I agree that Gina makes an excellent point about trying to hard to ignore different cultures and ethnicities. I think too many people try to make a big deal out of being color blind. I think we all at least notice when someone doesn't look like us. Now, to use mistreat someone based on that difference, that's bad, but to notice? Nothing wrong with that.
I hear white people use the phrase "color blind" more than anyone else. I don't know why that is. Maybe it's just my experience. But when we had a big meeting about race at my college (we had had a racially motivated attack on a student - pretty clear it was so -- they wrote "nigger" on her body in magic marker
), and the only students who used that phrase were white, and it was often preceded or followed by the inevitable statement about not being racist. It's as though their saying they were color blind proved they weren't racist, when, if anything, it seemed to indicate that they were really not all that comfortable with other races. You know, "I've got black friends . . . " and all that. But only the white students used that phrase -
that I noticed. It just seems that when someone uses that phrase they're really saying "I don't notice they're not white." I don't know, maybe that's because 'white' is the default, for lack of a better word, in American culture, and there seems to be more of a focus on not noticing that non-white people aren't white than there seems to be on not noticing that white people aren't not white. Although my old college roommate went to a predominantly black high school in St. Louis, and her friends liked to laugh and say, "Kendall isn't white!"
In many ways, I think not to notice (or to claim one doesn't notice) is ignoring what many people consider to be part of their identity. I had a professor who said she
wanted people to notice that she's black. She said that not to notice is to ignore part of her cultural identity and her uniqueness.
Again, to notice isn't bad, and some people even consider it good, but to use our physical differences in making judgements on a person's character, class, career, et cetera is when it becomes negative.
Phew! Back on topic, Kelly!
My home church had very few members that were not white. Probably fewer than 50 -- in a church with over 1000 members. And I don't think we ever had a married couple in which both parties were of different ethnicities. I don't think anyone would have been exluded from membership, but I just remember how strange peole thought it was when a white couple adopted a mixed race child. They didn't stay with the church too long after that. A mixed race couple may be
socially excluded, but since I don't think there have been any, I can't say for sure. My home church just doesn't seem to be very welcoming to non-whites. I mean, they don't tell non-white people that they can't come in, but it's just not a very receptive community. Very few non-whites who visit actually become members. I'm sorry to say I'm not too surprised.
Now I live just outside DC, and I'm the racial minority in my neighborhood (I'm white), and my office is a fairly good mix of ethnicities. The Quaker meeting I attend is certainly open to anyone of any race, and to couples of any race and ethnicity combination. Most of the people attracted to Quakerism are white, which accounts for some of the whiteness among Friends, but this meeting is more ethnically diverse than my home church. I can't contribute that to much of anything, though, given the ethnic and racial diversity of the DC metro area, as opposed to the suburbs of Richmond.