Rules of posting on the board are clearly stated at the bottom of every page. Follow those and it will be a civil discussion.We need a brief set of rules for the thread if the experiment is to be meaningful.
Things that will hamper the following:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Rules of posting on the board are clearly stated at the bottom of every page. Follow those and it will be a civil discussion.We need a brief set of rules for the thread if the experiment is to be meaningful.
Things that will hamper the following:
Anyone can point out to anyone else if they think he is getting personal or inflammatory.
Rules of posting on the board are clearly stated at the bottom of every page. Follow those and it will be a civil discussion.
But the pivotal thing in this experiment is that each of his rebukes his OWN- not just those of the other persuasion.
It would also be helpful if we would compliment thoughtful posts made by those of the opposite persuasion on occasion, not just spur along those who oppose our opponents' position.
Just start your thread Luke. I don't understand how a person rebukes his own post. Follow the rules of the board, and all will be fine.
Originally Posted by Skandelon
Luke,
Please allow me to cut to the heart of this matter...
Before a sin like murder, molestation, torture or some other heinous crime is committed there is a temptation or a thought that comes into the mind of the criminal, right?
Now, who is the first person who thought of the heinous sin of molesting and torturing a small child? Did God originate that thought or did it originate in the mind of a sinful criminal?
1. If God, then you have to defend your position that God is not the author of evil.
2. If the criminal, then you have to defend your position that God "controls all things," because you have someone creating or originating something apart from God.
Luke, you accuse me of breaking the rules.Reread the post.
I did not say one rebukes his own post- those of his persuasion.
If a Calvinist gets out of line- then I will point it out.
If someone with a nameless theology like yourself gets out of line- you will rebuke them.
Understand?
That is a good question. It would be good for Luke to think through it.Are you going to address my question in this new thread too?
Luke, you accuse me of breaking the rules.
Ask others how often you break the rules. Shall I tell you how many reports I have received of you breaking the rules. If you can't keep the rules of the board, why should I have any confidence in you keeping another set of rules. I don't. First, show your integrity by keeping the board's rules. I am not going to succumb to your rules when you cannot even keep the rules of this board. If you want to have this discussion it is on the basis of the rules of this board. Otherwise just forget the whole idea.
That is a good question. It would be good for Luke to think through it.
That's up to you.Apparently this thread is not going to happen.
I am not going to talk about a subject of this magnitude and complexity with all the normal, stupid distractions.
Luke are you going to answer Skandelon?
It looks like prophecy is one of my gifts...See post 250.
Yes. I know you are excited about the question because it is a very good question.
I will answer it- but I will not deal with all the regular stupid mess that goes along with these discussions if I am to discuss this good and complex subject.
webdog said:I suspect a confusing answer meant to divert based on past interaction, but we'll see.
See post 250.
Yes. I know you are excited about the question because it is a very good question.
I will answer it- but I will not deal with all the regular stupid mess that goes along with these discussions if I am to discuss this good and complex subject.
I will answer it- but I will not deal with all the regular stupid mess that goes along with these discussions if I am to discuss this good and complex subject.
Still true.![]()
Then don't make them.Apparently this thread is not going to happen.
I am not going to talk about a subject of this magnitude and complexity with all the normal, stupid distractions.