No, I wasn't saying you did. I just said don't be like the others on this forum that fall into that trap.No one is twisting scripture who quotes it directly-- which is what I did-- and all what I did-- in the post you contested.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No, I wasn't saying you did. I just said don't be like the others on this forum that fall into that trap.No one is twisting scripture who quotes it directly-- which is what I did-- and all what I did-- in the post you contested.
Yes, there are still prophecies to be fulfilled but there are NO new prophecies being given so there are no prophets to listen to. They'er all dead.There is more yet to be fulfilled.
Actually:Yes, there are still prophecies to be fulfilled but there are NO new prophecies being give so there are no prophets to listen to. They'er all dead.
There are Baptists who argue the Tribulation started when Yeshua ascended to heaven. Oddly, the person I know also argues for a literal 24 hour creation day.So you think we are in the middle of the Tribulation? How droll!
Never said that. Just showing that prophets are still coming. What will their message be? Same as the others...So you think we are in the middle of the Tribulation? How droll!
Never said that. Just showing that prophets are still coming. What will their message be? Same as the others...
Those verses don't say the prophets are ended. A prophet is one who speaks forth the word of Elohim.When ever anyone bring up this subject I point them to two scriptures and let the scriptures stand on what they say... There are always those who say it means something different... According to scripture there are no new prophets coming... Brother Glen
Luke 16:16 The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.
Luke 24:27 And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.
Those verses don't say the prophets are ended. A prophet is one who speaks forth the word of Elohim.
The first verse is saying that once we get to John, the message is coming to fruition that they were speaking of. The kindgom is at hand where the king has returned and is calling his servants back in restoration and obedience.
The second merely states the tenach is speaking about Yeshua and His kindgom. Future witnesses will do the same.
Hey Al, I think you're agreeing with meI disagree with everybody...
I don't think the above standards are consistent with other--later--scriptures. If you interpret Luke 16 as the Lord declaring the end of prophets, what do you do with the prophets who show up after that time?
Acts 11:27
And in these days came prophets from Jerusalem unto Antioch. And there stood up one of them named Agabus, and signified by the Spirit that there should be great dearth throughout all the world: which came to pass in the days of Claudius Caesar.
Or, the angel on Patmos who explained, "for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy." (Revelation 19:10) In that connection we might join with Moses, "Would God that all the LORD'S people were prophets, and that the LORD would put his spirit upon them!" (Numbers 11:29). Does anyone have a testimony of Jesus?
Or the Lord's instruction on how to tell true from false prophets. Rather than say "Don't worry about it, there won't be any after John," He said, "By their fruits ye shall know them."
Then, there is Revelation 11:3 that talks about two witnesses that "shall prophesy a thousand two hundred and threescore days, clothed in sackcloth." Surely, if they prophesy they will be prophets won't they? If it's still in the future and they show up will we listen to their prophecies or just refer them to 1 Cor. 13 and let them we know they've been done away with?
Al
Advocating for obedience is not breaking the law. The one who says it is not required is:
Psa_10:13 Why do the wrong scorn Elohim? He has said in his heart, “It is not required.”
You are advocating for oral law found in judaism and their rules (which you don't follow). Scripture is clear on what to eat and not in Lev 11. That is the only true way.Where is YOUR obedience when you make things up as you go along? There is but one true way of keeping kosher - and you do not follow it.
Hey Al, I think you're agreeing with me
Dp you see Jesus as being Yahweh in human flesh? if not, you are lost in sin!I refer you to the above prophets and their words. They all speak the same message and it is never about lawlessness.
Do you believe in the pauline way of justification by grace alone faith alone, or by the false Gospel by keeping the Law?Yes, its about how a gentile is to enter into the community. Is it through judaism's way, which requires a circumcision as a right of entry, or is it through faith and then growing into obedience (as per acts 15)? Works of the law (oral law) don't gain you points.
Don't be like others on this forum and fall into this trap:
2Pe 3:15 and reckon the patience of our Master as deliverance, as also our beloved brother Sha’ul wrote to you, according to the wisdom given to him,
2Pe 3:16 as also in all his letters, speaking in them concerning these matters, in which some are hard to understand, which those who are untaught and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do also the other Scriptures.
He denied that ANY will get saved by it!Galations is all about oral law and how those "works of the law" are of no benefit for salvation. If you would like further insight on this I would be happy to help. Paul never comes against written law.
What saith the Lord?
1 Corinthians 13:8 Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will be done away with.
13 But now faith, hope, and love remain—these three.
God's word is clear. There are no prophets today to listen to. They passed away by the beginning of the 2nd century.
Paul can't and didn't change the narrative of the WHOLE SCRIPTURE. Just because he comes towards the last in the book doesn't mean the rest of the book has no meaning or is invalid. Salvation has always been the same.Do you believe in the pauline way of justification by grace alone faith alone, or by the false Gospel by keeping the Law?