Would this be a KJ- Only?

[Salty]

I found this statement on a IFB church website:
"We believe that the bible is the verbally inspired and infallible, authoritative Word of God and that God gave the words of Scripture by inspiration without error in the original autographs. God promises that He will preserve His Words. Jesus said, “but my words shall not pass away” Matthew 24:35. We believe God kept that promise by preserving His infallible Word in the traditional Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and that the Authorized Version (KJV) is an accurate English translation of the preserved Word of God."

Would you consider this statement to be
as a King James Only church?

There home page states:

We are an Independent, Fundamental, Pre-Millennial, KJV Baptist Church.
Preaching The Gospel As It Is To Men As They Are. Romans 8:35-39

 

[37818]

Would you consider this statement to be
as a King James Only church?

Unfortunately, yes. Exodus 12:40 KJV is known to have this reading wrong.

 

[Salty]

But it stated "an accurate English translation" as opposed to "perfect translation"

It also states: "without error in the original autographs."

 

[Van]

I found this statement on a IFB church website:
"We believe that the bible is the verbally inspired and infallible, authoritative Word of God and that God gave the words of Scripture by inspiration without error in the original autographs. God promises that He will preserve His Words. Jesus said, “but my words shall not pass away” Matthew 24:35. We believe God kept that promise by preserving His infallible Word in the traditional Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and that the Authorized Version (KJV) is an accurate English translation of the preserved Word of God."

Would you consider this statement to be
as a King James Only church?

There home page states:

We are an Independent, Fundamental, Pre-Millennial, KJV Baptist Church.
Preaching The Gospel As It Is To Men As They Are. Romans 8:35-39

Nope.

There is nothing wrong to consider the KJV an accurate translation of the preserved Word of God. Their statement does not define what the "traditional Hebrew and Greek (never mind the Aramaic) manuscripts are. They could mean something not quite right, but I will give them the benefit of the doubt.

The test question is, Do they believe the KJV translation is inerrant?

 

[Jerome]

Salty - that sounds an awful lot like Pensacola's Articles of Faith!

 

[Salty]

Salty - that sounds an awful lot like Pensacola's Articles of Faith!

May of the HS teachers of their church school are grads of PCC

 

[Will J. Kinney]

Unfortunately, yes. Exodus 12:40 KJV is known to have this reading wrong.

No sir, the KJB and the traditional Hebrew texts is right. It is the fake "bibles" that nobody believes are inerrant that are wrong.

Here is why the KJB is right.

Exodus 12:40. Is the Hebrew text in error as well as most Bible versions as some claim?



http://brandplucked.com/exodus1240.htm



It turns out that it is the KJB that is right and versions like the ESV, NASB, NIV, NET, MEV, Legacy Standard and Holman Standard are the ones that are wrong. Here is why -

Exodus 12:40 - 430 years? Is the Hebrew text and the King James Bible wrong as some affirm?



How long were the children of Israel sojourning in Egypt? - 400 years, 430 years or 215 years? Genesis 15:13; Exodus 12:40-42; Acts 7:6 and Galatians 3:17.

 

[37818]

No sir, the KJB and the traditional Hebrew texts is right. It is the fake "bibles" that nobody believes are inerrant that are wrong.

Here is why the KJB is right.

Exodus 12:40. Is the Hebrew text in error as well as most Bible versions as some claim?



http://brandplucked.com/exodus1240.htm



It turns out that it is the KJB that is right and versions like the ESV, NASB, NIV, NET, MEV, Legacy Standard and Holman Standard are the ones that are wrong. Here is why -

Exodus 12:40 - 430 years? Is the Hebrew text and the King James Bible wrong as some affirm?



How long were the children of Israel sojourning in Egypt? - 400 years, 430 years or 215 years? Genesis 15:13; Exodus 12:40-42; Acts 7:6 and Galatians 3:17.

The 430 years is from Abraham Genesis,12 to the giving of the Law to Moses.

Galatians 3:16-17, Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

 

[Charlie24]

I found this statement on a IFB church website:
"We believe that the bible is the verbally inspired and infallible, authoritative Word of God and that God gave the words of Scripture by inspiration without error in the original autographs. God promises that He will preserve His Words. Jesus said, “but my words shall not pass away” Matthew 24:35. We believe God kept that promise by preserving His infallible Word in the traditional Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and that the Authorized Version (KJV) is an accurate English translation of the preserved Word of God."

Would you consider this statement to be
as a King James Only church?

There home page states:

We are an Independent, Fundamental, Pre-Millennial, KJV Baptist Church.
Preaching The Gospel As It Is To Men As They Are. Romans 8:35-39

Yes, they definitely are. It's not like they check you at the door and send you away it you don't have a KJV Bible.

You can take any version of the Bible you like in these Churches.

But you will hear preaching, memory verses taught to kids, Sunday School lessons, etc, from the KJV.

