started following the vehicle. They led the lion out of the game preserve so it could be "legally" killed.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Maybe this "Mr. Jock" could pull some strings for her if she became good friends with him. She edged up closer to him and began loosening up with him, far more than she knew she should, but, she figured, "What the heck, if 'Mr. Jock' can help me stay on the team--and thus here at this prestigious school--It'll be worth it to me."

How do you know this is what she was thinking? How do you know she was "loosening up with him"? And even if she was that doesn't mean she would have ended up having s#x with him.

While this was happening, one of "Mr. Jock's" friends slipped a powerful concoction of date rape drugs in her drink. After about 10 mins. she was almost totally unconscious.

Yes, she was totally asking for it. :tonofbricks:

She may have been flirting with Mr. Jock but in no way does that mean she deserved to be drugged and raped.
 

wpe3bql

Member
How do you know this is what she was thinking? How do you know she was "loosening up with him"? And even if she was that doesn't mean she would have ended up having s#x with him.



Yes, she was totally asking for it. :tonofbricks:

My information came from the woman's own later admissions that she herself (accompanied by her lawyer) and were subsequently aired by one of the local TV stations...I think it might have been the local NBC affiliate, but since it was over a year ago, it could have been either the local CBS or ABC affiliate. My memory at my age sometimes fails me.

She was in a nearly-unconscious state at the time of the rape, but since she was of legally-responsible age (19) seems to me that her priorities got misplaced.

She wasn't a 13- or 14-YO child who'd never been out with boys at a non-school sanctioned function where something stronger than iced tea was offered.

She knew what she was about to do before she did it. Maybe she didn't know exactly what the tragic outcome would be, but she knew there was a potential of something like this happening.

If she was intelligent enough to secure a scholarship from a highly-selective college as she did, one would think that she would have enough sense to be careful about selecting who her close friends ought to be.

Yes, it's tragic....I'm sure that if she were given the option to do again what she did that night, she'd probably not chose to do what she did do that night....At least I'd hope she wouldn't.

My point is this: She was old enough to know better, but she chose to cast caution to the wind. She knew better, but thought she could get away without being harmed.

She wasn't a "little girl who needed to have her mommy or daddy hold her hand to cross the street to get to that drinking party."

At some point we have to draw the line and say, "You're a big girl now....You're old enough to make you own decisions....Mommy and Daddy will be here to help you to some extent, but ultimately the choice is yours."

It was her own choice....It wasn't a good choice by any means, but it was her choice to go to that drinking party. It was her choice to allow herself to be put in a very compromising situation. Since she made that choice--against her own better judgment--who should we ultimately blame for the tragic outcome?

Do we blame the people who owned the place where the drinking party occurred? Do we blame the company that made the drink she took that night? Do we blame the college for allowing her to attend that party? Do we blame college housing, or its athletic staff for having a football team on which "Mr. Jock" played or a woman's basketball team on which she played? Is that college housing to blame for having an athletic dorm in which the rape took place?

That'd be stupid to blame any of the above, wouldn't it?

So, who then was responsible for her actions?

Maybe it should be Nashville. After all if Nashville didn't exist, maybe that college wouldn't be here.

That's a really good scapegoat, isn't it?

Or maybe it's ME? I live in Nashville. I pay taxes to allow the store from which that video camera and its equipment was purchased to exist, to allow the streets on which the college campus stands. Yeah, it's me whose responsible for her being raped, isn't it?

OTOH, maybe we can blame the Nashville Electric Service who supplies electricity to both the college campus and the building where the drinking party took place....After all if that building where the party took place had no electricity, maybe that party wouldn't have taken place....so yeah, it's NES's' fault.

Yes, ITL, there's a whole lot of guilty people we could blame....Are you willing to take all of us (including me, don't forget) to court and pay all the court costs when it throws all of us out because of your frivolous law suits? Well, are you?

Didn't think so.

I didn't have to speculate what she was thinking. She herself publicly admitted on TV what she was thinking. She publicly admitted that she was loosening up to "Mr. Jock." She publicly admitted to the fact that she could ultimately could have been raped.

