You nailed it. It's left to the elders, the office holders, the deacons, the authority figures.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes. Happens all the time.xdisciplex said:Um.... so I guess the question is can a woman be an elder?
Bro. James Reed said:As far as an ordination is concerned, no.
The presbytery is to lay hands on the man. A presbytery is composed of ordained men; the elders/bishops.
This is for the specific purpose of making it known to the public and God that you, as an ordained elder, believe this one has been called by God to the same office.
Outside of that particular instance, say if I was sick in the hospital or having personal problems, I don't think I would have a problem with one of the old sisters laying a hand on me for comfort and asking God to bless me.
There is, in my opinion, a difference in the way we conduct business in a formal worship service, using absolutely specified, in scripture, rules and practices, and the way we comfort one another outside of a formal worship service.
Remember the 'sick thing' is in a church setting as well.Marcia said:I agree with you on the ordination. I am wondering about the sick thing, though.
Since the book of James (5.14) says to ask the elders of the church anoint the sick with oil, does this mean it's okay for women to do it, since elders are men?
Also, James talks about anointing with oil but I don't think the NT outside the gospels and Acts has a passage anywhere instructing the laying on of hands for healing of the sick (aside from using hands to put the oil on). Am I right?
They were not preachers, nor did they EVER CLAIMED TO BE PREACHERS.atestring said:I would not have a problem with a woman laying hands on me. I have no problem with women elders.
I have no problem with women preachers. Anyone that has ever given to a Lottie Moon or
annie Armstrong offering believes in women preachers.
Allan said:Remember the 'sick thing' is in a church setting as well.
Just to be sick and not let or allow any believer to pray for you is sillyness as Paul commands to pray for one another and also to pray for all things.
However the 'sick' in James (according to the text) strongly suggests not so much physical sickness (though it can be also) but spiritually sick as it makes reference to sins being forgiven.
In this situation it would be better to allow (as says the scripture) the 'righteous man' (one known or should be known to be in a right standing with God) to know you faults and pray for them.
xdisciplex said:Um.... so I guess the question is can a woman be an elder?
namely, if any man is above reproach, the husband of one wife, having children who believe, not accused of dissipation or rebellion.
For the overseer must be above reproach as God's steward, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, not fond of sordid gain,
but hospitable, loving what is good, sensible, just, devout, self-controlled,
holding fast the faithful word which is in accordance with the teaching, so that he will be able both to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict.
With regard to this, yes - as it specifically says call for the Elders...Marcia said:I didn't say not let women pray for you. I was talking about laying on of hands for healing not being instructed in the NT except for elders putting on oil. In other words, there is no instruction about laying hands on someone to heal them that I know of.
Okay, so you're saying the James passage makes it clear that only elders (men) should do this.
Can you document your arument?Allan said:They were not preachers, nor did they EVER CLAIMED TO BE PREACHERS.
Using Southern Baptist missionaries, I assume you might be or have been at one time and therefore your serious lack of understanding and uneducated response concering them as being preachers is quite ridiculous and absurd.
They were teachers outside of any church setting. They would do a bible study AND NEVER A Church service. When those within the study wanted to be such they would send for an ORDAINED MAN to come and take the study and form a church.
Church is NOT a bible study NOR is it where two or three believers are gathered. The scriptual view of the Church (local body of believers) is more than just the New Age view of a couple of people being together, as the Church as a designated head or Pastor, it has structure just to name some.
xdisciplex said:I read that this is not biblical and this means that nobody should allow a woman to lay hands on him. What do you think about this? Does the bible not mentioning a woman laying hands on somebody necessarily mean that it*s not okay?