Normally, I'd place this in the Homeschool section; but I wanted to ensure that lots of people who don't normally visit that section see it.
This is a horrible proposal. It's extremely sad that the child died; but homeschooling wasn't a cause, and all other homeschoolers are now suspects.
Let's make sure we understand the facts:
Multiple interventions; calls to social services and police; teachers initiated complaints to the county; and we think that requiring people to get approval to homeschool is somehow going to solve this problem?
Make sure you understand the logic, people: The government authorities knew the children were being abused, and were in danger of death; but they did nothing.
Make sure you understand the logic, people: This same government that did nothing to prevent the death of this child after multiple notifications, now thinks that by keeping the child in the system that did nothing for him, he might still be alive.
I agree; it's possible that he might still be alive, and still being abused.
I can't wrap my head around it. Maybe y'all can explain it to me in another way that somehow makes sense.
http://watchdog.org/121479/ohio-homeschooling-law/
An Ohio senator wants the state to investigate parents who decide to homeschool their children.
This comes after the death of a Theodore “Teddy” Foltz-Tedesco, who was brought to Akron Children’s Hospital Mahoning Valley with head trauma Jan. 21. His injuries, the result of a beating, were so severe he was immediately transferred to St. Elizabeth Health Center. Teddy died in the hospital Jan. 26. He was 14.
Teddy’s murder led state Sen. Capri Cafaro, D-Hubbard, to introduce a bill that would “require a public children services agency to recommend whether a child should be admitted to an internet or computer-based community school or excused by a school district superintendent from attendance at school for home education.”
This is a horrible proposal. It's extremely sad that the child died; but homeschooling wasn't a cause, and all other homeschoolers are now suspects.
Let's make sure we understand the facts:
Teddy’s mother, Shain Widdersheim, was sentenced to 15 years in prison for child endangerment and obstructing justice. Zaryl Bush, her boyfriend at the time, was sentenced to life in prison for Teddy’s murder and for child endangerment, intimidation of witnesses and tampering with evidence.
According to various news reports, Bush tortured and abused Teddy and his 10-year-old twin brothers.
Teddy’s grandmother tried to intervene. Friends and neighbors contacted social services. Police were told and Teddy’s teachers noticed and initiated a complaint with the county children services agency.
Widdersheim responding by taking Teddy out of the public school.
Multiple interventions; calls to social services and police; teachers initiated complaints to the county; and we think that requiring people to get approval to homeschool is somehow going to solve this problem?
Make sure you understand the logic, people: The government authorities knew the children were being abused, and were in danger of death; but they did nothing.
Make sure you understand the logic, people: This same government that did nothing to prevent the death of this child after multiple notifications, now thinks that by keeping the child in the system that did nothing for him, he might still be alive.
I agree; it's possible that he might still be alive, and still being abused.
I can't wrap my head around it. Maybe y'all can explain it to me in another way that somehow makes sense.