Which is why only Calvinism is correct. It is the very definition of solid exegesis wroght from proper hermeneutics.
But is i asystem of theology inspired, as the Apostles Paul/Peter/John etc were?
I believe in the points of it, more of a moderate form, but also realise that neither a Calvinist nor an arminian can claim their syatem is "perfect/only correct" way to understand the Bible, as those systems came from scholars theologians but NONE were Apostles!
Agree more with Calvinism than with Arminianism , but cannot with dogmatism state that it is the "only correct way to understand Bible" as at times think we tend to have such a rigid mindset on the points cannot see "grey areas" or take seriously some of the "problems" within system
just saying, we can have a "better" way to see bible, but not "perfect/correct" as none of us are Apostles for today!
Last edited by a moderator: