OK, I’ve copied onto a Word file all the posts to now-- 24 pages! Since I started the thread I figure I owe a response, so I’ll try to do it by name and go through each of the posts.
Michael Wrenn, thank you!
Frogman, when you quoted John 6:29, I think you missed Jesus’ intent – the disciples had asked what God required them to do, and Jesus answered by saying “the work of God is this….” Meaning “this is the work God requires” in answer to their question, not “This is the work that God does.” And then Jesus told them to believe. This is something they were to do, not a work, but faith. If faith were a work, then Paul would not have stated in Ephesians that we are saved by grace through faith, and not by works! Faith is biblically separated from works and is not a work as far as the biblical definition there is concerned. Thus, the only thing an unbeliever can ‘do’ to please God, or ‘do God’s work’ is believe – which is no work at all but rather an attitude or heart response, which the disciples understood.
You stated again in your next post that it is the work ‘of’ God in the sense that God does the work, but if you take the verse in context as Jesus’ response to the disciples, which is what should be done, you will see he is showing them that God requires NO work, but does require belief. The verse never indicates that God is the one who does this work, but rather that this is all anyone can do, which is not a work at all!
In the meantime, the works of BELIEVERS do have rewards, which I think is something we all agree on? But salvation itself being a reward? No way. I fully agree with you here. But I think perhaps yelsew is using the word ‘reward’ as a synonym for ‘consequence.’ I hope he will correct me if I have him wrong on this.
Later you seemed to indicate that you felt that the saved Christian might have less free will than the unsaved person according to what we are presenting. No, that is not true at all. Men are free on either side of that fence. You will notice that Genesis 8:21, when God is speaking to Noah, says that the TENDENCY or INCLINATION (depends on your translation) of every man’s heart is to the evil, even from childhood. However tendencies can be fought against, and our entire system of laws is built on this presumption. Regeneration changes the heart from this tendency to a new heart, TENDING toward God Himself. This is why the unregenerate finds it so easy to make excuses for the wrong things he does (and he knows they are wrong – especially if he gets caught!), and the Christian is saddened by them and repents. We don’t WANT to do wrong things, or sin, even though we still do. This is the change in heart. We are still free to choose whether or not to sin in either case – and this is why Christians still sin. We battle the flesh. But the unregenerate battle the actual knowledge they have of the truth and will eventually either suppress or bow to it. Those who do the latter, believing the truth to actually be true, will be led to Christ, who IS the Truth. But unregenerate or regenerate, our wills remain free; it is the tendencies/inclinations of our hearts which change. This is the change from the heart we have hardened towards the reality of our own sins and the truth and the heart which embraces God – THE Truth. No will is unable to make a choice during life here on earth. At the point of death, however, no change is possible.
I will add here that I do strongly suspect ‘deathbed repentances’ as unless the person has actually been searching for the truth his or her whole life, rather than progressively hardening their own hearts to it, they wouldn’t recognize it at that point any more than they did days before or weeks before.
In your last post (as I am reading them now), you stated that Romans 11 states WHY the Jews rejected Christ. No, it doesn’t. It tells the results; how God used their rejection. What would have happened otherwise is something locked away in God’s knowledge, not ours. But I do know there would always have been a way for all of us, no matter what the Jews did. For God so loved the WORLD.
The Calvinists want to claim the use of the world there means either simply the elect or people from all parts of the world, but there is nothing to indicate that in the verse apart from the presupposition of Calvinism. Consider for instance that the world would hate us, as it hated Him first. That use of ‘world’ is most certainly not referring to the elect!
Yelsew, I agree with many of your posts, but disagree with your response to Frogman, for the reasons stated above. I think it is mostly a semantic thing, but since I am trying to respond to everyone here….
I do agree entirely with your first response to massdak (which is as far as I have gotten as I type this!)
You told John Own later that faith is regeneration, and with this I do disagree. Faith is the path or open door through which Christ enters and then works His saving grace of regeneration through the agency of the Holy Spirit. But faith itself is not salvation or regeneration. It is, rather, the way by which it enters.
Later you were making a distinction between faith and hope – that God gives us hope but ‘has no faith to give.’ That is a fascinating concept and I want to run that by Barry and think on it awhile. According to the Hebrews definition of faith, I think you are right! I had not thought of this before. But we know God does give us hope, and, yes, that is an entirely different matter. Thank you for getting me to think again about something new to me.
Note: just as I was finishing down at the bottom with Ransom, Barry woke up and came in (he’s a late sleeper!). I told him about your distinction between faith and hope and that God has no faith to give, and he agreed he had never thought about that before in your terms. His response was “Well done!” – meaning, more right now I think, that it is definitely worth thinking about more than that he fully agrees. We’ll be doing some thinking here!