 

[Logos1560]

I found this statement on a IFB church website:
"We believe that the bible is the verbally inspired and infallible, authoritative Word of God and that God gave the words of Scripture by inspiration without error in the original autographs. God promises that He will preserve His Words. Jesus said, “but my words shall not pass away” Matthew 24:35. We believe God kept that promise by preserving His infallible Word in the traditional Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and that the Authorized Version (KJV) is an accurate English translation of the preserved Word of God."

Would you consider this statement to be
as a King James Only church?

It depends upon what they mean by accurate. If this church is making an exclusive only claim that the KJV provides an accurate English translation of every original-language word of Scripture, it would be KJV-only. Some may seem to use the word "accurate" to mean practically the same thing as perfect or inerrant. If they would claim that no other English Bible translation can be accurate in the same sense as they claim accurate for the KJV, it would suggest that they are KJV-only.

If they mean that the KJV is an accurate overall English Bible translation or accurate in a general overall sense, it would not be KJV-only.


D. A. Waite stated: “I am one of the Christians who contend that only the King James Bible gives us the Words of God in English” (Fundamental Deception, p. 33). Waite maintained that the KJV "is the only acceptable translation from the preserved Hebrew and Greek texts" and "is the only true Bible in the English language" (Fuzzy Facts, pp. 8-9). Waite asserted that the KJV “is the only accurate translation” or “the only accurate, faithful, and true translation” (Critical Answer to James Price’s, pp. 5, 41, 131). Waite wrote: “The King James Bible, because of its accurate translation of those Words [Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek], can honestly and truly be called God’s Words kept intact in English” (p. 109). Waite asserted: "I do not say that the King James Bible is 'fallible' or 'errant.' I don't believe that there are any translation errors in the King James Bible” (Fuzzy Facts, p. 44). Waite declared: “I have said many times before, and I believe, that there are no ‘translational errors’ In the King James Bible” (Critical Answer to Michael Sproul’s, p. 42). Waite wrote: “I have never said I believe in ‘an inerrant KJV.’ That is pure Ruckmanism” (p. 65). When Waite himself directly and clearly contended that the KJV “is ’God’s Word kept intact’” and that “intact” means “not touched” and “nothing harms or defiles it,” he would seem to be in effect or in practice trying to claim or at least imply perfection for the translating in the KJV (Defending the KJB, p. 1). Waite asserted: “The KING JAMES BIBLE is the Word of God in English, and the other versions are not” (p. 52).


KJV defender Glenn Conjurske observed: “Most of the King James Only men have of late been shy of the word ‘perfect,’ but if they ascribe to the King James Version what practically amounts to perfection, their scruples about the word ‘perfect’ signify nothing” (p. 127).

 

[Will J. Kinney]

The 430 years is from Abraham Genesis,12 to the giving of the Law to Moses.

Galatians 3:16-17, Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

Here is a helpful hint. Try to actually read the article before you make further comments. I discuss all these verses in the article and I also show several well known Bible commentators who agree with the KJB reading.

Exodus 12:40. Is the Hebrew text in error as well as most Bible versions as some claim?


http://brandplucked.com/exodus1240.htm


It turns out that it is the KJB that is right and versions like the ESV, NASB, NIV, NET, MEV, Legacy Standard and Holman Standard are the ones that are wrong. Here is why -

Exodus 12:40 - 430 years? Is the Hebrew text and the King James Bible wrong as some affirm?

God bless.

 

[Ben1445]

I found this statement on a IFB church website:
"We believe that the bible is the verbally inspired and infallible, authoritative Word of God and that God gave the words of Scripture by inspiration without error in the original autographs. God promises that He will preserve His Words. Jesus said, “but my words shall not pass away” Matthew 24:35. We believe God kept that promise by preserving His infallible Word in the traditional Hebrew and Greek manuscripts and that the Authorized Version (KJV) is an accurate English translation of the preserved Word of God."

Would you consider this statement to be
as a King James Only church?

There home page states:

We are an Independent, Fundamental, Pre-Millennial, KJV Baptist Church.
Preaching The Gospel As It Is To Men As They Are. Romans 8:35-39

I wouldn’t assume it.

 

[Deacon]

You're really pushing your Brandplucked website, Will.
Has the volume of visitors dropped off?

Rob

 

[37818]

Here is a helpful hint. Try to actually read the article before you make further comments. I discuss all these verses in the article and I also show several well known Bible commentators who agree with the KJB reading.

Exodus 12:40. Is the Hebrew text in error as well as most Bible versions as some claim?


http://brandplucked.com/exodus1240.htm


It turns out that it is the KJB that is right and versions like the ESV, NASB, NIV, NET, MEV, Legacy Standard and Holman Standard are the ones that are wrong. Here is why -

Exodus 12:40 - 430 years? Is the Hebrew text and the King James Bible wrong as some affirm?

God bless.

Please fact check this video at this link:
Post #20:

The "D" Chart

 

[Martin Marprelate]

Would you consider this statement to be
as a King James Only church?

No. Leave them alone.