Like I said, nothing about the "meanings" runs contrary to what it is describing like my "being full" analogy. Each one of those phrases has a different meaning, but all describe the same thing.No it is not closed- and certainly, once again, not just because you say so. Terms have meanings. I am disappointed in you, Webdog. Terms have meanings- no one should argue with that.
Look these terms up in Strong's for goodness' sake and you will see they each mean their own thing.
You are the one who needs to abuse terms and make them synonyms to prop up your theology. Let the terms stand as they are and you will become a Calvinist.
Terms have meanings, Webdog. They have meanings. You don't get to redefine them all as synonyms. Everybody knows that.
If the case is not closed...answer the last 3 questions I presented then.