So don't go putting words in my mouth....Words you KNOW I've NEVER spoken!

If I weren't a Christian, I could just as easy sue you for public defamation of character, my friend.

Fortunately, I consider you to be my brother in Christ, and in my book (namely I Cor. 6), brothers ought not to sue each other in court.

I'm willing to let bygones be bygones and bury the hatchet over the way you've publicly disrespected me.

I've got better things to do than fret over your unfounded misrepresentations of me here on BB.

I'm willing to put away "childish things" (I Cor. 13:11). Are you? If so, then let's be friends and call off these childish accusations which you KNOW have no basis in fact.

Okay?
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Bro. ITL,

I'm not "blaming the victim," but here's an example of how a legally responsible woman "put herself in a position to be raped" that occurred only about a year or so right here in Nashville:

This 19-YO woman attended a party with some men with which she had little familiarity. She was distracted when a first-team college football player (I'll call him "Mr. Jock") entered the room and began talking to her.

The woman didn't know how popular the man was on campus, but she did know that he was very popular with the college athletic staff.

She was on an athletic scholarship for the college's womens' basketball team. Her court performance was marginal, but with some additional coaching, she could probably improve her game at least to the point of her not being dropped from the team and thus losing her scholarship.

Maybe this "Mr. Jock" could pull some strings for her if she became good friends with him. She edged up closer to him and began loosening up with him, far more than she knew she should, but, she figured, "What the heck, if 'Mr. Jock' can help me stay on the team--and thus here at this prestigious school--It'll be worth it to me."

While this was happening, one of "Mr. Jock's" friends slipped a powerful concoction of date rape drugs in her drink. After about 10 mins. she was almost totally unconscious.

"Mr. Jock's" friends took the 19-YO woman to his private room in the campus' Athletic Dorm." Minutes later "Mr. Jock," along with 2-3 of his friends--one with a video camera to film the "event"--showed up in his room and begun raping the nearly comatose woman.

After he had his way with her, & viewed the video of his conquest, the men decided it'd be best to take the victim back to her own dorm to cover the crime they committed.

They drove her back across the darkened campus, & dumped her still unconscious body in the hallway next to her locked room.

It wasn't til dawn when 1 of her dormmates noticed her almost lifeless body right by her room's door.

The woman's friend called the campus 911 numbers.

The campus police & medical unit rushed her to the campus medical center. [This campus has a world-renowned teaching/research medical center.]

Some hours later, she regained consciousness.

Based on what she was able to recall, the campus police arrested the 4 men who committed the crime.

Each man is being separately tried for their cruel act. "Mr. Jock's" first-rate defense team have managed to delay his trial for months based on technicalities. That's the latest the local media is telling us.

Speculation is that "Mr. Jock" may not be tried for another 4-5 months, and a "change of venue" may delay his trial for several more months.

So, a woman who's legally classified as an adult, & from a background from which she "should have known better" was raped at a prestigious college right here in Nashville.

Was she totally to blame for allowing this rape from which she probably will never fully recover? No, not totally. There were several accomplices that should be tried and imprisoned to the fullest extent of the law.

Will their imprisonments help this young woman completely recover from the trauma she had to experience from this cruel act?

Probably not, especially after she'll be called to court to testify at least 4, maybe more, times against these 4 criminals over the next couple years.

This is an "example of how a legally-responsible woman allowed herself to be put into a position that caused her to be raped."

Tragic?

Of course it is, but it happened right here in Nashville, TN's capital city, whose exec. & legis. branches are controlled by conservative--basically pro-life people.

Many of them actively supported last year's overwhelmingly popular, strongly pro-life referendum which was approved by a huge landslide vote to establish an Amendment 2 to our state constitution.

This amendment establishes a very strict set of criteria for any abortion clinic that wishes to operate within the Volunteer State's borders.

