Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Could it be?
A lady teacher of a co-ed class at Johnson Ferry Baptist of Marietta (pastored by the current President of the Southern Baptist Convention:thumbs![]()
And that is your right. I think I'd pick the Biblical one.
Robert Snow said:Let me ask you, are women at the church you attend allowed to speak at all?
Nope. Wrong again. That's the you don't know what you're talking about meter. Congrats. :thumbsup:
Whenever anyone who is a believer mocks someone for adhering to Scripture, reading Scripture, then they're going to hear what I've said. You included. And he earned it.
Whoa?!? You're getting a bit heated there, man. Maybe sit a couple of plays out.
Nobody is mocking you for adhering to the Bible. Sometimes sarcasm is a helpful tool in highlighting problematic interpretation or theology.
Sure. They're just not allowed to teach men in the church.
Doesn't the same bible say:
1Co 14:34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law.
Yep. Which is precisely why we don't let them preach or teach men.
If they are allowed to speak at all, anywhere at church, they are in violation of the literal meaning of this scripture.
So according to this understanding of the assembly coming together... women can't sing, say amen, vote by saying Aye (though if they raised their hand quietly that would be ok), say hello to people during the welcome (if you have one) etc, etc, or they would be violating the "keep silent" command of Paul.
Perhaps there is another understanding, just saying
This would still disallow pastoring, since the qualifications are the husband of one wife.
If they are allowed to speak at all, anywhere at church, they are in violation of the literal meaning of this scripture.
So according to this understanding of the assembly coming together... women can't sing, say amen, vote by saying Aye (though if they raised their hand quietly that would be ok), say hello to people during the welcome (if you have one) etc, etc, or they would be violating the "keep silent" command of Paul.
Perhaps there is another understanding, just saying
But Bob, doesn't it seem like a stretch to take this 1st century detail, which doesn't speak directly to the issue of gender, to mean it can't be women. It would seem more likely that Paul wrote "husband of one wife" because it seemed obvious at the time that they would be men, since women weren't allowed to do much in that context. If Paul had said "must be a man, not a woman" it would be a different interpretive story.
Plus, the whole issue of church leadership seems to be on more of an ad hoc basis, allowing fluidity for the particular context.