Just curious. How many years ago did your write this article?
I believe the original article was 5 or 6 years old. I have since revised it at least twice.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Just curious. How many years ago did your write this article?
Oswald Chambers described some older Christians well.
"In dealing with other people, our stance should always be to drive them toward making a decision of their will. That is how surrendering to God begins. Not often, but every once in a while, God brings us to a major turning point— a great crossroads in our life. From that point we either go toward a more and more slow, lazy, and useless Christian life, or we become more and more on fire, giving our utmost for His highest— our best for His glory."
Then this day shall evermore be known as the day asterisktom took on Osward Chambers (The Oswald Chambers) and won for himself literary immortality.
I'm going to put an entry in my journal so that when my grandkids ask me what I was doing on that fateful day, I will be able to refresh my memory.
Get rid of your preacher and do away with the sermon.
When you find a church that has a perfect pastor don't join it.No, that is not what I am saying. I am not one of those "Just me and my Bible" Christians. We need pastors. But we need them to be faithful and reasonably accurate. We need authors too. But with the same standard.
Oswald, as I have shown in the article - to which no one has given rebuttal - does not follow that pattern in the Bible.
When you find a church that has a perfect pastor don't join it.
I take it as proof, when one responds either with a snide or puerile manner, that no substantive, Scriptural answer could be found to my article.
Literary immortality means nothing to me. Your snickering judgment of my motives means even less. What I want to be is faithful to the Lord who saved me and gave me (along with all believers) a charge to diligently search the scriptures and earnestly contend for the faith.
You have every right my friend to think whatever you want. Personally, I would not waste the time to offer substantive, Scriptural rebuttals. The subject is not a systematic theology work. To put it another way, I think you have too much free time on your hands.
With all due respect, you remind me of the kid we all called "the brain" in sixth grade, the guy who always had the answer and ironed his homework papers before handing them in. Your the guy who was always correcting the teacher. Offering up critical comments on a classic work is really Tom, not your forte.
Here is a nother one liner from the Bible.I tire of your shoot-from-the-hip one-liners. Don't expect me to waste any more comments on you.
Here is a nother one liner from the Bible.
"A rebuke goes deeper into one who has understanding than a hundred blows into a fool."
Your point is . . . ?Matthew 5:22
You're going to hell.![]()
Explain what hell is.You're going to hell.![]()
I believe Tom is interested in showing off his so-called literary skills by attacking various authors. Nothing is as anoying as one who toots their own horn continually.
Parting comment: Don't call someone "friend" and "with all due respect" and then say such disrespectful, unfriendly things. Don't be phony.
So is Chambers ok to read or not?