I definitely appreciated your responses to the list of Bible verses given by John Owen. Thank you for indicating their context to those who are reading this thread.
massdak, If God were responsible for our belief, then we would not be begged, literally, by Jesus and the Apostles, to believe. Belief or unbelief are both resting on the individual as his free response to God, and have nothing to do with sin nature. Even a sinner can respond to something good, and God is most certainly good!
tnelson, Romans 1:16 is completely in line with the need to hear the Gospel in order to have faith in Jesus. Romans 9:16 points out that our works mean nothing, but we are saved by God’s mercy – His grace. Neither of these verses have anything to do with the idea of predestination or that God regenerates before He engenders belief in a person.
Yelsew answered you well there, I think.
John Owen, thank you for your responses. I do think you touched a raw nerve when you seemed to indicate that only Calvinists were Christians! Your response to yelsew on this point really was rather rude. It was not a matter of pleasing him, but of implying that if anyone is not a Calvinist he is going to hell!
You used the term ‘saving faith’, as though faith saved. It does not. We are saved by GRACE – God’s grace – but THROUGH faith – our faith. Faith is the tunnel, or path, that God has used to exercise the grace of salvation in us. That path belongs to each of us. We can do nothing but open our hearts, and that gift of opening or keeping shut is ours, and is a gift – also free – from God. Jesus truly stands at the door and knocks. IF any man open, THEN He will enter. If faith indeed were what saved, then of course it would have to be from God. But faith is the path – the open door—, not the grace, and it is grace which saves.
If belief were to come after salvation, first of all, it would not be necessary, and secondly, the Bible would not plead for sinners – the unregenerate – to believe!
Being born again certainly increases faith, but that bit that opens the door, however fearfully or hesitantly, is man’s response to Christ. From that point on, as we are matured in Christ through the Holy Spirit, our faith and trust grow as our knowledge of God Himself grows. But that first response – it is a response. It is the response of a drowning man to a life preserver thrown to him. He did not make it or throw it, but he is allowed to choose whether or not to grab onto it.
Then you seemed to say, if I understood you correctly, that if faith were not a gift, it would be a work! Faith is a response, one way or the other, and is clearly defined by Paul as NOT being a work! So I don’t think it is right to try to separate the definitions as a matter of timing. Faith either is or is not a work, not matter when it occurs, and the Bible clearly separates faith from work!
No, of course a man cannot pull himself up by his own bootstraps. But a man can choose to hold onto the rope that Christ is pulling him up with! There is a big difference.
Your use of Philippians 2:12 – 13 does not work here. Paul is encouraging the Philippians, because for the saved person it is indeed God who is working through them, reaching out to the rest of the world. And that is something that should indeed cause us some fear and trembling lest our own personalities and faults get in the way! As I mentioned in another post, however, in verse 13, the word translated “works” in relation to God is the Greek ‘energeo’, which means to put energy into. God is energizing the believer to do the works God has created for him to do. That is the Greek meaning of that passage and is fully in line with Ephesians 2:10 which stated that “we are God’s workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.” The Philippians verse has nothing to do with coming to salvation, but with life after salvation.
And yes, God changes the heart from that TENDING toward evil all the time to one TENDING to Him (good) all the time. But God does not do that AGAINST the person’s will. God does not change the will if the person is not willing for that change to be made. That is one of the major themes of the Bible: “I would….but you were not willing….” Is something we see from Jesus concerning Jerusalem as well as other times in the Old Testament. We are allowed to oppose God’s will for us for this time on earth. We are allowed to choose to allow Him to change us or not. This most certainly does not even slightly dent or scratch is divine omnipotence and sovereignty. He is bigger than that.
Please, I don’t think yelsew is coming anywhere near close to a Roman Catholic view. The Bible simply asks us to believe. This is our correct response to God and the open door through which He will walk. But we don’t walk; He does. We don’t do the work; He does. To term belief as a work is contrary to the Bible. And belief is all we are asked to show.
If you look at his posts you will see that he never says that salvation is not ALL of the Lord. It is just that we can choose to accept or reject. That does not mean we have produced or helped with, in any way, our own salvation. It simply means we have repented of our sins and accepted it.
Can repentance come before salvation? Most assuredly! John’s baptism came first.
Coming down to your response to the math homework – it went well. She caught me in a couple of errors as we were working out the equations and that was wonderful! It showed she was really understanding the whole thing. It’s been a long time since I taught that part of math (factoring polynomials and multiple quadratics) and I was rusty. She is doing great!