Our state constitution now calls for any abortion clinic to be supervised by a state-licensed physician who is trained and board-certified in pediatric surgery. He not only must be in personal attendance for "the procedure," but also have hospital admitting rights at the nearest hospital to the "clinic," in case "something goes wrong that can't be dealt with at his 'clinic.'"

Moreover, the "clinic" must maintain hospital-approved (and inspected) standards of sanitization of every sq. in. of the "clinic's medical operating area."

All medical personnel must be kept current and certified with all relevant medical surgical practices and procedures before they can "operate" on the fetus.

Most abortion clinics here in TN can't afford the higher operating costs it takes to conform to the new state rules. They've protested to the TN State Supreme Court, but with no success. TN's Supreme Court is technically non-partisan, but so far they've told the "clinics" that Amendment 2 is LAW!

You abortion "providers had your chance last Nov. (and, believe me, PP & other "pro-choice" groups throughout the US pumped several million $$$ last year to defeat the Amend. 2 referendum!), and you LOST!"

The "abortion providers" were told by the court to either come up to the new state standards, or find some other state that'll let you "operate"!

At least for now, TN's pro-life movement is strong, but eventually this amendment will be reviewed by the SCOTUS. No telling what the SCOTUS will tell TN.

I am curious? What does the gang rape of an unconscious woman have to do with the pro-life movement in Tennessee or the conservative--basically pro-life people in Nashville?
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Well, they didn't leave bait for the lion. They mounted a dead animal on a vehicle then drove that vehicle near the lion so that he started following the vehicle. They led the lion out of the game preserve so it could be "legally" killed.

Are there laws written to prohibit this ?
 

wpe3bql

Member
I'm merely pointing out that a rape (gang rape or otherwise) can happen anywhere, even within a society that basically is one that would disapprove of abortion on demand.

Isn't the comparison between what happened to a dead lion and PP's continuous genocide of the unborn the reason for the OP?

And, having said all that I have, I am no longer going to post any more on this thread. I've already said all that I'm going to say about this thread's OP. I'm too busy to waste any more of my time defending my right to post what I've posted to anyone who comes out of the clear blue sky and demands that I answer every one of their silly demands.

Like it or not, you've read all that I'm going to post on this thread. If it were up to me, I'd say it's high time this thread be closed and locked.

Are you listening BB administrators/moderators?
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
ITL, I'm not sure we'll get this back on topic after the rape thing, but I appreciate your answers. This seems like more the responsibility of the outfitters. Anyway, I'll bow out and the let topic go off course.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm too busy to waste any more of my time defending my right to post what I've posted to anyone who comes out of the clear blue sky and demands that I answer every one of their silly demands.

This is a debate forum. People are going to want to see some proof of the claims that are made here. It's the nature of the board.

I had no idea this woman had publicly admitted to anything. I don't know why you took offense at my asking you "how do you know that?" but I sure am shaking my head at why my question lit the blue touch paper and prompted you to type:

Yeah, it's me whose responsible for her being raped, isn't it?

If I offended you, I'm sorry. I didn't intend to.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
ITL, I'm not sure we'll get this back on topic after the rape thing, but I appreciate your answers. This seems like more the responsibility of the outfitters. Anyway, I'll bow out and the let topic go off course.

Yes, it is the outfitters that actually broke the law, but it's likely the dentist was in on the idea and approved of it.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
The leader of the Center for Medical Progress, the organisation exposing Planned Parenthood, told CNN “New Day” this morning that a biomedical company is trying to silence CMP because they are “very scared” of footage coming out that will prove babies were born alive before being “aborted” and having tissue and organs harvested.

California based StemExpress, a company closely allied with Planned Parenthood that provides fetal tissue to researchers, has managed to convince a Superior Court judge to issue a temporary restraining order against CMP.

The order bars the undercover journalists from releasing any more footage of StemExpress officials.

David Daleiden explained why he believes StemExpress is taking such hefty action:

Continue . . . http://www.infowars.com/cmp-head-company-trying-to-block-video-that-could-prove-aborted-babies-were-born-alive-then-harvested/
 
Top