You just negated the cross. We have NO role in our salvation. It is not by works lest any man shall boast!
I've explained part of it in my post# 73 , guess you don't bother reading what others write to you.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You just negated the cross. We have NO role in our salvation. It is not by works lest any man shall boast!
So if I bow my head and pray while I'm holding my purse, my purse is an idol? Get real!!
OK - So you say that bowing your head over something is idolatry then what is rosary beads? Oh yes - an idol!! Hmmm.......
I really am shocked by the stance you have on the Word of God - as if it is nothing and worthless. That is disgusting IMO.
They have nothing to do with salvation.
They appeal to the emotions, the carnal part of oneself.
They also fall under the category of idolatry according to the Ten Commandments.
Walter, I'm glad you brought that up because I have seen several churches where the stations were nothing more than Roman numerals on the wall. There is nothing to bow to.I think it is important that we not misrepresent what Catholics (and apparently other Christians) are doing and why they bow during the Stations of the Cross. Catholics, during each 'Station of the Cross', bow at the words 'we adore you O Christ and we praise You, for by Your cross You have redeemed the world'. I asked a Catholic if they are were 'bowing to' anything during the stations of the cross and they said 'absolutetly not' we are adoring Jesus the Lord.' My Catholic friend mentioned that 'Stations of the Cross' is a meditation that does not require pictures, statues, etc. He said, 'in fact, most people probably practice this meditation while only using a prayer book. A far cry from being guilty of idolotry if you ask me'.
About those rosary beads,I am pretty sure that the prayers that Mary offers to Jesus on our behalf reach him with more effect than your own.
Why ask Mary to pray for us? For the same reason you would ask the person that goes to your church to pray for you.
Why ask the person that goes to your church to pray for you. if praying directly to Jesus does it all. Why ask another to pray for you period.
Did you read from the Bible those verses that I pointed out where God permits the use of religious statues and images , so long as we avoid idolatry ?
And by the way, I am a Catholic revert and I have studied the Bible religiously as a Baptist fundamentalist, now as a Catholic I read it dailey as it was intended to be interpreted , just the very same way as did those Catholic Bishops that interpreted all those many different canonical and non- canonical books that they had to seperate. In order to know which were Canonical, those bishops had to have known the correct" One True " interpretation. By saying that the Catholic Church has the wrong interpretation , how can you be sure that all the Books in your NT are the correct ones ? And don't give me some malarky story. the Holy Bible never had a 'Table of Contents ' to list which Books belonged in the completed Bible. It was the bishops and the bishops alone through the guidence of the HS that gave us the correct List of Canon. Can you imagine if one of the many thousands of other churches ,if one of them attempted at selecting the correct Books with their Johnny-come-lately man-made interpretation, our Holy Bible would most definitely be classified as an unholy bible book.
There only was and still only "One True Interpretation' and it belongs to Christs' Apostolic Church, [ Luke 10:16] that is the only Church that contains the 'Fullness of the Christian Faith".
Then why bow down?Walter, I'm glad you brought that up because I have seen several churches where the stations were nothing more than Roman numerals on the wall. There is nothing to bow to.
Some years ago in northern India the extremist Hindus tore down an ancient Muslim Mosque because they said it was the birthplace of their "god" Ram. A statue was erected of Ram. They bow down and pray to Ram. Who are they praying to? The piece of wood and metal, or the god that it represents? If you want to insult the Hindu, tell them what you just explained to me. They are praying to the god that the statue represents just like you do, just like all pagans do. I can't believe the superstitions and paganism that the RCC so gullibly believes and practices!I think it is important that we not misrepresent what Catholics (and apparently other Christians) are doing and why they bow during the Stations of the Cross. Catholics, during each 'Station of the Cross', bow at the words 'we adore you O Christ and we praise You, for by Your cross You have redeemed the world'. I asked a Catholic if they are were 'bowing to' anything during the stations of the cross and they said 'absolutetly not' we are adoring Jesus the Lord.' My Catholic friend mentioned that 'Stations of the Cross' is a meditation that does not require pictures, statues, etc. He said, 'in fact, most people probably practice this meditation while only using a prayer book. A far cry from being guilty of idolotry if you ask me'.
Prove it....About those rosary beads,I am pretty sure that the prayers that Mary offers to Jesus on our behalf reach him with more effect than your own.
Why ask Mary to pray for us? For the same reason you would ask the person that goes to your church to pray for you.
Why ask the person that goes to your church to pray for you. if praying directly to Jesus does it all. Why ask another to pray for you period.
Did you read from the Bible those verses that I pointed out where God permits the use of religious statues and images , so long as we avoid idolatry ?
And by the way, I am a Catholic revert and I have studied the Bible religiously as a Baptist fundamentalist, now as a Catholic I read it dailey as it was intended to be interpreted , just the very same way as did those Catholic Bishops that interpreted all those many different canonical and non- canonical books that they had to seperate. In order to know which were Canonical, those bishops had to have known the correct" One True " interpretation. By saying that the Catholic Church has the wrong interpretation , how can you be sure that all the Books in your NT are the correct ones ? And don't give me some malarky story. the Holy Bible never had a 'Table of Contents ' to list which Books belonged in the completed Bible. It was the bishops and the bishops alone through the guidence of the HS that gave us the correct List of Canon. Can you imagine if one of the many thousands of other churches ,if one of them attempted at selecting the correct Books with their Johnny-come-lately man-made interpretation, our Holy Bible would most definitely be classified as an unholy bible book.
There only was and still only "One True Interpretation' and it belongs to Christs' Apostolic Church, [ Luke 10:16] that is the only Church that contains the 'Fullness of the Christian Faith".
This needs to be answered.About those rosary beads,I am pretty sure that the prayers that Mary offers to Jesus on our behalf reach him with more effect than your own.
I pray FOR my friends, and my friends pray FOR me;Why ask Mary to pray for us? For the same reason you would ask the person that goes to your church to pray for you.
Praying FOR a person is very much different than praying TO a person.Why ask the person that goes to your church to pray for you. if praying directly to Jesus does it all. Why ask another to pray for you period.
If you came to that conclusion, then it is obvious that you rejected the one true message that salvation is by grace through faith and that not of yourself. That truly is sad. For both messages cannot be true. It is sad that you have chosen the way of error.And by the way, I am a Catholic revert and I have studied the Bible religiously as a Baptist fundamentalist, now as a Catholic I read it dailey as it was intended to be interpreted , just the very same way as did those Catholic Bishops that interpreted all those many different canonical and non- canonical books that they had to seperate. In order to know which were Canonical, those bishops had to have known the correct" One True " interpretation.
The apocrypha was not officially accepted until the Council of Trent.By saying that the Catholic Church has the wrong interpretation , how can you be sure that all the Books in your NT are the correct ones ?
The early church knew what books were inspired and which were not.And don't give me some malarky story. the Holy Bible never had a 'Table of Contents ' to list which Books belonged in the completed Bible. It was the bishops and the bishops alone through the guidence of the HS that gave us the correct List of Canon. Can you imagine if one of the many thousands of other churches ,if one of them attempted at selecting the correct Books with their Johnny-come-lately man-made interpretation, our Holy Bible would most definitely be classified as an unholy bible book.
And it isn't the RCC who has a history of killing the true saints of God, spilling their blood in various Crusades, Inquisitions, etc.There only was and still only "One True Interpretation' and it belongs to Christs' Apostolic Church, [ Luke 10:16] that is the only Church that contains the 'Fullness of the Christian Faith".
Philippians 2:10.Then why bow down?
Not sure what you are asking here. Do you mean, "How many people pray at a time when their bible is physically in front of them?" or do you mean, "How many people address their prayers to a bible?" My personal answer to the first would be, "Sometimes". If, whether in a church service, or privately at home, I pray having just read the bible, I don't stop, put my bible away out of sight, and then pray. In that sense, I do sometimes pray while my bible is infront of me, but that certainly doesn't mean I am making an idol out of it. I never address prayer to my bible. If I did, I would be guilty of what you suggest.Nice try
I would worried more about those that engage in bibleidolatry.
How many people pray before a Bible?
I have no idea how many people do that. Again, if you are suggesting that people hold their bibles up and address prayers to them, that would of course be wrong. But it is not wrong (in my opinion) to pray while you have a bible in your hand.How many hold the Bible up in their hands while they pray.
I have never deliberately turned to the direction of where my bible happens to be before praying, nor have I ever seen anyone else do so. That sounds remarkably like the Roman Catholic and Anglican practice of facing Jerusalem when saying the Apostles' Creed, and bowing the head at the mention of the name "Jesus".Some people will after reading the Bible, bow their heads in the direction of the Bible and began praying.
Sorry, but what is your basis for this idea? Both are important, and we are not told to time ourselves to work out how much time we are spending on each.Answer me this.
A. How many hours to do you spend praying to God?
B. How many hours do you spend reading the Bible?
If the answer to B is greater than the answer to A, then you're are guilty of BibleIdolatry.
Also these verses show that God does permit the use of religious statues and images , so long as we avoid idolatry. Ex 25;18-20
Ex. 26 v 1
Num. 21:8-9
1 Kings 7; 23- 29
1 kings 6: 23-28
Col. 1 v 15
Then why bow down?
I explained that in #83. They are not 'bowing TO' anything. They are bowing at the words 'We Adore You O Christ And We Praise You, For By Your Cross You have Redeemed The World'. I see nothing wrong with that.
When Catholics enter a Catholic Church they genuflect or bow before entering their pew. In this instance they would be 'bowing TO' something. They believe in the presence of Christ in the consecrated bread that is kept in the tabernacle and bow in reverence to that. Now, if they are wrong about the 'Real Presence' of Christ in the bread and wine, then I would say they are guilty of idolatry for the attention they give it. Make sense?
I have asked Catholics about this and they insist they are not worshipping statues or pictures. I trust they know who and what they are worshipping.
They will tell you that they don't worship the image itself, but what the image represents. For example if it is either an image of Jesus or Mary, then they will say they are praying to Jesus or Mary.I have asked Catholics about this and they insist they are not worshipping statues or pictures. I trust they know who and what they are worshipping.
They will tell you that they don't worship the image itself, but what the image represents. For example if it is either an image of Jesus or Mary, then they will say they are praying to Jesus or Mary.
However a Hindu will say the same thing. If asked about the idols of Ganesh (elephant god) or Ram, they will say they are not praying to the idol but the god behind the idol, what the image represents. So what is the difference? There is none. Both are idolatry, and are condemned in the Bible as such.
Ann I realize you're using a little mild sarcasm here to make a point, but the word you're looking for is veneration. Look it up. It's a good word. You can use it.They don't worship Mary, they revere her. At least that's what I think they say. No - wait - it's that they adore her. That's what Catholics have told me. It's not worship, it's adoration. :BangHead:
Ann I realize you're using a little mild sarcasm here to make a point, but the word you're looking for is veneration. Look it up. It's a good word. You can use it.
Ann I realize you're using a little mild sarcasm here to make a point, but the word you're looking for is veneration. Look it up. It's a good word. You can use it.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/venerationveneration [ˌvɛnəˈreɪʃən]n1. a feeling or expression of awe or reverence
2. the act of venerating or the state of being venerated