What in that context would lead you to believe that the perfect being the closing of the canon? That seems like a stretch.
Tad,
1 Cor 13:9-10
For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when the perfect [teleios] comes, the partial will pass away.
the KJV translators used a phrase "that which is perfect" to best translate the single Greek word "teleios"
teleios: having reached its end, i.e. complete, by ext. perfect
Original Word: τέλειος, α, ον
Part of Speech: Adjective
Transliteration: teleios
Phonetic Spelling: (tel'-i-os)
Short Definition: perfect, full-grown
Definition: perfect, (a) complete in all its parts, (b) full grown, of full age, (c) specially of the completeness of Christian character.
the word "teleios" is a gender neutral word and, when compared to the definitions posted above, it ought to be clear that "teleios" is not referring to Jesus Christ.
1 Cor 13:8-10
Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away
those are gifts of the Spirit that were in operation when the Church still did nto have what we call the New Testament and so, the New Testament was brought to the churches via the apostles, their letters (epistles), prophets and teachers.
For we know in part, and we prophesy in part [meros]
This could mean no one church had all of the prophesies (New Testament teachings) yet. The word in the Greek that was translated "part" is "meros" and it means "a division or share".
But when that which is perfect [teleios] is come, then that which is in part [meros] shall be done away
The only thing I can think of that was in part but is now whole, complete (contains all the shares, all the divisions) is the closed Canon we call the holy bible. Since it was completed (closed) no one has added anything to it's pages. The apocrypha was added to the KJV but llater removed.
regarding the Apocrypha:
A point of interest is that Josephus, a Jew who lived about the time of Jesus and apostles stated that the Apocrypha were not accepted by the Jews.
"From Artexerxes to our own time the complete history has been written but has not been deemed worthy of equal credit with the earlier records because of the failure of the exact succession of the prophets. ... We have not an innumerable multitude of books among us, disagreeing from and contradicting one another, but only twenty-two books, which contain the records of all the past times; which are justly believed to be divine ..." [Flavius Josephus, Against Apion, I.8]. The Manual of Discipline in the Dead Sea Scrolls, dating two hundred years before Christ, also rejected the apocrypha as inspired
Pentecostals, Charismatics, etc have been teaching that "when that which is perfect is come" is referring to the second coming of Jesus Christ (because they think it makes them correct to believe the gifts have been given back to the Church of our day) but teaching such a thing is what is considered to be serious error since it is not difficult to do the study of the word "teleios". To reject the truth once it is know (in this case, that "teleios" is not referring to Jesus Christ) and then to keep teaching the error (teaching others that "when that which is perfect is come" is referring to the second coming of Jesus Christ) is what is called heresy. Dangerous stuff, for Jesus said just a pinch of yeast (leaven) will spread throughout the whole lump of dough.
Speaking of Matthew 16:11, did you ever stop to realize Jesus calls us Dough Brains :laugh: