• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is Cal/Non-Cal important enough to divide?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The SBC is NOT Arminian. Primitive Baptists and Freewill Baptists are two baptists that I know of that are Arminian, but the SBC is certainly not.

Some are Cal but none are Arminian. At least none that Ihave ever heard of. They all, as far as I know believe in eternal security, which is not Arminian by any streatch.

John

Primitive Baptists are Arminians!?!? That's news to me. But I really know zilch about Southern Baptists...... must be a Southern thing cause there aint none here......maybe in Wisconsin! :smilewinkgrin:
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't inderstand your reasoning here.

Of course Grace through Faith is a gift from God.....but where does it say that the gift cannot be rejected?

Or that it is only given to the 'chosen"?

John

I never said it did..... I did say that it appears insane to think that God would stand there & offer a guy salvation only to be rejected & look ridiculous. Further I asked why would anyone given new life would ever reject it....I certainly did not....did you? Haven't had an answer to my satisfaction.
 

seekingthetruth

New Member
Primitive Baptists are Arminians!?!? That's news to me. But I really know zilch about Southern Baptists...... must be a Southern thing cause there aint none here......maybe in Wisconsin! :smilewinkgrin:

If you don't know zilch about Southern Baptists, then why would you incorrectly call them Arminian?

Every non-cal is not NOT Arminian.

Some, like me, are just regular Christians.:smilewinkgrin: Some of us believe in parts of the same points as Cals and Arminian, but not to every point.

For instance, the main point I do agree with Cals on is eternal security. And the main point i disagree on with Arminians is conditional salvation.

John
 

seekingthetruth

New Member
I never said it did..... I did say that it appears insane to think that God would stand there & offer a guy salvation only to be rejected & look ridiculous. Further I asked why would anyone given new life would ever reject it....I certainly did not....did you? Haven't had an answer to my satisfaction.

When a man rejects salvation, it is he that looks ridiculous, not God.

No, I don't understand why people reject the gospel. I know of people that say they believe in God but won't seek salvation because they love the things of the world more. Still, the Bible tells us over and over that we can choose God or we can choose the world, so obviously God does gives us the choice to reject Grace.

John
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Excuse me, I meant General Baptists.

John

Frankly dont know much about them either. I know Catholics....they are the predominant religion here....then we have some Reformed & Presbyterian Churches & a plethora of apostate UMC & PCUSA churches in my landscape....baptists of any kind, not so much.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
A denomination reflects differences of something of the same kind. If my understanding is dogmatically Calvinistic, then I would probably attend that type of church. If it is dogmatically Wesleyan, I’d probably find that type of church.

If, however, I do not believe that either system of understanding is infallible but instead I hold to an understanding that they present important aspects under debatable conclusions because each are based on human reasoning, then I may be content to attend a church that defines itself as neither.
 

Winman

Active Member
I never said it did..... I did say that it appears insane to think that God would stand there & offer a guy salvation only to be rejected & look ridiculous. Further I asked why would anyone given new life would ever reject it....I certainly did not....did you? Haven't had an answer to my satisfaction.

Luk 18:22 Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me.
23 And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich.
24 And when Jesus saw that he was very sorrowful, he said, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!
25 For it is easier for a camel to go through a needle's eye, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.

Well, here you go, Jesus certainly offered the young rich ruler salvation, but the young man rejected it. Did it make Jesus look ridiculous?

A yes or no answer will suffice.
 

mandym

New Member
Frankly dont know much about them either. I know Catholics....they are the predominant religion here....then we have some Reformed & Presbyterian Churches & a plethora of apostate UMC & PCUSA churches in my landscape....baptists of any kind, not so much.

At the founding of the convention there were General Baptists (non cal) and Particular Baptists (cal).
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
If you don't know zilch about Southern Baptists, then why would you incorrectly call them Arminian?

Every non-cal is not NOT Arminian.

Some, like me, are just regular Christians.:smilewinkgrin: Some of us believe in parts of the same points as Cals and Arminian, but not to every point.

For instance, the main point I do agree with Cals on is eternal security. And the main point i disagree on with Arminians is conditional salvation.

John

Pure ignorance. So your saying all arminians believe this doctrine?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top