Please prove this. I've never heard of it before (which of course doesn't make it wrong.)The first and the last has a special significance with those first-century Jews.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Please prove this. I've never heard of it before (which of course doesn't make it wrong.)The first and the last has a special significance with those first-century Jews.
Once again you have the pre-opinion, unproven, that "reward" in the Bible can mean eternal life. You simply cannot prove this Biblically. Again, nowhere in the Bible does "reward" mean "everlasting life." It is nothing more than your spiritualization. And you should realize that even when you spiritualize the Bible you can't change the meaning of a word. Every first grader knows that you have to do something to receive a reward. But you do nothing to receive salvation. It is a gift of God.
I'm sorry, I don't understand where you are going with this. What does it have to do with the OP?
The Greek word here is misthapodotes, "a giver of rewards," occurring only here in the NT. Interestingly enough, it is a compound consisting of the two most common words in the NT for "reward"--misthos (wages or reward) and apodidomi, a verb for "to give a reward."John, I have a question for you, what does "rewarder" in Heb 11:6 refer to?
Heb 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
This word has caused me some confusion in the past, because it seems to imply that eternal life is earned. I am not saying that, I believe we are saved without works through faith. Still, this word has confused me somewhat.
I'm not completely opposed to viewing the crowns as metaphorical, but given the meaning of the word the crowns (as Martin Marprelate pointed out) they must be some kind of reward. So I fail to see how they can mean eternal life. Simply because a word is a metaphor in the NT, you can't change the core meaning. "Crowns" in the NT are a reward. Eternal life is not.I think the crowns as well as the house in 2C5 are all metaphor's of eternal life as well as some others that are used. That eternal life will come from having been given the Holy Spirit. By the Holy Spirit we will at the resurrection be springing up into everlasting life.
I agree wholeheartedly with this. :thumbs:I also think along with being given the Holy Spirit which will being us eternal life comes responsibility to use those gifts which came along with that Spirit to work for God. As in Luke 19:11-26 those who worked for God with the gifts from him and increased, at the appearing of Jesus, receive greater rewards ie responsibility in the coming kingdom of God.
Those who though the faith have come to God and diligently seek him by their working for him will be given the greater reward.
Let's take a look at some actual "crown" verses.
1. Crown of rejoicing (1st Thess. 2:19)
2. Crown of righteousness (2nd Tim. 4:8)
3. Crown of life (James 1:12)
4. Crown of glory (1st Peter 5:4)
Many of the passages and themes of the Bible are more familiar than understood. A case in point is the issue of the crowns we are said to receive based on the outcome of various levels of obedience. Who has not heard a sermon - probably more than once - of how we, though we receive these crowns, will throw them back at the Savior's feet?
What is wrong with this picture? Several things. For one, it ignores Biblical usage of terms. Let's take a look at some actual "crown" verses.
1. Crown of rejoicing (1st Thess. 2:19)
2. Crown of righteousness (2nd Tim. 4:8)
3. Crown of life (James 1:12)
4. Crown of glory (1st Peter 5:4)
These are actually different names for the same reward - etrnal life - just described different ways.
Or are we to assume that there will be some gloomy, inglorious Christians who have crowns 2 and 3, but lack 1 and 4?
To speak of a Crown of [fill in the blank] is just a way for the bible to describe our reward under different aspects. This is a common mode of expression in the Bible.
Consider "spirit". How many Spirits of God does the Christian have helping him? By this same thinking we would have to have several:
Spirit of truth
spirit of holiness
Spirit of life in Christ Jesus
Spirit of adoption
Spirit of the living God
spirit of faith
Spirit of promise
Spirit of grace
etc.....
But there really is only one Holy Spirit.
So the crowns are the very same thing.
Here are the crown verses.
1Th 2:19 For what is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing? Are not
even ye in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ at his coming?
2Ti 4:8 Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness,
which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and
not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing.
Jas 1:12 Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is
tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath
promised to them that love him.
1Pe 5:4 And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a
crown of glory that fadeth not away.
The Greek word here is misthapodotes, "a giver of rewards," occurring only here in the NT. Interestingly enough, it is a compound consisting of the two most common words in the NT for "reward"--misthos (wages or reward) and apodidomi, a verb for "to give a reward."
I don't think this verse is about etenal life at all. The context both before and after is about OT believers who proved their faith by their works, such as Enoch in v. 5 who had a "testimony that he pleased God" (not a statement of salvation).
Um, Enoch went to Heaven because he was already saved. This is not referring to his salvation. The death he did not see was physical death, which happens to all. His faith as a believer is what got him "translated," taken to Heaven alive, something that has happened to no one else but Elijah. Unless you think you have the faith to have the same thing happen....:smilewinkgrin:By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.
Salvation, eternal life, that he should not see death!
Well, maybe you are right?
Um, Enoch went to Heaven because he was already saved. This is not referring to his salvation. The death he did not see was physical death, which happens to all. His faith as a believer is what got him "translated," taken to Heaven alive, something that has happened to no one else but Elijah. Unless you think you have the faith to have the same thing happen....:smilewinkgrin:
I've not made any detailed studies of Enoch, but I think your interpretion is a valid possibility. The word for "translated" in Heb. 11:5 is only used 3 times in the NT, all in Hebrews. In 12:2 it just means "removed" but in 7:12 it indicates a change which might include a new body in 11:5.Brother John, I have always viewed Enoch translation as him being given his new body as he was called out to be with the Lord. No flesh will glory in His presence.
Do you know anyone else who holds this view?
Um, Enoch went to Heaven because he was already saved. This is not referring to his salvation. The death he did not see was physical death, which happens to all. His faith as a believer is what got him "translated," taken to Heaven alive, something that has happened to no one else but Elijah. Unless you think you have the faith to have the same thing happen....:smilewinkgrin:
I've not made any detailed studies of Enoch, but I think your interpretion is a valid possibility. The word for "translated" in Heb. 11:5 is only used 3 times in the NT, all in Hebrews. In 12:2 it just means "removed" but in 7:12 it indicates a change which might include a new body in 11:5.
Brother John, I have always viewed Enoch translation as him being given his new body as he was called out to be with the Lord. No flesh will glory in His presence.
Do you know anyone else who holds this view?
Could this mean he tasted physical death when he was translated? I think the death that Enoch did not taste was eternal death, but when he got his new body, his flesh man did die in the translation(changed from physical to spiritual). Understand what I am trying to convey?
I would say impossible and here is why.
John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, the Son of man which is in heaven.
The only explanation I have ever heard concerning that verse relative to Enoch and Elijah is that they did not bodily ascend. Now you are giving Enoch a body to ascent with.
However now you have to reconcile that thought with, "Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep,(die) but we shall all be changed'.
Um, Enoch went to Heaven because he was already saved. This is not referring to his salvation. The death he did not see was physical death, which happens to all. His faith as a believer is what got him "translated," taken to Heaven alive, something that has happened to no one else but Elijah. Unless you think you have the faith to have the same thing happen....:smilewinkgrin: