That's like saying if God ahbored polygamy, he would have told Solomon not to marry multiple women. The issue isn't addressed in 1 Kings because that wasn't the intent of the narrative. Likewise, the issue of disruption wasn't the intend of the letter to the Galatians.
You are confusing the issue. I stand by what I said. And the women aren't told to sit in silence, as much as they are told to LEARN in silence.
A common argument is that, if Paul's intend was to say "Bishops should be men", then he would have said "be a husband", or "be men", or, "be a husband of A wife". But he said a husband of ONE wife. Although polygamy was not a common practice at the time, bigamy and adultery were rampant, as was a permeation of polygamy into certain facets of Jewish society.
Wrong. The word "man" is used, in reference to a man running his household. If HE cannot run his own house, how is HE to be trusted to run a house of God.
Women pastors are banned, in scripture. You just cannot intellectualize your way out of that.