KJB1611reader
Active Member
Hi,
I wish to know if 'sin' and 'vigor' are same? Is it okay to replace sin to vigor in a verse?
Shawn
I wish to know if 'sin' and 'vigor' are same? Is it okay to replace sin to vigor in a verse?
Shawn
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Why did the nkjv in Job 20:11 change it?Makes no sense whatsoever, bro
The words "of the sin" are in italics in the KJV, so they don't translate words from the original Hebrew. I understand that the Hebrew word translated "youth" can mean youth or vigour. So NKJV's "youthful vigour" incorporates both meanings.Why did the nkjv in Job 20:11 change it?
Baptists use various translations of the bible, depending mainly on what language they speak. A Baptist who speaks only Japanese is not likely to use any English translation, for example. As for English-speaking Baptists, some use the KJV, some use the NKJV, some use the HCSB, and so on. The KJV is only Anglican to the extent that most if not all of the translators were Anglicans. That fact doesn't make their translation unusable by Baptist and other non-Anglican Christians.So, if the KJB IS ANGLICAN.. what Bible should Baptists use?
Baptists could use the Baptist Bible. In 1842, Baptists and other believers made a revision of the KJV. It had the title The Holy Bible; being the English Version of the Old and New Testaments, made by order of King James I, carefully revised and amended, by several Biblical scholars.So, if the KJB IS ANGLICAN.. what Bible should Baptists use?
I see, I will look into this.Baptists could use the Baptist Bible. In 1842, Baptists and other believers made a revision of the KJV. It had the title The Holy Bible; being the English Version of the Old and New Testaments, made by order of King James I, carefully revised and amended, by several Biblical scholars.
In 1847, a different publisher printed an edition of it with the name "Baptist Bible" on its binding. I have a copy of a second edition of this 1842 English Bible.
Well, 'by election' wasn't fixed.Baptists could use the Baptist Bible. In 1842, Baptists and other believers made a revision of the KJV. It had the title The Holy Bible; being the English Version of the Old and New Testaments, made by order of King James I, carefully revised and amended, by several Biblical scholars.
In 1847, a different publisher printed an edition of it with the name "Baptist Bible" on its binding. I have a copy of a second edition of this 1842 English Bible.
Phoebe wrote Romans? Yet Romans opens:Apprantly, Phebe wrote Romans.... forgot a few words.. ouch.
No, I was talking to Rick about the Baptist revised A.V. in the colophon. It left out 'sent by' or something.Phoebe wrote Romans? Yet Romans opens:
“1 ¶ Paul, a bondservant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated to the gospel of God 2 which He promised before through His prophets in the Holy Scriptures,” (Ro 1:1-2 NKJV)
Phoebe is mentioned by Paul in Romans 16:
“I commend to you Phoebe our sister, who is a servant of the church in Cenchrea,” (Ro 16:1 NKJV)
But no mention of her actually writing Romans.
In that case I apologise. I had never heard of a Baptist revision of the AV before reading about it on this thread.No, I was talking to Rick about the Baptist revised A.V. in the colophon. It left out 'sent by' or something.
Its okay, here is a link.In that case I apologise. I had never heard of a Baptist revision of the AV before reading about it on this thread.
Thanks, and thanks for the link.
Please share thoughts on Rick's discovery on my other thread. Thanks.Thanks, and thanks for the link.
Not sure which other thread you mean, so I'll justsay here that I see from your link that the "Baptist version" has these words at the end of Romans 16:Please share thoughts on Rick's discovery on my other thread. Thanks.