An interesting concept is the "elevation" of tradition over truth.
We can usually agree that the inspired word, as written in the original autographs was inerrant. And we usually agree that our translations from the original languages copies, are made by people, and thus could include human errors.
Anyone who claims an existent translation, such as any of the versions of the KJB are inerrant, seems to be practicing "elevation."
My view, reflecting what I was taught, is that all translations introduce errors from their original language sources. And those original language sources also include errors introduced by the copyists, some inadvertent, some in a mistaken effort to fix a perceived problem.
The bible student's best solution to minimizing mistaken understandings based on accepting errant presentations in our translations, is to compare several and when differences occur, to engage in a deeper study, including grammar and word or phrase possible alternate meanings.
Even with that, we no doubt, hold some views that are wrong, as we see through a glass darkly.