Don't you think that very much parallels the increase in calvinism today?Regardless of one's view of these verses, the creeping in of gnosticism was a HUGE issue for the early church.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Don't you think that very much parallels the increase in calvinism today?Regardless of one's view of these verses, the creeping in of gnosticism was a HUGE issue for the early church.
The Bible also says to cut off your arm, pluck out your eye - yet for some reason there are not nearly as many one armed one eyed folks occupying our churches as you think there should be. It is not the Bible that is chauvinistic, it is the folks using the Bible that are. God is the ultimate "womens-libber", don't put on him your narrow fundamentalist views of the role of women.
11A woman must quietly receive instruction with entire submissiveness.
12But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet.
13For it was Adam who was first created, and then Eve.
14And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman being deceived, fell into transgression.
Don't you think that very much parallels the increase in calvinism today?
Which is where I think everyone should agree to having differing viewpoints on the topic, respect those viewpoints, and leave the topic where it is. If your church does not permit women as pastors, or in any specific leadership role, that church's rule on the subject should be respected and adhered to, in accordance with the Baptist Distinctives of local autonomy and individual liberty.JohnV is correct that gnosticism was a huge problem. But I don't agree with him that Paul's teaching about the authority of husbands had anything to do with gnosticism.
I do not see a women's ministry as being apart from the church but a pert of the church.
If the men are not leading the church and their homes then I see a problem. I believe the men should be the primary leaders. If they are not then no amount of any other ministry will make up for that. If the men lead the church then balance is possible. Men who lead, train and attract other men. If male visitors find weak male leadership then they will either leave of stay and make a difference.
If you have string female leadership and discipleship but poor male leadership and discipleship then you have a weak church and weak leadership in the home. I do not see where weak male leadership encourages submissiveness in women.
Too many churches accept the idea of weak men and strong women instead of training the men to be strong leaders. I take the position that strong male leadership also encourages strong female leadership and makes for a bold strong church working in unity and harmony instead of it being lopsided and a church full of strong females and weak males.
I am not a calvinist, but that's not true in any sense of the word. To equate the growth of a heresy (gnosticism) with the growth of Calvinism which, although I disagree, has backing from the Scriptures.
JohnV is correct that gnosticism was a huge problem. But I don't agree with him that Paul's teaching about the authority of husbands had anything to do with gnosticism.
It is with profound delight I hasten to inform you of my safe return home, and lay a modest outline of my visit to America...I have preached...sermons, including the Lenten addresses delivered in the Episcopal churches of Baltimore, where in Christ's Church I stood in front of the communion table, and St. Peter's and Grace churches by but not in the pulpits. In Lutheran, Presbyterian, Methodist, Baptist, Congregational and Unitarian churches I occupied the pulpit.
Mrs. Ormiston Chant, who is here under the auspices of the World's W.C.T.U., has recently spoken in Mr. Spurgeon's church in London with great acceptability.
More blasts from the past:
"An Englishwoman's Visit to America," Hartford Courant, July 18, 1890, p. 2:
"Eloquent Women," Washington Post, Feb. 18, 1890, p. 5:
Somewhat off topic, every church since day 1 has been wrong about something or another. Every church is probably wrong about at least one thing. If a person thinks they found a church that's right on everything, I guarantee they're spoil it by joining that church. The question is whether differing on such things is an issue. If the issues are core scriptural doctrines, then yes, there must be unity. Where they are not core scriptural issues, there must be liberty. These issues discussed here are not core scriptural issues. Hence, they're matters of liberty.so, this shows...that possibly they were wrong in 1890 too.
Each church is a sovereign body, possessing all the rights of self-government according to the law of Christ, and from its decisions there is no appeal—inasmuch as no ecclesiastical power is vested by the head of the church anywhere else. Any church can accept or reject a female evangelist without the slightest apprehension of being arraigned by any association or convention of our denomination.
"In Christ there is no male nor female."
That's why I ( a male) am married to a dude.
The night before I left Christchurch to go north I saw a large number of applicants for membership. many of whom had been brought to decision through the evangelistic labours of Mrs. Hampson.
June 10th.—On Sunday we had a larger congregation than ever at the Choral Hall. Mr. Spurgeon preached from 'My Lord and my God,' — the exclamation of Thomas when he beheld his Saviour. The lesson was,—The sin of unbelief, the mischief it wrought, and the ruin that goes with it. In the morning, 'By the grace of God I am what I am',—two good, stirring sermons. Mrs. Hampson was with us in the evening, and at the communion service offered a beautiful prayer, and thanksgiving for the poured-out blood.
—Mrs Hampson was present at Wellesley-street Church last Sunday night, which place was again crammed with people anxious to hear the son of the "prince of modern preachers."
The lady evangelist, Mrs. Hampson, who created a great sensation in New Zealand by her preaching and holding revival meetings in all the principal centres. . . .In Auckland she is destined to play an important part in the connection with the opening of the new Baptist Tabernacle.
I could be wrong, but I think he's being sarcastic, if God defines marriage between a man and a woman then God infact recognizes people as men and women, not all as one, but different sexes, which would be why He gave instructions to men and then He gave instructions for women.Excuse me! ( said in a sense, 'what did you just say' )
Girl Evangelist at Capitol Hill Baptist Church!
Washington Post, July 9, 1926, p. 10:
In a short, spirited sermon, in which she denounced the devil as "a liar and the father of lies," 10-year-old Betty Weakland, of Los Angeles, Calif., said to be the youngest preacher in the world, conducted her first services in Washington last night at the Metropolitan Baptist church, Sixth and A streets northeast.
Photo of Betty Weakland
No....you're just wrong! :tongue3: