Alive in Christ said:
I am no less "qualified" than anyone else. I simply thought it was beautiful and very appropriate. Its just my opinion.
It was entitiled "Tribal Dance." To that end it simulated the tribal dances done by the native aboriginal people around here. I have witnessed many of them, and have worked on some of their reservations. They worship a heathen god, and that seems to be who she was dancing to or imitating. It is heathenism. If she was a Christian then she was practicing a syncrestic religion. That means one thinks they can believe in their God (Jesus Christ) and still worship another idol at the same time. The Israelites did this. When they worshiped Baal, they did not leave the worship of Jehovah. They worshiped Baal along with Jehovah. Their religion was syncrestic. Thus the challenge of Elijah: If Jehovah be Jehovah then worship him. If Baal be God then worship him. How long will ye halt between two opinions.
They could not worship two gods. The Lord would not allow it then.
God will not allow it today.
I have no doubt He was pleased, assuming her motives where right. And there is nothing in that video to suggest that they were'nt. She was dressed appropiately and the dancing was not erotic.
God is not pleased with the worship of false gods. This was not the worship of Jesus Christ, or the God of the Bible, the God that we know through the Bible. There is no evidence of that. It could have been the worship of some Hindu god. But it seems more likely that, as the title indicates, it was the worship of one of the native tribal gods, such as Cree, Seminole, Cherokee, Mohawk, etc.
Imitation of heathen gods is one of the most serious sins one could do. What did Moses do to the Israelites when pretended that an image of a calf was Jehovah?
If Sandy Patty or someone sings at a Billy Graham crusade, do you question her motives?
Imitation of a person is one thing. Imitation of the worship of god is quite another!
Well, when a choir sings in a traditional church...up their in front of everyone in a prominant position, (maybe your church I dont know) do you question their motives, or ask "Was God glorified, or were they glorified?
Traditional music does glorify God. Look at the words and the people who wrote them. If you don't know the testimony behind Fanny Crosby, composer of many of our hymns, you ought to familiarize yourself with her life. The same is true with such people as Spafford who wrote "It is Well With My Soul" or with John Newton, who wrote "Amazing Grace." These hymns were written from the bottom of their hearts inspired by the sorrows and joys that God gave them. They were also theologically correct for the most part. There was no way that you could mistake their worship for anyone else but the Lord Jesus Christ.
If your answer is no, then why question one but not the other?
One is clear, worshipful, and full of praise to the Lord.
The other is ambiguous, worldly, and seems to imitate an heathen god.
That fact is...in Gods beautiful wonderful Church all across this world, EVERYONE...IS..NOT...THE...SAME. There are many and various ways in which people worship God and conduct their meetings. Just because something is different than how you do it, does not necesarrily make it wrong.
Just different.
God is not glorified in all music. Listen to what Jeremiah says:
Jeremiah 10:2 Thus saith the LORD,
Learn not the way of the heathen.