Dr. Walter
New Member
GE:
Re:
DW:
“The lunar cyle does not promote an evenly divided month of seven day weeks (28) but is nearer to 30 days. The earliest counting in the book of Genesis does not follow calendars divided evenly by seven days but 30 day months and 360 day years. See the account of Noah and the flood the counting method.”
GE:
Yea yea for the umpteenth time!
Listen who talks “hot air”!
Your real good at making personal insults but not too good at giving clear responses. I take by your answer you are in agreement that God's natural Calendar indicators do not operate on a seven day cycle and that the earliest recorded calendar of months and year do not operate on an evenly divided seven day cycle. Good, that is a start.
Re:
DW,
“The Sabbath law simply sets forth a set of seven days that necessarily precede and follow a Sabbath ONCE IT IS BEGUN.”
GE:
Yea yea, “once it is begun” AS PER “the earliest counting in the book of Genesis” in the creation-account there, where and when NO “sabbath”, “preceded”, and where and when THE, Sabbath by the Name of “The Day The Seventh Day” –of the creation-week, FOLLOWED and ENDED the cycle of the week or “set of seven days” “ONCE” it had “BEGUN”! Surprise surprise….!
Once again, I take by your answer you agree that a Sabbath had to begin somewhere and where it began it was followed by six preceding days and hence it preceded the next six working days.
Re:
DW:
“It (the Sabbath) can fit any kind of human calendar and fall on ANY DAY OF the calendar whether if the day is defined by NUMBER or by NAME. Whether it fell on FRIDAY in the Egyptian Calendar or fell on Saturday in the Jewish Calendar.”
GE:
You need help Doctor; you need a doctor; a head-doctor.
The Sabbath of the Genesis and the Fourth Commandment – of the whole Bible for that matter – never “fell on FRIDAY”; it never “fell … in the Egyptian Calendar ”; it never, “fell on Saturday in the Jewish Calendar”.
Historically, Friday was the Sabbath of the Egyptians. I don't know of anyone who disagrees with that except perhaps you. That is pretty general knowledge. If as you say it "never" fell on Saturday in the Jewish Calendar then your boat is sunk as that is one of the primary arguments for Saturdarians.
THINK for a change, Gerard and all Saturdarians and their view, are RIGHT because THE ACCOUNTS of the giving of the Sabbath Day in the creation and in the different Commandments, RESTRICT the Sabbath Day and Sabbath-principle, to only ONE APPLICATION— The Seventh Day of the CREATION- and COMMANDMENT-week, in ANY kind of calendar where The Seventh Day of the week might be indicated as ‘SATURDAY’.
As I understand your statement above you are arguing that the Sabbath always falls on the "seventh" day after six working days regardless of the calendar and regardless of the day of the week in that calendar! Is that correct or am I misunderstanding what you are saying??? If so, that is precisely my own argument. Hence, you are admitting that in some calendars the Sabbath may not fall on Saturday but on Monday or Wednesday IF according to that particular calendar six working days begins with Sunday or Tuesday or Thursday in that particular calendar????? Is that what you are saying? Or are you saying every calender "week" must begin with Sunday and end with Saturday????? Make yourself clear!
Because:
_God_, applies the Sabbath and the Sabbath-Law beyond any particular calendar, spot-on, onto the particular ‘day-of-the-week' : "The-Day-The-Seventh-Day-Sabbath-of-the-LORD GOD” … proving it an absolute PRINCIPLE of The Sabbath’s Rest-Day after and before EVERY “six working days” THAT MAY NEVER BE CONFUSED FOR the particular ‘day-of-the-week' : "The-Day-The-Seventh-Day-Sabbath-of-the-LORD GOD”.
It appears from the above you are either quoting me and then mocking me or you are asserting your own position! Which is it? Your response format is very confusing. You introduce the above statement with the word "Because" and then seem to be stating your own position! Is that true? If so, then you position is my own position as that is precisely my own position.
Your response format is very confusing and may account for the misunderstandings you seem to acknowledge in previous posts. Why don't you simply quote me and place it in the shaded format the way I do and then place your response in the clear format the way I do so there is no confusion between quoting what I say and what you say?
[/QUOTE]
Last edited by a moderator: