Annsni's pronouncement that:
would seemingly preclude Margaret Thatcher as PM, a lady being in any leadership role over men in business, etc. even if her husband fully supported her (or, in ituttut's lingo, she was being "obedient" and he "didn't protest").
we see clearly that in no way are women to be in leadership over men - and Paul's reasoning is creation. It's not a "just for that time" situation but for ALL time.
would seemingly preclude Margaret Thatcher as PM, a lady being in any leadership role over men in business, etc. even if her husband fully supported her (or, in ituttut's lingo, she was being "obedient" and he "didn't protest").