You said it is incumbent on me to show the Calvinist is not exegeting the Bible properly. I think I have done that in some of the responses here as well as in a number of other posts.
I would say one thing about the Reformation here: people are being encouraged to equate it with Calvinism, and I don’t think that is really proper. There were many who were against Calvinist interpretations during the Reformation. It should also be noted that there were thousands who did not hold to Roman Catholic teachings from the beginning of that church with Constantine – people and groups the RC church tried constantly to eradicate – but, as we know from Christ’s promise, His church has stood through the ages and the gates of hell have not been able to swallow it up.
Going on down in some of the exchanges again, the devils have intellectual acknowledgement of the reality of God and Jesus and the Holy Spirit. They do know the truth, for they were there and have had (if not still, then certainly at one time) access to the Throne of God. The Bible does NOT say, by the way, that demons have faith. It says the demons know/believe there is ONE God – and shudder. That intellectual acknowledgement has nothing to do with faith in God. They do not need faith; for where knowledge is, faith is no longer necessary. The writer to the Hebrews states that faith is ‘being sure of what we HOPE for and certain of what WE DO NOT SEE.’ This is not the position the demons are in. They have no faith in God. They have seen Him.
KayDee, regeneration IS salvation. I don’t’ see how you can separate the two. When you are regenerated you are reborn spiritually and this is the saving thing God does for us.
Your quote of 2Thessalonians 2:13-14 is a good one for pointing out something Calvinists either miss or ignore. There is nothing there about being predestined to salvation. Rather, the way of salvation has been predestined (through the Spirit AND through belief in the truth) and there is no other way. Belief in the truth is our responsibility as clearly shown by Paul in Romans 1:
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men WHO SUPPRESS the truth by their wickedness, SINCE WHAT MAY BE KNOWN ABOUT GOD IS PLAIN TO THEM, BECAUSE GOD HAS MADE IT PLAIN TO THEM. (the emphasis is obviously mine)
Thus the second Thessalonians quote is pointing out that the response to the truth, by believing it, is imperative for salvation, for one cannot choose the lie and then expect the Holy Spirit will somehow override that and work his sanctification in the person.
Note also that verse 14 says we were called by the Gospel, not that we were predestined. The Gospel comes by hearing….etc. We are taught the truth, one way or another, or even have it divinely revealed to us – and are allowed to respond to it as we choose. Those who believe will be drawn to Christ by God and none who are drawn will be turned away. But it is really important that somehow Calvinists recognize the full message of the Gospel – of the entire Bible – that there is a call to simply believe to all men, and that all men are capable of that response and the choice between the lie and the Truth is freely available to all men from all times and places.
And you also misquoted Jesus in his explanation to Nicodemus. He did not say that a man must be born again to either see or understand the Kingdom of God, but that he must be born again to ENTER the Kingdom of God. I am not disputing that this may also include seeing and understanding, but simply that what you said Jesus said is not really what was said.
Brutus, Would you please show us where the Bible indicates a ‘stupor’ involved with spiritual death? Death is separation, not insensibility.
Ransom, I think you can see from the discussions that others are not considering this a ‘straw man.’ It has engendered quite a bit of discussion! You are considering faith a work. It is not – Paul makes that very clear. So for the Calvinist to claim that faith before regeneration is a work or an ‘act’ that pleases God is wrong. It is a response to God – freely allowed and biblically encouraged.
Please note that in your Acts passage, Lydia was already a worshipper of God. She was already responding to the truth that she knew. God honored that by giving her the understanding of more truth – the truth of Jesus. She had already made her choice according to as much knowledge as she had. God drew her to Christ. But her response to the truth and the resultant worship of God had come first. You shouldn’t have ignored that.
If we felt the Calvinist position was indeed the biblical position, we would not be fighting it. But we honestly feel it maligns the character of God and is not at all what the Bible is presenting.
Your use of Lazarus as an example is a faulty one. Elijah, too, raised a boy from the dead (presumably apart from his permission), as did Peter. None of these things have to do with spiritual regeneration, however. They instead show the power of God over death to all who pay attention.
Does obedience require regeneration? No, it doesn’t. If it did, then all the unregenerate would at all times be breaking all Ten Commandments. That is something we do not see. Rather, with the Orthodox Jews as an excellent example, we see very law-abiding people who are not regenerate – they are obeying, to the best of their ability, the OT law as they understand it.
=============
Thank you all for your patience with this post. I have tried to respond to everyone as I could.
Helen