Get something straight, Luke: I will always call you out when you make an ambiguous comment that can--and usually is--construed as derogatory towards others. And I'll continue to call you on it, as I have here, until you finally explain yourself...which you've finally done. You telling me I am going to chill out...well, ask yourself: If *I* told *you* that, how would you receive it?
Further, if I made the statement that you assaulted me, you and I both know you'd be the first one to ask for the proof. So provide the proof, or admit that your use of the term was a little over the top. Unless you actually do feel that I've violently attacked you.
It does. It also points out that when individuals choose to use their own definitions for terms, it causes confusion that requires explanation.
As for my "elitism" statement, here's two things: You've now explained yourself, and as I pointed out in an earlier post, here's where I say: Oh, that's what you meant; I didn't understand what you meant, thanks for finally clarifying it. My bad.
Second, my caution to you is, the way you described "redneckism" in your response to Bob ... is not "redneck." It may be *your* definition of redneck, but it's not the generally accepted definition of the term, as has been evidenced by the discussion here between Bob and EWF.
What you described is described in Revelations as "the lukewarm church," which is rather to be spit out. It's not reserved for rednecks, or any other particular group. And like you, I despise it, as we all should.
I introduced the term "redneck" so it was my responsibility to define it as I meant it which I might not have done completely.
Your definition of redneck is not accurate though.
World English Dictionary
redneck (ˈrɛdˌnɛk) [Click for IPA pronunciation guide]
— n
1. (in the southwestern US) a poor uneducated White farm worker
2. a person or institution that is extremely reactionary
The two together really encompass what I meant.
I was referring to people who are uneducated and reactionary. I mean people who have no business talking about most things they talk about but are too arrogant to know it.
Elitism is not as big a problem as this thing I am describing as redneckism.
Elitists, in my understanding, tend to be snobby educated people- BUT AT LEAST THEY HAVE SOME BASIS for their arrogance. They are EDUCATED. I am not saying it is ok. It is not.
But these people, who I am referring to as rednecks (not country boys- I am one of them), are AT LEAST as arrogant as the elitist from Harvard BUT THEY HAVE NO BASIS FOR SUCH ARROGANCE.
There are people who allow knowledge to puff them up- this is not good.
Then there are people who are puffed up without knowledge- this is far worse.
So when you, or whoever it was, made the offensive, derogatory and, I think ignorant remark that Calvinists tend to be arrogant- I'd say they tend to be less arrogant than these people I am referring to as rednecks.
Calvinists, in my experience, do tend to be more educated. For example, many if not MOST Presbyterian movements REQUIRE their ministers to have seminary education.
And perhaps there are many of them who have allowed their advantage in learning to puff them up- this is not good.
But far worse are people with little to NO theological training who spout off at the mouth incessantly their views and attack the views of others- this is arrogance to the inth degree.
If a man is not familiar with terms like infralapsarianism, the tetragrammaton, theology proper, Gnosticism, Docetism, Dualism, Modalistic Monarchianism, etc... if he does not know what the three major ecumenical creeds are and what they state, how the New Testament was canonized; if he doesn't know who Origen or Athanasius or Arius was- then he ought to approach something as deep and heavy as theology and church history with great humility. He ought to keep his words few on those matters.
But the people to whom I am referring as rednecks think they know so much that they can speak with as much authority as Al Mohler or D. A. Carson.
These types of people with no theological training but not enough humility to properly muzzle themselves- they are the dangerous ones, imo.