Nope, but nice way to spin it.
See, there are several (including yourself) who say they see one way; there are several, including myself, who say they see another way. So if you say that you've seen it in hundreds of churches, so according to you it must be true of "many"; but I say I've seen it another way in hundreds of churches, so it must be true of "many"; which one is correct? Which one has more validity?
In other words, experiential evidence is based on a rather small subset, no matter how many times you claim "hundreds."
In another thread, now closed, I posed to you that there were at least 9,300 IFB churches; John of Japan has recently supplied the number of over 13,000. In that thread, you had supplied a link to churches claiming support for the KJ; however, none of them had "KJV Only" listed. I also pointed out that on that site, there were many duplicates, and quite a few advertisements rather than church listings. It took me three states to get a number of 114 churches claiming KJ support. Giving your argument the benefit of the doubt, I presented a statistical guesstimation/assumption that 75% were KJVO; at 38 churches per state (averaging the number from the three states that I counted up), that was 1,900. 75% of that is 1,425. For the sake of this argument, I'm assuming that all 75% are also shouting dictators. Out of 13,000 IFB churches, that represents about 11% of KJVO. Even if we make a leap of logic and bump that to 25%, we're still talking 3,250 churches out of 13,000.
So--experiential evidence is that y'all have seen hundreds of churches that fit the description. Statistics say the probability is that there are thousands that don't fit that description.
Suffice to say, my only point with this is that it's tiring to see all the IFB bashing, that inadvertantly lumps all IFBers into the same category.